• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

h pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blake22
  • Start date Start date May 10, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
B

Blake22

Member
Mar 22, 2010
65
0
6
May 10, 2010
#1
  • May 10, 2010
  • #1
whats the difference from buying a o/r h pipe from me just getting my cats cut off wouldnt it be about the same since gts come stock with an h pipe
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
May 10, 2010
#2
  • May 10, 2010
  • #2
For the most part it is the same thing. If you want to be monstrously technical about it a steel pipe that has been formed without having any cuts and welds inside will have less turbulence then a mandrel bent unit you buy etc. etc. etc.

In the real world unless you're willing to do the job (cutting/welding) yourself a lot of shops will stay away from the sort of thing because tampering with emission controls is very much illegal, so if you do find the odd person to do that for you it comes down to how neatly and how cheaply the job gets done so it may be just cheaper to go for the aftermarket unit.
 

charged07gt

New Member
Apr 20, 2010
31
0
0
May 10, 2010
#3
  • May 10, 2010
  • #3
Instead of going thru the headache of cutting and welding to remove the cats, u can just take ur H-pipe off and hollow-out the cats! Just a thought.
 

arcwcb

Member
Oct 26, 2009
417
2
19
Pennsylvania
May 10, 2010
#4
  • May 10, 2010
  • #4
I've seen a LOT of stuff about people going to o/r mid pipes. I thought the stock mid-pipe from the factory actually had really high flow cats and that you don't REALLY see much of a gain from losing them (maybe 3-5hp) until you are pushing some major power, like 700+ RWHP... Am I wrong, I don't remember where I heard/read this...
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
May 10, 2010
#5
  • May 10, 2010
  • #5
arcwcb said:
I've seen a LOT of stuff about people going to o/r mid pipes. I thought the stock mid-pipe from the factory actually had really high flow cats and that you don't REALLY see much of a gain from losing them (maybe 3-5hp) until you are pushing some major power, like 700+ RWHP... Am I wrong, I don't remember where I heard/read this...
Click to expand...

+1 real power in these cars exhaust wise comes from long-tube setups and even those really need F/I to push out good power gains.
 

gmantheman

Member
Dec 30, 2007
483
1
16
Escondido, CA
May 10, 2010
#6
  • May 10, 2010
  • #6
I ran an o/r prochamber for two weeks. I felt a loss of power down low and the dyno confirmed this. With stock catted H my car dynoed 297RWHP/308RWTQ. With the O/R Prochamber my car dynoed 302RWHP but only 305RWQ. When I had hi-flow cats welded in I was at 305RWHP/312RWTQ. Also the hi-flows produced the best sound. O/R midpipes tend to be a little sloppy sounding.
 
B

Blake22

Member
Mar 22, 2010
65
0
6
May 10, 2010
#7
  • May 10, 2010
  • #7
well the reason i want to take my cats off is because my brother just got flows put on his stang and it really isnt any louder but his is an 04 dont know if that really makes a difference the guy that put them on told him he would cut his cats off if he wanted him to
 

walter

Founding Member
Aug 13, 1998
1,054
0
46
Houston TX
May 11, 2010
#8
  • May 11, 2010
  • #8
With an 04 the issue with catalytic converters is a bit different because those particular models have like 2 or 3 cats per side and they don't flow particularly well. With the S197s there is only one cat per cylinder bank and they are good flowing units.
 
C

COBESGT

Member
Oct 19, 2004
231
0
16
Dubuque, Iowa
May 11, 2010
#9
  • May 11, 2010
  • #9
Be warned if you put an O/R H-Pipe on a 2005 - up GT, you may not be happy with the resulting sound. I speak from personal experience. The sound gets very raspy when the VCT kicks in and it's very loud. The 2005 - up GT's do not respond as well to the Flows like all the earlier models did.
 

arcwcb

Member
Oct 26, 2009
417
2
19
Pennsylvania
May 11, 2010
#10
  • May 11, 2010
  • #10
I don't really recommend losing the cats, I've heard a lot of people complain about the sound, there is really no performance to be had, unless you do it yourself you'd be spending more money, and it's a mod that really doesn't give you any horsepower while, depending on the state, makes your car not pass inspection. I don't really see how losing the cats is worth it...
 

chgovfk

15 Year Member
Apr 17, 2007
531
28
59
AZ
May 11, 2010
#11
  • May 11, 2010
  • #11
I have a O/R H pipe and I saved the stock H pipe for emissions - so I went with 'shorties' so I could switch it back ....although I did them at the same time - pypes shorties + O/R H ...to me it really gave the car a growel - woke it up - for sound and punch power.
 
