• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Has anybody done a 289 roller lifter conversion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rapid
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2009
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 16, 2009
#1
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #1
I have searched and Googled and still really don't know what is really necessary.

I am about to pull down a freshley re-built 289 that may have wiped a cam lobe.

It was broken in properly.

I re-built it because it wiped a lobe at about 24K miles after a cam change. I have the money and would like to eleiminate the need for special oil or additives over the long haul. Sooo...

Can I:

Install the Comp Cams ladder bar roller lifters w/o pulling heads?

I know I'll have to get diferent push rods and dist. gear.

Starting with a roller block would have been an intelligent and cost efficient option if I were startng the re-build over. I am wary of putting another flat tappet in.

BTW, Comp Cams are very responsive and are working with me and the XE268H with 9:1 compression, RPM heads and Intake, MSD ignition, 500 CFM performer carb, is a blast to drive.

Now if I can just make it quiet...
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 16, 2009
#2
  • Jan 16, 2009
  • #2
my understanding is that they just aren't cost effective.

I haven't seen anything on line yet that actually pencils out......
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 17, 2009
#3
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #3
It seems to break down like this.

500 for the cam and lifters
40 for the pushrods
40 for the distributor gear
another 50 for gaskets and such

not having to use 11 dollor a quart oil or regular oil with additive and not having to changes cams again in a couple of weeks.

I drive mine daily and have to have some reliabilty. I will eventually buy a rollor block and do another build but need to go today.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Jan 17, 2009
#4
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #4
I ran a google search on "roller short block" and there are a bunch of hits. THere is a 5.0 roller short block for $200. Strokers, 351 roller short blocks, etc. CHeck out the Craigslist hits, you may find one near you. I know this is not what you want, but the cost is extream for wht you want to do, and when you go to a roller block later on, you will never get you rmoney back out of that 289...
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 17, 2009
#5
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #5
Well, if you have the money, then put another flat tappet back in, and buy a roller for when you have time to swap it out....
Best of both works, and you should be able to make up some of the cost selling the 289....
 

Tony R

New Member
May 29, 2008
102
0
0
Vancouver Wa
Jan 17, 2009
#6
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #6
the machine shop that has my block suggested that we do a roller sut up. He said there is a kit that goes in a stock 289 block that doesnt require machine work. This route would be alot cheaper for me than him machining the block.
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 17, 2009
#7
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #7
Go ahead and post up that kit info, I'm sure there are a lot of folks here who would be interested in that..
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 17, 2009
#8
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #8
while i havent put it together yet, i have a retrofit roller cam from comp cams that allow the use of a roller cam in an early block, while using the stock ford roller lifters. you do need the retrofit roller kit as well that includes a modified spider, and a few other items that allow you to install everything without machine work.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jan 17, 2009
#9
  • Jan 17, 2009
  • #9
Here is some of the info I found when I posed a similar question recently: http://forums.stangnet.com/766868-retrofit-roller-lifter-options.html

Seems a set of retrofit lifters can be had anywhere from about $240- $600+. Past that, I think youve got the rest of it figured out.
Heres an updated eBay link: http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Part....c0.m245&_trkparms=72:543|65:12|39:1|240:1318
 
R

Rapid

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
297
1
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 18, 2009
#10
  • Jan 18, 2009
  • #10
Looks like fixing mine will just involve replacing one lifter so I will start looking for a roller block to rebuild for the future.

Thanks for the input!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
255
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
831
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
2
Bought an engine for my project
  • 2stroke1971
  • Jul 7, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2024
limp
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine Roller Rocker to Valve Retainer Interference - Possible Source of Valve Train Noise
  • AeroCoupe
  • May 22, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?