• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

GT500 in the 11s sans pulley swap.

  • Thread starter Thread starter CatmanJJ
  • Start date Start date Aug 22, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Aug 22, 2006
#1
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #1
So much for being too heavy.

Video (Right-Click, Save Target As)

Thread

Photos
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Aug 22, 2006
#2
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #2
Well the only way to overcome being a two ton tessy is brute power which that car has! Imagine that setup in a fox That would be fun...
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Aug 22, 2006
#3
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #3
my god the mods over there are ****ing jerk-offs. So glad I never registered on that site.

what? you dont love everything made by Ford? Banned LOL :sucking ****:
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#4
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #4
helty said:
my god the mods over there are ****ing jerk-offs. So glad I never registered on that site.

what? you dont love everything made by Ford? Banned LOL :sucking ****:
Click to expand...
Brandon....classic.
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Aug 22, 2006
#5
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #5
I'll stand behind my Stangnet Mods/Admin to the Death

Really though, its like "oh, you're not gonna suck this guys cack for being the first GT500 in the 11's? GTFO Troll! I'll ban you with my uber cool ban stick! Ford Rules Cheby Drools! SVTPerf.com mods FTW LOL! View attachment 446530


Back on topic, Im happy for the guys at Evolution, thats an awesome accolmplishment that they should be proud of. Im sure the times will drop as they get more practice and the car racks up some miles (only 47, all dyno and track miles!). But at least let people voice some constructive criticism. As long as they arent being little Eddie Haskells, whats the big deal? Every other post by a mod included a threat with the ban stick. E-Police

And DropTop, that motor in a Fox would be absolutely disgusting. MMFF slapped a Lightning motor in a Notch a few years back, I'd like to see your idea come to fruition as a project car down the road
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Aug 22, 2006
#6
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #6
helty said:
I'll stand behind my Stangnet Mods/Admin to the Death

Really though, its like "oh, you're not gonna suck this guys cack for being the first GT500 in the 11's? GTFO Troll! I'll ban you with my uber cool ban stick! Ford Rules Cheby Drools! SVTPerf.com mods FTW LOL! View attachment 446526


Back on topic, Im happy for the guys at Evolution, thats an awesome accolmplishment that they should be proud of. Im sure the times will drop as they get more practice and the car racks up some miles (only 47, all dyno and track miles!). But at least let people voice some constructive criticism. As long as they arent being little Eddie Haskells, whats the big deal? Every other post by a mod included a threat with the ban stick. E-Police

And DropTop, that motor in a Fox would be absolutely disgusting. MMFF slapped a Lightning motor in a Notch a few years back, I'd like to see your idea come to fruition as a project car down the road
Click to expand...

yeah I was trying to read that thread and I was blown away by the number of ban threats that the mods were dishing out. Helt, your posts are making me laugh out loud @ work, I'm probably gonna get fired haha.

GT500 motor in a notch redefines the word "sick"
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Aug 22, 2006
#7
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #7
11.80s with the stock pulley isnt too bad. But with a full drag setup (Drs, skinnies, suspension) + intake/exhaust/tune, I seriously would have expected more. Especialy from the trap speed .

PLEASE DONT BAN ME
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Aug 22, 2006
#8
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #8
im not impressed
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#9
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #9
streetstang03 said:
im not impressed
Click to expand...
So you're depressed?
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Aug 22, 2006
#10
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #10
not since you're back <3
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#11
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #11
Awwwww....
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Aug 22, 2006
#12
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #12
Hooray Stangnet! View attachment 446524
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Aug 22, 2006
#13
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #13
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#14
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #14
Double whaaa?
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Aug 22, 2006
#15
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #15


thanks bud
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Aug 22, 2006
#16
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #16
This thread has been derailed with the help of an Admin View attachment 446522
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#17
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #17
helty said:
This thread has been derailed with the help of an Admin View attachment 446520
Click to expand...
With a few clicks, it can be set atop the rails again.
 

Maza4ever14

New Member
Apr 27, 2005
187
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Aug 22, 2006
#18
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #18
HUH?
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Aug 22, 2006
#19
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #19
Might not be that impressive but I still think it's pretty cool. With some weight reduction, pulley and the driver mod this car I'm guessing could be pretty close to the 10s @ close to 130 mph without touching the internals. That fugger does look heavy coming off the line though dohn it?
 

timeless2

Vi Veri Veni Versum Vicus Vici
Admin Dude
Nov 29, 1999
1,366
202
154
the Shadow Gallery
Aug 22, 2006
#20
  • Aug 22, 2006
  • #20
CatmanJJ said:
Might not be that impressive but I still think it's pretty cool. With some weight reduction, pulley and the driver mod this car I'm guessing could be pretty close to the 10s without touching the internals.
Click to expand...
Hear that folks? Catman Van Damme's heading towards a paradigm shift.

I'd take one (gt500), in any shape or form.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
766
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
632
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Forced Induction Total Timing under boost
  • Dontknowchit
  • Aug 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
334
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2025
Dontknowchit
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?