• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

GT40P heads in a '67 289 'Stang???

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cmyheini67
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2004
C

Cmyheini67

New Member
Dec 10, 2004
1
0
0
Dec 10, 2004
#1
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #1
Anybody swap a set of C6AE heads for a sweet pair of GT40P's? How much did this mod cost? My '67 notchback set up:

#(289 + .30), port matched stock heads
#Erson Street/Strip Cam -- 294 deg duration/.504" valve lift
#Reworked C4 w/ shift kit...2800 stall converter....8" w/ 3.70s
#Edlebrock Performer RPM high-rise intake manifold
#Edlebrock 600cfm Performer carb
#Hooker headers w/ 1 5/8" primaries...3" collectors
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Dec 10, 2004
#2
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #2
you will probably need new headers (also unlikely to be as good as yours), and GT40Ps are pretty weak heads... probably the weakest aftermarket head out there. If your current heads are ported well, the power difference won't be much. I'd say stick with your current ones unless you go with a better set of heads.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Dec 10, 2004
#3
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #3
I can confirm the header problem.
We mocked a set of P heads up on a car not to long ago... the headers were a terrible fit.
Not only do the plugs have less angle, they are moved laterally along the head.
The plugs are under the primary pipes on most cylinders, instead of under and over.
It doesn't look bad until you bolt the headers up, otherwise we wouldn't have gotten as far as we did.
Dave
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 10, 2004
#4
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #4
SadbutTrue said:
you will probably need new headers (also unlikely to be as good as yours), and GT40Ps are pretty weak heads... probably the weakest aftermarket head out there. If your current heads are ported well, the power difference won't be much. I'd say stick with your current ones unless you go with a better set of heads.
Click to expand...

I find it odd that the best flowing GT40 heads are the GT40P's
 
D

dmoody

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
789
0
17
Winston-Salem, NC
Dec 10, 2004
#5
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #5
I'm going to be putting GT40P heads on my 68. I did have to buy special headers from CJ Pony Parts. I think the manufacturer of these headers only produced a limited run of them because I know they aren't offered anymore.

Anyway the GT40P heads are supposed to be the best production heads Ford has ever offered for the 302. Now if you're expecting the heads to flow as well as the Edelbrock, AFR, twisted wedge, etc then you're dreaming. But they far outflow anything else you'll get from Ford unless you get a professional to port them. The reason why the spark plug is in such a strange location is to get a better flame travel from the spark and thus a more efficient burn. This helps power and gas mileage.

d
 

SandSprite

Member
Feb 8, 2003
332
0
16
L.A., CA
Dec 10, 2004
#6
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #6
To answer the question-- it's hard to say. You will lose compression since the heads you have are 54cc and the gt40p are about 60cc, but they out flow the 66 heads.
http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/flowdata/castiron.htm
http://www.stangpro.com/html/articles/gt40p_files/gt40p1.htm

GT40P's are one of the best Ford heads put on a production car. The header issue makes them less desirable though. I am looking to get a 1999 explorer 5.0, but I haven't decided on which headers to go with. MAC makes some that are supposed to fit, and both central coast mustang and ford power train make P headers.

http://www.macperformance.com/store/category.cfm?SID=3&Category_ID=346
http://shop.centralcoastmustang.net/osb/showitem.cfm?Category=2
http://www.fordpowertrain.com/Headers.htm
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 11, 2004
#7
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #7
SandSprite said:
To answer the question-- it's hard to say.

GT40P's are one of the best Ford heads put on a production car.
Click to expand...
They came on car motors? What cars?
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 11, 2004
#8
  • Dec 11, 2004
  • #8
D.Hearne said:
They came on car motors? What cars?
Click to expand...

the GT40 duh
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 12, 2004
#9
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #9
65fastback2+2 said:
the GT40 duh
Click to expand...
Oops! you let Fords best kept secret out. Now everyone's gonna know the GT40's been back in production since 1996.
 
M

mustangracer

Founding Member
Jun 15, 1999
360
0
0
Southern California
Dec 13, 2004
#10
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #10
According to fletch's 5.0 page the P heads flow 12-17% better than any other ford stock head. And yes they were stock on the later 5.0 explorers. So if your swapping in an explorer engine, I wouldn't be in a hurry to ditch them, if you are concerned about cost. They also flow better enough on the exhaust that you shouldn't run a split pattern cam with them, which unfortunately I didn't know before I installed mine.

I used them on my 289 with pretty good results. I suppose after the total between heads & headers I could maybe have gotten TFS or something, but then I would have also needed pushrods/guideplates/rocker arms also, which were included in the heads I bought.

They are a good middle ground for someone looking to run a reliable street engine though. And the lean burn design probably helped me get a 22 mpg average driving cross country even with a 650 4bbl and hotter cam.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Dec 13, 2004
#11
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #11
best ford production head isn't as big a deal as most of you guys make it out to be. None of the GT40 heads are known to be huge performers. The fact that he will lose compression and have to settle for special headers (which are likely a compromise design and won't flow as well as his current one) will offset much of the gains he makes.

Save up for a decent set of Performer RPM heads or something of that sort. For six or seven hundred you can have a head that is better in pretty much every way.
 
F

Fireracer34

New Member
Mar 25, 2020
5
0
1
Prunedale, CA
Mar 25, 2020
#12
  • Mar 25, 2020
  • #12
SadbutTrue said:
you will probably need new headers (also unlikely to be as good as yours), and GT40Ps are pretty weak heads... probably the weakest aftermarket head out there. If your current heads are ported well, the power difference won't be much. I'd say stick with your current ones unless you go with a better set of heads.
Click to expand...


I hope this helps somebody, these headers work on GT40"P" heads and with a AOD transmission.
Sanderson Headers FF3GTS-SEC
After so many fails and time, I wanted to share. See the pictures.
Doug
 

Attachments

  • Drivers Side GT40P Headers (2).webp
    205.9 KB · Views: 1,434
  • Passenger Side GT40P Heads and Headers (2).webp
    198.3 KB · Views: 1,871

geoklass

Active Member
Sep 3, 2018
108
34
38
Monrovia, California
Apr 2, 2020
#13
  • Apr 2, 2020
  • #13
RCI offers Long Tube Headers that will work with the GT-40P head, and clear the spark plugs...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
For Sale 1986 Capstang (Part Capri & part Mustang) $12,000 Galena, Ohio
  • BubbaG
  • Aug 7, 2022
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Aug 7, 2022
General karthief
3
New Member: 1978 M II Mach I
  • 351MooseStang
  • May 24, 2019
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
12
Views
3K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 30, 2019
351MooseStang
3
Engine '67 Mustang 289 V8 Loose Rocker Arm Polylock Nuts Wtf?
  • cjstang6791
  • Jul 19, 2016
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
3K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 20, 2016
cjstang6791
'67 Mustang 289 V8 Loose Rocker Arm Polylock Nuts Wtf?
  • cjstang6791
  • Jul 18, 2016
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 19, 2016
cjstang6791
'67 Mustang 289 V8 Rocker Arm Poly Lock Nuts Keep Coming Loose. Wtf?
  • cjstang6791
  • Jul 18, 2016
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
3K
The Welcome Wagon Jul 18, 2016
Davedacarpainter
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?