B

Blake22

Member
Mar 22, 2010
65
0
6
May 11, 2010
#12
  • May 11, 2010
  • #12
so what exhaust set up would yall recommend me getting im going for better sound rather than performance
 

Undisputed

New Member
Dec 4, 2009
306
0
0
Westchester County NY
May 11, 2010
#13
  • May 11, 2010
  • #13
Blake22 said:
so what exhaust set up would yall recommend me getting im going for better sound rather than performance
Click to expand...

How loud do u want it?? Listen to mine (grabber blue 2010) in the video in my sig, it has BBK Equal Length Tuned Shorty Headers, and an off-road X-Pipe, AND, IN THE VID IT STILL HAS STOCK MUFFLERS!! SO, IF U WANT THAT VOLUME AND SOUND, THAST HOW, IF YOU WANT LOUDER, CHANGE MUFFLERS.. SINCE THEN I CHANGED TO CUSTOM STAINLESS STEEL MUFFLERS, BUT I THOUGHT THE SOUND W/ TUNED SHORTIES AND O/R X-PIPE AND STOCK MUFFLERS WAS PRETTY NICE, AND HAD NO DRONE!!
 
B

Blake22

Member
Mar 22, 2010
65
0
6
May 11, 2010
#14
  • May 11, 2010
  • #14
yours sounds good but i want a little louder nice car by the way
 

chgovfk

15 Year Member
Apr 17, 2007
531
28
59
AZ
May 11, 2010
#15
  • May 11, 2010
  • #15
You can go to u-tube and listen to the differences between X pipe or H pipe - Whether to go Long tubes or shorties - I would go L/T's - for the amount of work it takes to install them - you might as well put the L/T's in - I went w/'shorties' b/c of the strict emissions out here in AZ.....one day I'll have to switch back to the stock H - I personally think the H-pipe is the way to go for more of a loud hotrod sound - the X pipe is too 'rice burner' sounding raspy.....just my thoughts.....
 

arcwcb

Member
Oct 26, 2009
417
2
19
Pennsylvania
May 11, 2010
#16
  • May 11, 2010
  • #16
Sorry to anybody with an x-pipe, but +1 on the "rice" comment, it just doesn't sound like a mustang to me when an x is on there, especially o/r... But everybody has their own opinion...
 

gmantheman

Member
Dec 30, 2007
483
1
16
Escondido, CA
May 11, 2010
#17
  • May 11, 2010
  • #17
Both set-ups I run, glasspacks/resonators, SLP LM and glasspacks/glasspacks, MACs sound awesome with my catted X. These two set-ups sound nothing like rice or tuner.
 

gmantheman

Member
Dec 30, 2007
483
1
16
Escondido, CA
May 11, 2010
#18
  • May 11, 2010
  • #18
For having an x-pipe, these mustangs sound pretty damn good.

YouTube - 1967 Mustang 3" Exhaust

YouTube - 1969 Mustang w/ Hooker Aero chambers
 

arcwcb

Member
Oct 26, 2009
417
2
19
Pennsylvania
May 11, 2010
#19
  • May 11, 2010
  • #19
Well of course a 351W is gonna have a good sound, it's hard to make a 351 sound like a ricer no matter what exhaust you put on it...
 
B

Blake22

Member
Mar 22, 2010
65
0
6
May 12, 2010
#20
  • May 12, 2010
  • #20
well i found a clip on you tube of a mustang with o/r h and flowmasters it sounds pretty good so i will prob go with that set up the only thing is i heard flowmaters cut some of your power
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
335
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
640
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
S
1998 Mustang Gt Rattling sound, cannot locate. Video included
  • studerman1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
157
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2026
studerman1
S
F
H-PIPE WIDTH
  • forango
  • May 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 28, 2025
LILCBRA
J
O2 sens
  • JJ's90fox
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
166
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 12, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?