• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Has anyone checked out AJE's new front end?

  • Thread starter Thread starter okibono
  • Start date Start date Mar 2, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 11
Next
First Prev 2 of 11 Next Last

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 7, 2007
#21
  • Mar 7, 2007
  • #21
Sure hope the put something in there to strengthen the top of the shock towers. Sure looks like its going to put alot more leverage at the top without the upper control arm. I would think it would want to flex the fenders in like that. (Dont see it as part of the kit?)
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Mar 8, 2007
#22
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #22
But my question is how much space are you gaining for mucho mongo headers? Because that is the reason I want a front suspension swap, I can deal with the weight I just want more space for some big 1 7/8 to 2" step headers for a new motor...
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 8, 2007
#23
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #23
I will get exact measurements for you. But basically, you are notching to the OUTSIDE of the frame rail. You can measure that and that will be your area gained!
 

68rustang

Active Member
Jan 17, 2003
1,537
0
36
Cleveland, OH
Mar 8, 2007
#24
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #24
How long have you worked for AJE?
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Mar 8, 2007
#25
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #25
68rustang said:
How long have you worked for AJE?
Click to expand...
He doesn't. He lives in S.D. and owns his own company. I'll be building his turbo kit soon. This will make it easier on me. But I know he was looking for feedback.
 

67 Evil Eleanor

New Member
Nov 22, 2006
66
0
0
SW Virginia
Mar 8, 2007
#26
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #26
Mez perfers de "Mustang II" as opposed to dis one. Dus aint enouth dare for de doe.
 

68rustang

Active Member
Jan 17, 2003
1,537
0
36
Cleveland, OH
Mar 8, 2007
#27
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #27
Reading through the thread sure sounds like a sales pitch.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Mar 8, 2007
#28
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #28
Sounds like one to me too, or maybe extra discount. lol

still no answer on the top of the shock towers though? I take it that doesnt worry you at all?
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 8, 2007
#29
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #29
LOL, I could see how ya'll would think that...

But like 10 sec goal said, I don't work for them. I'm in SD. But for so long there hasn't been a product that really helps out the Mustangs/Cougars/Falcons/Mavericks/etc if you wanted to make them into a serious drag car.
But it is out there now. This helps us because sooo many of the 'street type' heads up classes require stock type suspension. This kits fits the bill in many heads up classes. I realize many folks love these cars for many different reasons. Personally, I like to go fast, and look stock.

Regards the upper shock mount, you could still use the firewall support if you desired. That would be no problem...

The more options we have, the better for all...
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 8, 2007
#30
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #30
Figured I'd complete the story...

The reason why I am talking about this is to get the word out. Alot of people want to go fast at the track. I am building a Turbocharged 70 Maverick with stock suspension, and looking to go 8's. So it is safe to say, I'm a bit off. But I, along with a few people I know personally, have avoided early Fords for heads up, stock suspension, type racing because there wasn't an available bolt on suspension modification that was (tounge and cheek) affordable, bolt on friendly, and accepted by the racing sanctions. Now there is.

When I started my project ,a MII front suspension wasn't and still isn't a legal option. So I spent every dime I could to get the front suspsion working right. Roller perches, Front spherical bearings, Strange brakes, notched towers, rear steer rack, blah blah blah. If this kit was out a year ago, I would have gone with it. But it wasn't so now I have to do things all over again.

There is a reason that the majority of the Fastest Street/Small tire type cars are Fox bodies. Because there is an aftermarket out there supporting those platforms. Here is some new technology to support our Early Ford platform, and I am glad to see it. Hopefully, others are too.

Sorry so long, I just want to make sure that its clear why I'm yapping so much.

Blown 65, I just wanted to add that I also have J bars coming out of my firewall, through the upper shock mounts, and down to the front frame. Since I am not turning any corners, that should firm things up nicely.

 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 8, 2007
#31
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #31
okibono said:
The reason why I am talking about this is to get the word out. Alot of people want to go fast at the track. I am building a Turbocharged 70 Maverick with stock suspension, and looking to go 8's. So it is safe to say, I'm a bit off. But I, along with a few people I know personally, have avoided early Fords for heads up, stock suspension, type racing because there wasn't an available bolt on suspension modification that was (tounge and cheek) affordable, bolt on friendly, and accepted by the racing sanctions. Now there is.

When I started my project ,a MII front suspension wasn't and still isn't a legal option. So I spent every dime I could to get the front suspsion working right. Roller perches, Front spherical bearings, Strange brakes, notched towers, rear steer rack, blah blah blah. If this kit was out a year ago, I would have gone with it. But it wasn't so now I have to do things all over again.

