• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Fuel system cleaning

  • Thread starter Thread starter JERRYS04GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 11, 2010

JERRYS04GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2010
10
0
0
St.Petersburg FL.
Sep 11, 2010
#1
  • Sep 11, 2010
  • #1
I decided to do some preventive maintenance on my car and I want to run some Sea Foam through it. I'm not sure witch vacuum line feed all the cylinders, on my other cars I would use the brake booster line but I don't see one on this car. Would the PCV line work?
 

Bornstanger

Uncle 'Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me''Kiss Me'er
Founding Member
Oct 20, 2001
476
0
26
Strongsville, OH
Sep 14, 2010
#2
  • Sep 14, 2010
  • #2
here's a video showing you how to seafoam your stang. figure it's better than trying to explain it all with words and what not. the end of the video is just the guy driving his stang around so you really don't need to watch the entire thing. hope this helps.

YouTube - How to seafoam a 96-04 mustang GT
 

JERRYS04GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2010
10
0
0
St.Petersburg FL.
Sep 14, 2010
#3
  • Sep 14, 2010
  • #3
Thanks for the video
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 15, 2010
#4
  • Sep 15, 2010
  • #4
Modern cars run so cleanly that I just don't understand the "sea foam" movement. Combustion chambers always stay clean. Even intake ports are cleaned by the port-injector. And the manifold runners only move air so they stay clean too. Pull a plug out and you'll see it's near white or tan -- perfect, as it should be. This is a reflection of how clean the whole chamber is.

In the old days when crude and unreliable choke mechanisms provided carbs with a cold-start enrichment it wasn't unusual to see soot coming out the tailpipe and black spark plugs. Things are so different in these days of acutely accurate fuel delivery control and mixture feedback.

As well, I guarantee that a lot of that fluid simply puddles at the bottom of the intake manifold deep in the plenum. The Seafoam MSDS data sheet says:

"...Flammable liquid and vapor. Will ignite when exposed to heat, flame and other sources of ignition. ..."

There's a risk the stuff could ignite in the event of a backfire and pop the plastic intake manifold. As well, there are expensive catalytic converters that have to deal with the "...Sulphur oxides; Phosphorus compounds; other unidentified organic compounds..." combusting the stuff produces.

So what's the point?
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Sep 15, 2010
#5
  • Sep 15, 2010
  • #5
trinity_gt said:
Modern cars run so cleanly that I just don't understand the "sea foam" movement. Combustion chambers always stay clean. Even intake ports are cleaned by the port-injector. And the manifold runners only move air so they stay clean too. Pull a plug out and you'll see it's near white or tan -- perfect, as it should be. This is a reflection of how clean the whole chamber is.

In the old days when crude and unreliable choke mechanisms provided carbs with a cold-start enrichment it wasn't unusual to see soot coming out the tailpipe and black spark plugs. Things are so different in these days of acutely accurate fuel delivery control and mixture feedback.

As well, I guarantee that a lot of that fluid simply puddles at the bottom of the intake manifold deep in the plenum. The Seafoam MSDS data sheet says:

"...Flammable liquid and vapor. Will ignite when exposed to heat, flame and other sources of ignition. ..."

There's a risk the stuff could ignite in the event of a backfire and pop the plastic intake manifold. As well, there are expensive catalytic converters that have to deal with the "...Sulphur oxides; Phosphorus compounds; other unidentified organic compounds..." combusting the stuff produces.

So what's the point?
Click to expand...

Any gas that burns leaves some kind of residue, right?! SeaFoam might not be worth doing for cars that are semi-driven and have lived a so-so life. But, for a car who has been driven hard and burned off a lot of blowby, the stuff is worth doing. Blowby is nasty, nasty, stuff. And will ruin an engine. The detergents in gasoline only do but so much, and will continue until the gasoline creators find a way to make a more volitile formula to burn quicker w/less substance and ash residue.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 15, 2010
#6
  • Sep 15, 2010
  • #6
trombonedemon said:
Any gas that burns leaves some kind of residue, right?! SeaFoam might not be worth doing for cars that are semi-driven and have lived a so-so life. But, for a car who has been driven hard and burned off a lot of blowby, the stuff is worth doing. Blowby is nasty, nasty, stuff. And will ruin an engine. The detergents in gasoline only do but so much, and will continue until the gasoline creators find a way to make a more volitile formula to burn quicker w/less substance and ash residue.
Click to expand...

Blowby is combustion gases getting past the piston rings and into the crankcase. Every engine "suffers" this to some degree which is why draft tube and later closed positive crankcase ventilation was developed.

Frequent oil changes and PCV maintenance are the proper way to fix this, not pouring some extra-low viscosity naptha into the sump. And if the engine has so much blowby that the PCV system is being overwhelmed, Seafoam is the last of the concerns.

As I said, pull the plug on any modern fuel injected engine and you'll see it basically white. Engines burn so cleanly now that even the old-school "tan" colour is rarely seen. Combustion chambers don't get carbon-fouled any more. And if the valves are getting fouled, one should be looking at valve stem seals, not pouring liquid solvent into the plenum.

Just seems like a gimmick to me.
 

trombonedemon

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2009
1,962
39
59
U.S.A, U.S.A., U.S.A.!
Sep 16, 2010
#7
  • Sep 16, 2010
  • #7
trinity_gt said:
Blowby is combustion gases getting past the piston rings and into the crankcase. Every engine "suffers" this to some degree which is why draft tube and later closed positive crankcase ventilation was developed.

Frequent oil changes and PCV maintenance are the proper way to fix this, not pouring some extra-low viscosity naptha into the sump. And if the engine has so much blowby that the PCV system is being overwhelmed, Seafoam is the last of the concerns.

As I said, pull the plug on any modern fuel injected engine and you'll see it basically white. Engines burn so cleanly now that even the old-school "tan" colour is rarely seen. Combustion chambers don't get carbon-fouled any more. And if the valves are getting fouled, one should be looking at valve stem seals, not pouring liquid solvent into the plenum.

Just seems like a gimmick to me.
Click to expand...
Gimmick, yes. Whether this stuff works is up to the owner. From my experiences w/this stuff, before and after, the car seemed to have smoother revs. After the smoke screen show. I did the same a 6 months later, no smoke screen show, but the car retained the same performance. Snake oil, maybe. I agree w/you on the cleaning burning cars though. I won't put the stuff my intake again though. Seems like it would foul up my plugs that way, I'd rather mix the stuff w/fuel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Fuel Capable fuel system for +600hp
  • Avia.tuned
  • Feb 24, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
115
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2026
squeak93
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
530
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
875
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Vortech V3 Si - Bypass Valve to BOV swap issues
  • seanmahoney
  • Jun 26, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
656
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 26, 2025
seanmahoney
D
After Market fuel rails with Stock fuel lines
  • dropteeth
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
206
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?