• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

FYI Steeda has Idoit reps

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yobi1Kanobi
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 18, 2006
#41
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #41
i would just like to offer up my .02 on strage struts. i set up some mm cc plates on a buddies car that had strange struts on it--fox body struts which is par for a lowered SN. i noted that they required much more top side adjustment to achieve proper bump travel.

i am no drag racer and don't even pretend like i know how to setup a drag car. all i am trying to say is that is pretty excessive adjustment to make a car handle.

fwiw my mm coilovers/cc plates make absolutely no noise---none.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 18, 2006
#42
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #42
Using fox struts on a 94-95 isnt ideal, our struts work fine on loweredcars...using the right parts make a diff

Top side adj? I dont understand?
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 18, 2006
#43
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #43
eades5.0 said:
Using fox struts on a 94-95 isnt ideal, our struts work fine on loweredcars...using the right parts make a diff

Top side adj? I dont understand?
Click to expand...


if you use fox struts you gain approx 1" of bump travel and is a very common upgrade for us. most of the struts sold for lowered 94-04 are really fox struts.

as for the top side, i am reffering to the amount of spacers that are required to position the strut properly for bump travel reasons. like i said, that was the only dealing i had with that particular brand and they may be that way for a reason. al i know is the koni's and tockico's(all fox body struts) i have had on my car did not require such drastic spacer arrangements.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 18, 2006
#44
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #44
Much comes into play here..you can also flip the CC plates for more strut travel. If fig'ing spacers is what your ref'ing to the easiest way is to basically you just want to make sure you don't bottom the struts out. Compress the strut to see how far it will go down then look at the control arm travel and see when the bump stop hits the frame and make sure you don't exceed the available strut travel.

That easy..no matter if you run the correct strut or not I suppose. Thats why they give you multiple spacers and some even have to make their own spacers.

Hope I understand what your saying.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 18, 2006
#45
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #45
eades5.0 said:
Much comes into play here..you can also flip the CC plates for more strut travel. If fig'ing spacers is what your ref'ing to the easiest way is to basically you just want to make sure you don't bottom the struts out. Compress the strut to see how far it will go down then look at the control arm travel and see when the bump stop hits the frame and make sure you don't exceed the available strut travel.

That easy..no matter if you run the correct strut or not I suppose. Thats why they give you multiple spacers and some even have to make their own spacers.

Hope I understand what your saying.
Click to expand...


i didn't have a hard time config the spacers. i'm just saying that the arrangement differed very differently from any other strut i had done. so much so that i was worried about hood clearance.

i know jack about stranges valving arrangement--these were the 10 ways--so he may very well have had it setup weird, but that strut had absolutely NO rebound. just another thing i thought was unusual---i would like it if you could expand on why that was.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 18, 2006
#46
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #46
Rebound as in extend when outta the car..if so I can answer very easily
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Dec 18, 2006
#47
  • Dec 18, 2006
  • #47
eades5.0 said:
Rebound as in extend when outta the car..if so I can answer very easily
Click to expand...

 

SVT3183

Member
Mar 30, 2005
180
0
16
S Jersey
Dec 19, 2006
#48
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #48
gmkillr said:
Good quality parts arent suppose to be cheap! Im not saying that Steeda makes the best parts or anything like that, but hey if you wanna play you gotta pay!
Click to expand...

you see any cheap parts in my sig? i'll pay the money but problems + expensive = = steeda
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Dec 19, 2006
#49
  • Dec 19, 2006
  • #49
bimmertech said:
Click to expand...


Strange struts are 100% oil filled thus why they dont "shoot-out" when compressed like struts that are filled with nitrogen do.
This is Stranges "edge" on the industry and gives them better valving control.

the strange struts you can push in and they will barely rebound by themselves, if any at all.
That is 100% normal for them.
 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Dec 20, 2006
#50
  • Dec 20, 2006
  • #50
I was wondering I have the 3 bolt CC plates. Why would I need 4 bolt ones...
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Dec 21, 2006
#51
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #51
extra strength for the most part, but even 3 bolt pieces are better than the factory stamped crap.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
758
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
F
Maximum Motorsports Customer Service - Did I Call On An Off Day?/please Help.
  • Firehawk335
  • Jul 3, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 3, 2017
Firehawk335
F
Progress Thread The Grey Car
  • Kornnut
  • Aug 17, 2015
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
6K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 12, 2020
Kornnut
S
  • Locked
Expired Wingless Kona Blue '96 Cobra
  • streetpilot
  • Apr 10, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
27K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) May 23, 2013
Ry6uy
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?