There is a reason that the majority of the Fastest Street/Small tire type cars are Fox bodies. Because there is an aftermarket out there supporting those platforms. Here is some new technology to support our Early Ford platform, and I am glad to see it. Hopefully, others are too.

Sorry so long, I just want to make sure that its clear why I'm yapping so much.

Blown 65, I just wanted to add that I also have J bars coming out of my firewall, through the upper shock mounts, and down to the front frame. Since I am not turning any corners, that should firm things up nicely.

Click to expand...



will your sanctioning body allow a front steer steup? i noticed you said you used a rear steer rack and the AJE setup is front steer not rear steer.
 
9

96 DOHC Cobra

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2001
542
0
16
Cerritos, CA
Mar 8, 2007
#32
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #32
okibono said:
They are available now....
Here is a link to the price:
http://www.ajeracing.com/64-70Mustang.php
Click to expand...


The website seems a bit heavy on price and low on info. I'd need to know a lot more about it before considering a purchase.
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 8, 2007
#33
  • Mar 8, 2007
  • #33
BNickle,
I guess I didn't come across clear, my fault. duh.
Originally, when we were modding the factory suspension, we were going to go w/ an Omni rear steer rack, attached to a modded belly bar.
Now, with this setup, we will use the front steer Pinto rack w/ bumpsteer kit.
And yes, the PSCA will allow this kit. What is cool is that alot of sanctioning bodies have already allowed similar kits for the early Nova's/Chevy II's. You know the Chebbies get the love first! Its all basically a bolt on front clip.

96 DOHC Cobra,
Yeah, it ain't the best. What specific question do you have regarding the kit? I may be able to answer it. Or you can give them a call. Jim, or Anthony were very helpful with me.

Thanks!
 

1320stang

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1998
4,329
23
89
Edmond, Oklahoma
Mar 9, 2007
#34
  • Mar 9, 2007
  • #34
Nemesis67 said:
$2300 - $2477!
I can get a MII set up for less from Heidts. At least the last time I checked.
I guess your paying for the ease of installation.
Click to expand...

Ta-Da!!! March special!!!

http://www.ajeracing.com/specials.php

For a straight line car, this should be the real deal. AJE has specialized in Fox and SN95 drag car parts. I'd bring the front bars from the cage thru the firewall, pick up the strut tower, then down to the front rails. It would be plenty strong. You can notch the towers back to gain some room.
 

jadesville

the polarbear conservation corps protects a polarb
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 8, 2003
2,189
0
47
Gresham, OR
Mar 10, 2007
#35
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #35
This makes me happy, I was going to drop more than $2150 on just a manual steering rack and control arms, for the price I'd think this is pretty much a steal. Now people who want to do DOHC conversions have another option when running with notched towers.
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Mar 10, 2007
#36
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #36
Sicarius428 said:
I was never greatly fond of it because as the suspension compresses the wheel doesn't stay level with the ground.
Click to expand...

I've heard that said several times about mcpherson strut. Surely the camber gain designed into the front suspension is similar in the different styles of independant front suspension - leading to the same performance with respect to suspension compression.

I know that the camber gain would start slowing and eventually change direction after a point, but that point (in a well-engineered setup) is beyond full suspension compression right?
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 10, 2007
#37
  • Mar 10, 2007
  • #37
Route, exactly...
Jadesville, pm me when you get a chance...
 
V

vc351w

New Member
Dec 24, 2005
19
0
0
SoCal
Mar 11, 2007
#38
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #38
Classic Performance For Mustang

Her's a scan of the CPP suspension for the Mustang.
 

Attachments

  • CPPMustangScan.webp
    52 KB · Views: 214
C

C0V3R

Member
Feb 14, 2003
524
0
16
Australia
Mar 11, 2007
#39
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #39
So that massive steel plate is so you can run lower a-arms is it? Not a bad idea, looks very heavy though. Do you have any photos of it installed?
 
O

okibono

New Member
Sep 19, 2006
32
0
0
Mar 11, 2007
#40
  • Mar 11, 2007
  • #40
thats interesting...what is the price?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 11
Next
First Prev 2 of 11 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
98
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
A
P0036 P0056 P0137 P0157 2020 Ford Mustang GT
  • AmkoA
  • Jun 16, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
111
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Jun 16, 2026
AmkoA
A
O
Sooty/Oily Front Engine & Pulleys
  • ozenator
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
285
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2026
Blackhawkxx
I
1994 Cobra - Fuel Pressure Drops Revving at Idle
  • IconicSilverGT500
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
434
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 24, 2026
Mcmahst
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
215
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?