• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Handheld Tuner Tune vs Shop Tune

  • Thread starter Thread starter topless98gt
  • Start date Start date May 17, 2005

topless98gt

Adhesive Feces
Mar 31, 2005
182
0
17
Arlington, TX
May 17, 2005
#1
  • May 17, 2005
  • #1
I was wondering if there was any difference in buying a tuner and tuning your car yourself or having a shop tune your car. Do they both tune the same stuff? If so -- why do people pay $150/hr to get their friggen car tuned on the dyno?!?!
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
May 17, 2005
#2
  • May 17, 2005
  • #2
Its a better tune. Made for your specific car. The tuners are a safe generic tune. You can tweek the generic tune but you better know what the hell you are doing. You need to monitor your air to fuel ratio. Thats why a dyno tune is the best and safest way.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
May 17, 2005
#3
  • May 17, 2005
  • #3
There different levels of what people consider a tune

1) Mail order tune.
A mail order assumes that everything on your car is in good working order. If so, they can design a tune around a list of your modifications. This is a little misleading to most people, because most bolt on mods do not need to be tuned around for performance. A car with longtubes will can run the same tune as one without. That is just the way MAF based fuel injection works. Now once you start changing injectors adding power adders ect. this is a different story.

2) Handheld tuners
The handheld tuners allow limited changes to different parameters in the EEC. In my opinion, for a N/A car these are better than a mail order tune, since you can adjust for things as they are added, but I personally wouldn't trust them with a power adder.

3) Dyno tune.
Dyno tunes are great for tweeking the most power out of a tune, but more importantly they will uncover any problems you may be having, and give you the piece of mind knowing the tune is within safe margins. Now the problem I have with "most" dyno tunes, is that they don't datalog what is going on with the engine, and they usually only tune WOT conditions. Example: although factor MAF's are very close, the factory curve is never perfect. A WOT dyno tune would add or subtract fuel in certain rpm ranges to correct for this only under WOT, where as road tuning the MAF curve would correct the issue under all circumstances. This takes much more time to do though.

4) Road tuning (the best method)
This is the method I chose. You really only have a few options to do this. Either be in good with a tuner who will spend hours road tuning your car, or learn to do it yourself. You need the abilty to both datalog, and write to the EEC through either a chip or flash cable. You also need a wideband o2 sensor. For this your options are products SCT PRP, Tweecer, and EEC Tuner. I went with Tweecer because of the price, although SCT seems to be much easier to use. With these tools you can tune for driveabilty as well as WOT. The reason this is better, is because you tune the base sensors that the EEC depends on to make adjustments.

Now, all of these methods allow for the changing of basic scalars, like gear ratios, turning off rear o2 test, etc.
 

stangman16

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
640
4
29
San Antonio, TX
May 17, 2005
#4
  • May 17, 2005
  • #4
do you have any additional information about Road tuning? or any links on learning how to tune like that?
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
May 17, 2005
#5
  • May 17, 2005
  • #5
stangman16 said:
do you have any additional information about Road tuning? or any links on learning how to tune like that?
Click to expand...

You can start here.
http://tweecer.oplnk.net/viewforum.php?f=2 and dig around. there is some good info there.
 

stangman16

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
640
4
29
San Antonio, TX
May 17, 2005
#6
  • May 17, 2005
  • #6
thanks for the link!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
258
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
797
Digital Self-tuning Forum 20 minutes ago
X-cam34
X
G
Octane on the 5.0 Coyote
  • gray owl
  • May 17, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
7
Views
248
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk May 27, 2026
Bullitt347
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
301
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Stand alone vs chip tune (for noob)
  • nicholase
  • Jan 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?