• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Got killed again tonight :(

  • Thread starter Thread starter ³à³
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 3, 2004
#41
  • May 3, 2004
  • #41
Stinger said:
Hmm...add 150 pounds to the nose and add 30hp...let me guess the outcome.
Click to expand...
LOL
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
May 3, 2004
#42
  • May 3, 2004
  • #42
It wont just be 30 hp
It will be more than your turbo I bet
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
May 3, 2004
#43
  • May 3, 2004
  • #43
And btw the 4.2 weighs just 35lbs more than your 2.3T
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 3, 2004
#44
  • May 3, 2004
  • #44
³à³ said:
It wont just be 30 hp
It will be more than your turbo I bet
Click to expand...
LOL I would drive to see that race...you would get sp bad
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 3, 2004
#45
  • May 3, 2004
  • #45
³à³ said:
It wont just be 30 hp
It will be more than your turbo I bet
Click to expand...
LOL I would drive to see that race...you would get so bad
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 3, 2004
#46
  • May 3, 2004
  • #46
³à³ said:
And btw the 4.2 weighs just 35lbs more than your 2.3T
Click to expand...
Yeah that's how much the motor weighs...what about everything else..shocks, sway bar, springs, and everything else
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 3, 2004
#47
  • May 3, 2004
  • #47
Well, you did what you thought was best...I'm just saying there is a reason nobody talks about the 4.2.

A n/a 2.3 (what you had and I has comparing to the 4.2) is alot lighter than a 2.3T as well.

Stinger
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
May 3, 2004
#48
  • May 3, 2004
  • #48
Why do people have to be so difficult? If you want a little tech help answer the questions because they are being asked for a reason to help you and for them to understand you clearly. There is no need to hassle people are here to help out man.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 5, 2004
#49
  • May 5, 2004
  • #49
I doubt he's getting anything done. $50 says his dad comes across some problem and they call the swap off. Then he'll be wanting to know why he didn't beat that '76 bug with his cold air intake and premium gas going in reverse.
 
B

blastit116

New Member
Oct 3, 2003
174
0
0
jupiter,florida
May 5, 2004
#50
  • May 5, 2004
  • #50
i got bat by a 92civic two door this weekend but about a half a car but i beat a 98 exploer also this weekend
 

HOWNDOG

Member
Aug 24, 2003
186
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 6, 2004
#51
  • May 6, 2004
  • #51
...strip the car down to about 1500lbs (keep the gas peddle). Cheap and fun at the same time and little techy knowledge required.

HD
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 6, 2004
#52
  • May 6, 2004
  • #52
That will only cut 1.5 seconds off his 1/4 mile time...he'll still be in the 17's or 18's...
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
May 6, 2004
#53
  • May 6, 2004
  • #53
³à³ said:
Anyone ever hear of the 4.2L V8 from 81 Stang? Thats what Im getting for like $500 running.
Click to expand...

Not trying to be rude!! but, asking this question on a forum for hmmmm cars is kind of Toolish don't you think?



³à³ said:
Whats wrong with the 81 Mustang V8? I just found out its 255cubes but about same power as the 5.0 from that year with more MPGs
Click to expand...

Cubes???? Pubes???? Tubes??? Newbs???? Please use the correct terms and when someone corrects you and politely explains the correct terms. Go with that and use them. Please.
 

HOWNDOG

Member
Aug 24, 2003
186
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 6, 2004
#54
  • May 6, 2004
  • #54
³à³ said:
And btw the 4.2 weighs just 35lbs more than your 2.3T
Click to expand...

You might want to compare the 255 weight to the 302 while you're going there. I'm guessing the 302 could be lighter.......

BTW, even Ford stopped talking about the 255 real quick. From the ones I've seen, the milage was as bad (and worse) than the 302 and was gutless to boot but most guys fix that problem by putting in a 302!

If economy and speed are what you're after a turbo 4 is a better choice over either V8. Do your homework, I'm sure you can locate a donar car in your area (where-ever that is). If a SB V8 is what you want, stick to the proven engines 289, 302, 351. Other than that, if the rest of the car is worth $500, fill your boots.


.....don't know why that kid used that goofy playstation car and not the parts truck to race Vin in FF.


HD

 

HOWNDOG

Member
Aug 24, 2003
186
0
16
Vancouver Island
May 6, 2004
#55
  • May 6, 2004
  • #55
3a3

........you might wanna check if your PC is set up for N.American charactors. Seems your name is coming out garbled.


HD
 
³

³à³

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
88
0
0
nowhere
May 8, 2004
#56
  • May 8, 2004
  • #56
Well you fools are all wrong. The car is up and running and sounding good. Unlike the pos 2.3 that got replaced that sounded like a fart in a can.
We have gone for a road test and though it isnt a race car it does pull evenly and will bark 2nd pretty easily. Id bet my left ball it will run in the 15s now. So for less than $800 total invested (without exhaust) I will have shaved over 7secs off the car.
The V8 sound alone was worth all the busted knuckles.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 8, 2004
#57
  • May 8, 2004
  • #57
No proof?
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 8, 2004
#58
  • May 8, 2004
  • #58
Crovax said:
No proof?
Click to expand...

Poof is in the pudding and we don't have any freaking pudding
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 8, 2004
#59
  • May 8, 2004
  • #59
I don't think he can make pudding though.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 8, 2004
#60
  • May 8, 2004
  • #60
I on the other hand am Bill Cosby with the jello pudding pops. Now!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
93 5.0 Microsquirt with Stage 3 trickflow tuning issues
  • marxpreston11
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3 4
Replies
67
Views
774
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 25, 2026
Mustang5L5
Radio, Speaker Upgrades
  • TripleYellow
  • Apr 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
113
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 24, 2026
TripleYellow
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
69
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Monday at 10:58 AM
ejscarfo
E
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
204
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
751
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?