• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

granatelli for blowthrough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dbiser
  • Start date Start date Jan 15, 2008

dbiser

New Member
Nov 4, 2007
24
0
2
wv
Jan 15, 2008
#1
  • Jan 15, 2008
  • #1
hello im working on a turbo install and i was wondering if a 90mm granatelli will work as a blow through if not is there any things i should do to use it as drawthrough
 

ken964698

New Member
Sep 2, 2007
7
0
0
Jan 15, 2008
#2
  • Jan 15, 2008
  • #2
maf

I am using a lightning meter and works great..it is also 90mm
 

diablostang

New Member
Sep 21, 2004
425
0
0
Raleigh, NC
Jan 17, 2008
#3
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #3
That's a pretty big MAFS for blowthrough.. I had a 90MM SCT MAFS for my drawthrough setup, but changed to a 3" Pro-Tube setup for my blow through. I've heard great things about the Professional Mass Air Systems meters, but I haven't started my car with my new meter yet.
 
9

94v6GT

New Member
May 13, 2006
141
0
0
Jan 17, 2008
#4
  • Jan 17, 2008
  • #4
I think his question may be:Can a MAF cal'd for draw-thru be used for blow-thru without issue? thats something I'd like to know too.
 
9

94v6GT

New Member
May 13, 2006
141
0
0
Jan 18, 2008
#5
  • Jan 18, 2008
  • #5
anyone know? im sure it would still meter but i'm wondering if the boosted air will make it go rich/lean, or is the difference to small to matter
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Jan 19, 2008
#6
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #6
You can basically use any MAF in either draw through or blow through in a properly designed sytem with no ill effects or decreased range. But the kicker here is a "properly designed system". What this means is you have to maintain the integrity of laminar airflow though the MAF. If you take a 90mm (about 4") and neck it down to 3" tubing, you'll disrupt laminar airflow and never get a clean signal - the result will be horrid driveability that cannot be 'tuned around'.

In the case of a 90mm MAF, you'll need 4" tubing ahead of and behind the MAF for as long as you can fit it - our 95 Turbo car has 4" tubing and it was a bear to fit it all in a nice straight run. My turbo Lightning has the same thing. If you run reducers right off the MAF or near the MAF you risk having issues. I know someone will come on and say they do this with no problems, but in our experience of tuning hundreds of blow through cars, for 99% of them what I said is true.

My Lightning even had an issue with stright 4" connectors off the MAF, so we had a MAF 'saddle' machined to match a 90mm LMAF, then welded it right on a section of 4" pipe and put the electronics right in the pipe. The result is, for both our turbo vehicles, driveability like stock - and the Mustang is a 700 RWHP vehicle, the Lightning is 500+ RWHP.

Why didn't we just go with draw through and avoid all this? With a turbo, usually bigger turbos, the mass of the turbo wheel causes it to keep spinning for a bit when you lift the throttle, this spin-down created a MAF backwash that cannot be tuned around in most cases and causes stalls after you lift. The cure for this is to lengthen the inlet tube before the MAF - this adds more air volume which buffers the backwash - and in our cases, there just was not enough room. We chose option #2: go to a properly designed blow through setup.

We have tuned a few blow through cars with the Professional Mass Air blow through tubes (3") and they work really well - those of you who have read my previous posts know I was never a big fan of 'calibrated' MAFs because usually the calibration is not even close - but I found out the quality of the PMAS units we have used are really good and the numbers from the flowsheets are pretty accurate. I like them so much that we became a dealer for them.

Hope this helps!

Don
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
2006 mustang gt has high clutch bite
  • leevikisley
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
166
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Feb 22, 2026
leevikisley
L
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
328
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
R
Dart shp, should i buy this?
  • ryanmichael33
  • May 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
98
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
ryanmichael33
R
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
255
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
O
1978 Mustang II Headliner Install
  • onusideburns
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
4
Views
357
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 9, 2026
Enzio
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?