• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum

Going to Re-DDyno my Kenne Bell 01 Cobra tomorrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter DoubleONegative
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2004

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 17, 2004
#1
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #1
Ok guys here is the deal.

After my first Dyno i only put down 405RWHP and 386RWTQ running really rich on 8psi the dyno a land and sea AWD dyno. Tomorrow i am going to a Dyno Jet the same dyno that my car has about 12 pulls on. The original dyno was done 4 days after the install.

This time we are going to do a complete data log using Raptor and SCT software. So hopefully we will get the bottom of it

My stock and modded numbers are in my sig

wish me luck

Mike
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Nov 17, 2004
#2
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #2
good luck dude.
 

FEARNO1

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
1,241
1
39
Maine
Nov 17, 2004
#3
  • Nov 17, 2004
  • #3
Which dyno place is that?
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 18, 2004
#4
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #4
Fred,

Performance Dyno
 

FEARNO1

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
1,241
1
39
Maine
Nov 18, 2004
#5
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #5
Thats where I thought you were going? So what was the outcome?
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 18, 2004
#6
  • Nov 18, 2004
  • #6
The results are

405RWHP/366RWTQ

The A/f was perfect believe it or not but it is pulling timing up top 3-4 degrees

With a little timing added it should make 420-430ish still off the advertised HP rating. Amazingly though if you do the math it comes within 2hp of the rating 462 but thats at the flywheel. KB claims that same number at the rear-wheel....interesting huh? 405x .15 = 60.75 or 461BHP
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 19, 2004
#7
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #7
My Dyno Sheet

 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 19, 2004
#8
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #8
Nice numbers bro! You must be proud
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 19, 2004
#9
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #9
Darkhorse845 said:
Nice numbers bro! You must be proud
Click to expand...

No not really Kenne Bell was claiming 462RWHP with this kit

I think with some more tuning i'll get her to 425-430RWHP
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Nov 19, 2004
#10
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #10
DoubleONegative said:
No not really Kenne Bell was claiming 462RWHP with this kit

I think with some more tuning i'll get her to 425-430RWHP
Click to expand...
Yes I'm sure a little tuning will get you to 420-430! I still think your dyno
sheet is impressive! Nice number's
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
Houston
Nov 19, 2004
#11
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #11
Wow, that torque curve is about as flat as it gets
-U should call Kenne Bell and demand 35rwhp from them...theyll tell you to opt for their intake kit i bet.
 

FEARNO1

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
1,241
1
39
Maine
Nov 19, 2004
#12
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #12
HoustonGT said:
-U should call Kenne Bell and demand 35rwhp from them...theyll tell you to opt for their intake kit i bet.
Click to expand...

he did get the cold air kit...

Mike At least you A/F looks better...I wonder what that says about the other dyno's a/f reading???
 
P

Pitch Black

New Member
Jul 17, 2004
369
0
0
TX
Nov 19, 2004
#13
  • Nov 19, 2004
  • #13
Ouch, 2V's usually pull more with the 9# KB kit
 

Craig Mack

Busted Buffing the Bishop
Founding Member
Mar 9, 2002
801
0
0
Lake Mary, FL
Nov 20, 2004
#14
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #14
Those #'s seem really low man...I'm kinda p!ssed for ya....you'd be making around 460rwhp if that was a vortech kit.
 
R

Ray@VSK

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
355
0
0
Nov 20, 2004
#15
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #15
Ya there's definately something wrong there bro, you should be seeing alot more torque than horsepower, I am also running 8lbs boost (see sig) & I am pulling 400 hp & over 500 torque rear wheel, I was running allitle lean prior & at only 6 degrees timing prior & was still pulling 355 hp & 444 torque @ the rear wheels.
 

HPLouis

Founding Member
Jun 18, 2001
65
0
6
DC Metro Area
Nov 20, 2004
#16
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #16
Ray@VSK said:
Ya there's definately something wrong there bro, you should be seeing alot more torque than horsepower, I am also running 8lbs boost (see sig) & I am pulling 400 hp & over 500 torque rear wheel, I was running allitle lean prior & at only 6 degrees timing prior & was still pulling 355 hp & 444 torque @ the rear wheels.
Click to expand...

He might not see more torque than horsepower. He's got a mod motor and it's only 281 ci versus your car which is 302. I had a Paxton blown 99 Cobra and I saw 455.5 rwhp and 381.1 rwtq. On my 95 Cobra, I made 395 rwhp and 415 rwtq.

Now the KB should give him more torque than the Paxton though.
 

one2gamble

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
902
1
0
Monterey
Nov 20, 2004
#17
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #17
I keep reading this over and over again with the KB kit, I have yet to see a dyno number higher than 410. In my opinion I wouldnt touch the KB until they figure out whats up.
 
R

Railroad

New Member
Jul 10, 1999
37
0
0
Warrior,Alabama,USA
Nov 20, 2004
#18
  • Nov 20, 2004
  • #18
I got close. Made 406 rwhp with a 462 rwhp KB kit. I think they have one tech. He is developing all the 04 and 05 KB kits for all makes of vehicles.
So far he is the only one responding to our problem. It is not too hard to figure out where we stand on the priority list.
With a limited number of 99 and 01s, most of them already modded,
the maket has its limits.
Most of the 9 lb kits seem to be just low on power.
The lower boost kits are low on hp and seem to have tuning problems also.




one2gamble said:
I keep reading this over and over again with the KB kit, I have yet to see a dyno number higher than 410. In my opinion I wouldnt touch the KB until they figure out whats up.
Click to expand...
 
P

Pitch Black

New Member
Jul 17, 2004
369
0
0
TX
Nov 21, 2004
#19
  • Nov 21, 2004
  • #19
HPLouis said:
He might not see more torque than horsepower. He's got a mod motor and it's only 281 ci versus your car which is 302. I had a Paxton blown 99 Cobra and I saw 455.5 rwhp and 381.1 rwtq. On my 95 Cobra, I made 395 rwhp and 415 rwtq.

Now the KB should give him more torque than the Paxton though.
Click to expand...

KB bloweres and other roots/screw type blowers generally produce some heavy amounts of TQ in the mod motors, moreso than HP.
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
Nov 22, 2004
#20
  • Nov 22, 2004
  • #20
The the 4Vs are seeing more HP than TQ with these kits. KB advertised 462RWHP and 405RWTQ

Either way i am pissed that i am no where near where it should be
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
Expired 00/03 Cobra Clone Fully Built Street/track Monster Kenne Bell
  • BOSS GT
  • Aug 20, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
4
Views
12K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Oct 29, 2013
BOSS GT
B
Tuning Software / Hand helds / etc...
  • usaf_branham
  • Oct 29, 2010
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 8, 2010
trinity_gt
C
My new cobra has some issues HELP!
  • Charged01cobra
  • Sep 9, 2009
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
2
Views
905
SVT Tech Forum Sep 17, 2009
Charged01cobra
C
S
Tech Help: Valve float, not fully closing? (Long)
  • Seraphim38
  • Oct 25, 2009
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
4K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2009
Seraphim38
S
C
  • Locked
The Teal Terminator!!!...LOTS of details
  • CarCrazyRDM
  • Jun 4, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
19K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Dec 22, 2010
CarCrazyRDM
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SVT Tech Forum
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?