• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

fuel pumpe....155 or 190?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MossDaHaus
  • Start date Start date Oct 22, 2005
M

MossDaHaus

New Member
Sep 16, 2005
11
0
0
Brighton, MI
Oct 22, 2005
#1
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #1
I am in desperate need of buying a new fuel pump and need to know what size is stock. I am also asking if i should go with the 190 due to the planning of new heads, cobra intake, TB, and full exhaust. Thanks!
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Oct 22, 2005
#2
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #2
i would go with 190 or 255
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 22, 2005
#3
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #3
Everyone here only likes excessive excess (sic) - 255.
 

loudpedal99

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
160
0
0
ND
Oct 22, 2005
#4
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #4
Go with the 255; you won't have to upgrade later. I just got one from ebay brand new $94 shipped. I think his ID was 'mr.fuelpump'
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Oct 22, 2005
#5
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #5
Go with the 255. The worst thing that happens is the extra fuel gets returned to the tank. The stock pump is 88 LPH I believe.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 22, 2005
#6
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #6
190lph is fine.

I run a 255 high pressure pump in my street car but I used to spray a dry hit No issues what so ever.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 22, 2005
#7
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #7
I think SN's stock pump is 95 LPH (early aero foxes have 88 LPH pumps).
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 22, 2005
#8
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #8
Like some of the other guys, I think a 190 would be fine for a pretty serious na combo.

The nice thing about having the larger 255 is if you ever decide to go forced induction its already there and its only a few bux more.

Grady
 

mricci

Member
Aug 17, 2003
301
0
17
Massachusetts
Oct 22, 2005
#9
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #9
I would just go 255 incase you ever want the extra kick of a blower or nitrous.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
244
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
659
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
877
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
331
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?