• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Guys with PA Racing K-Memebers in here!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter WhiteDevil
  • Start date Start date Jul 5, 2006

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jul 5, 2006
#1
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #1
Just a quick question i just put in my order and for the part where it asks about motor mounts, (none, 5.0, 4.6, or chevy) i said none. I thought it meant did i want them to include stock 5.0 motor mounts with it. Is that what it is, or does it have to do with the way the weld the motor mounting points to the K-member?? If so then im going to have to call first thing in the morning and tell them change it. Thanks guys
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jul 5, 2006
#2
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #2
ttt anyone?
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Jul 5, 2006
#3
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #3
call them anyway---just to be safe
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jul 5, 2006
#4
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #4
UPDATE:

PA Racing has good customer service. They emailed me just now to make sure that i did not need motor mounting points, and to make sure that i was not confused. I told them that i needed the standard 5.0 mounting points. So all should be good.
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Jul 5, 2006
#5
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #5
I just saw this and was going to tell you that you needed to include that you wanted motor mounts. You can get it without mounts if you run a motor plate in a race only application. Jason (PA Racing) has some of the best customer service in the industry!
 

LoudToy958

Member
Mar 30, 2005
435
0
16
Bremerton, WA
Jul 5, 2006
#6
  • Jul 5, 2006
  • #6
Cool to see you finally working on the suspension again. You doing this to finally fix that front end issue you were having? Or just doin it because of the added benefit/

Make sure you get some pics for that motor build you have goin on . I would really like to see this. Talk soon man.............Shane
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Jul 6, 2006
#7
  • Jul 6, 2006
  • #7
LoudToy958 said:
Cool to see you finally working on the suspension again. You doing this to finally fix that front end issue you were having? Or just doin it because of the added benefit/

Make sure you get some pics for that motor build you have goin on . I would really like to see this. Talk soon man.............Shane
Click to expand...
Well im doing it because of the added benefit and with the engine out there is no better time. But i do hope that it clears up that front end issue have. I have some ?s for you about suspension. Did you make it so that i can email you yet? Thanks bro
 

LoudToy958

Member
Mar 30, 2005
435
0
16
Bremerton, WA
Jul 7, 2006
#8
  • Jul 7, 2006
  • #8
WhiteDevil said:
Well im doing it because of the added benefit and with the engine out there is no better time. But i do hope that it clears up that front end issue have. I have some ?s for you about suspension. Did you make it so that i can email you yet? Thanks bro
Click to expand...

Yes, you can e-mail. I can that issue resolved.
 

fawcett

Member
Sep 10, 2003
380
0
16
Cohasset, Ma
Jul 8, 2006
#9
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #9
Sorry to jack this thread but while we're at it:
Is this K-member thought to be the best bang for the buck piece in its field? I heard UPR/qa1 products are fairly weak and have been known to fail. Can anyone vouch for this? I heard the PA Racing k-member is strong and built to last and its been on my mind.
-fawcett
 

LoudToy958

Member
Mar 30, 2005
435
0
16
Bremerton, WA
Jul 8, 2006
#10
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #10
fawcett said:
Sorry to jack this thread but while we're at it:
Is this K-member thought to be the best bang for the buck piece in its field? I heard UPR/qa1 products are fairly weak and have been known to fail. Can anyone vouch for this? I heard the PA Racing k-member is strong and built to last and its been on my mind.
-fawcett
Click to expand...

To be honest, if you get a few upgrades on it, it is the same price as the MM unit. I have been torn between the two for some time now.
 

loudpedal99

New Member
Aug 30, 2005
160
0
0
ND
Jul 8, 2006
#11
  • Jul 8, 2006
  • #11
fawcett said:
Sorry to jack this thread but while we're at it:
Is this K-member thought to be the best bang for the buck piece in its field? I heard UPR/qa1 products are fairly weak and have been known to fail. Can anyone vouch for this? I heard the PA Racing k-member is strong and built to last and its been on my mind.
-fawcett
Click to expand...

+1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
172
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
516
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?