• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Ground Clearance

  • Thread starter Thread starter KreagerM
  • Start date Start date Feb 17, 2011
K

KreagerM

Member
Nov 24, 2005
88
0
6
Maryland
Feb 17, 2011
#1
  • Feb 17, 2011
  • #1
All you guys running long tubes with lowered cars, what's your ground clearance like? Right now I'm about 2" maybe a little more at the collector. Anyone one else running low? Are you having any "running a ground" issues? Besides the obvious speed bump issues.
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Feb 17, 2011
#2
  • Feb 17, 2011
  • #2
Different brands of longtubes will hang lower/higher. What brand are you running? one of the Hooker models are notorious for being low. I'm installing MAC longtubes and upon test fit it doesn't look like they'll be more than 1/2" below the frame rail. Have you checked your motor mounts? I *think* the conv. mounts are lower.
Jon
 
6

65coupe408w

Member
Mar 26, 2010
192
0
16
Feb 18, 2011
#3
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #3
Im running hooker super comps on mine. I also have the ron morris drop mounts. That said I have 17 inch wheels which I think probably raise the car a little, also victor jr raied port heads. Never had much of a clearance issue with the headers.

When I was running 14's and had a set of hedmans on the 289 those used to scrape on speed bumps. There is deffinitley some variation between the brands.
 
K

KreagerM

Member
Nov 24, 2005
88
0
6
Maryland
Feb 18, 2011
#4
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #4
I'm running hedman Lt headers (they hang very low), with stock 65 mounts. I'll eventually go with shorties (if i need to), but not till after the summer.

Until then I'll continue avoiding all speed bumps.
 
6

68EFIvert

Member
Jan 13, 2007
639
0
17
Camas, Washington
Feb 18, 2011
#5
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #5
I was using Headman long tube headers with RonMorris lowering mounts. I sold those headers to go with JBA shorty's due to gound clearance. It was ok most of the time but speed bumps in parking lots got me. I think I only scraped them a few time but for as little as I drive mey car that was a few too many. I hate having parts that don't work well with the rest of the car. I will not have problems with my JBA's.
 
K

KreagerM

Member
Nov 24, 2005
88
0
6
Maryland
Feb 18, 2011
#6
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #6
68EFIvert said:
I was using Headman long tube headers with RonMorris lowering mounts. I sold those headers to go with JBA shorty's due to gound clearance. It was ok most of the time but speed bumps in parking lots got me. I think I only scraped them a few time but for as little as I drive mey car that was a few too many. I hate having parts that don't work well with the rest of the car. I will not have problems with my JBA's.
Click to expand...


Looks like I'm gonna have to go that route. After looking into it more these hedmans have to go. I want to drive the car and not worry about little bumps
 

Shakin66

Founding Member
Jan 19, 2001
628
1
19
Waycross, Ga / Lake James, NC
Feb 18, 2011
#7
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #7
<a href="http://s32.photobucket.com/albums/d6/scatpro/Shakin/?action=view&amp;current=Picture229.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d6/scatpro/Shakin/Picture229.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
<a href="http://s32.photobucket.com/albums/d6/scatpro/Shakin/?action=view&amp;current=Picture228.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d6/scatpro/Shakin/Picture228.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>
 

S-Car-Go

Member
Mar 25, 2003
332
0
16
San Jose, CA
Feb 18, 2011
#8
  • Feb 18, 2011
  • #8
I have FPA LT step headers and they do not hang lower that the frame rails. Somtimes my sub frame connectors will hit a speed bump but never the exhaust.
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
Feb 19, 2011
#9
  • Feb 19, 2011
  • #9
I have Ford Powertrain headers too and love them. They tuck up nice and tight, even with my lowered engine. My ground clearance was 3/4" at the headers before the FPAs. Now the lowest point is the bellhousing. Used to get caught on everything, but I went with a taller wheel/tire combo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Repeated P2004 DTC trouble code with no apparent symptoms
  • poehitman
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
158
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Mar 12, 2026
poehitman
P
Electrical 88 EEC Injectors batch firing ?
  • Dustin 86GT
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
381
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2026
gkomo
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
132
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Tunerstudio help / services
  • Kabuki_notch
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
232
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 2, 2026
Mustang5L5
F
2004 Mustang GT – Fuel Pump Not Priming
  • Fayio
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
173
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2026
n0v8or
N
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?