• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Head Experts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter igotyofire
  • Start date Start date Jul 17, 2005
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 17, 2005
#1
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #1
Which aluminum heads other then AFR dont require different valve covers and longer pushrods, in otherwords which heads could u reuse everything?

Also a pair of ported gt40s could expectidly flow around what cfm?
 

YEAHLOH95

Founding Member
Nov 19, 2001
1,249
3
39
EVERETT,PA
Jul 17, 2005
#2
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #2
gt 40 x heads use every stock piece .
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 17, 2005
#3
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #3
igotyofire said:
Which aluminum heads other then AFR dont require different valve covers and longer pushrods, in otherwords which heads could u reuse everything?

Also a pair of ported gt40s could expectidly flow around what cfm?
Click to expand...

I think most of the popular heads out there will do what you want to do.

Know that if you go this route you will always have to use ped mount rockers.

Later
Grady
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 17, 2005
#4
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #4
final5-0 said:
I think most of the popular heads out there will do what you want to do.

Know that if you go this route you will always have to use ped mount rockers.

Later
Grady
Click to expand...

isn't stock studmount? ... how much does it usually cost to mill a set of heads? if anyone knows, just trying to generalize some ideas
 

glenn95gt

Founding Member
Oct 15, 2001
420
0
0
Bay Area, California
Jul 17, 2005
#5
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #5
pedestal mount is stock, if you plan on using stud mount rockers, just find yourself free fox body valve cover and grind out the baffles. this is what I did.
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Jul 17, 2005
#6
  • Jul 17, 2005
  • #6
GT40 Y303 heads will reuse all the stock pieces. FRPP has a policy of selling parts that will fit like factory parts.
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 18, 2005
#7
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #7
glenn95gt said:
pedestal mount is stock, if you plan on using stud mount rockers, just find yourself free fox body valve cover and grind out the baffles. this is what I did.
Click to expand...

studmount is what people recommend right, being alot easier ?
 

GRGT1994

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
1,034
0
0
Jul 18, 2005
#8
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #8
That thread title cracks me up.
 

91LX_5L

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
1,943
0
36
British Columbia
Jul 18, 2005
#9
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #9
GRGT1994 said:
That thread title cracks me up.
Click to expand...
I was thinking the same thing.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 18, 2005
#10
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #10
igotyofire said:
studmount is what people recommend right, being alot easier ?
Click to expand...

The reason I went with stud mount is they are a little stronger, more stable at high rpm, and offer a variable amount of valve adjustment with ease.

They do cost a bit more than ped mount due to needing guide plates and hardned pr's.

They usually will not fit under the stock vc's.

Later
Grady
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Jul 18, 2005
#11
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #11
igotyofire said:
studmount is what people recommend right, being alot easier ?
Click to expand...
stud mount rockers are definitely not easier. they require quite a bit more work to adjust them properly. in fact, even after following all the guides on how to do it, i always had valvetrain noise and tapping after adjusting the stud mount rockers. the procedure is considerably more complicated (to me at least). i can however adjust pedestal mounts in about 10 minutes with my eyes closed.
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 19, 2005
#12
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #12
Green 94 5.0 said:
stud mount rockers are definitely not easier. they require quite a bit more work to adjust them properly. in fact, even after following all the guides on how to do it, i always had valvetrain noise and tapping after adjusting the stud mount rockers. the procedure is considerably more complicated (to me at least). i can however adjust pedestal mounts in about 10 minutes with my eyes closed.
Click to expand...

arent all of the twisted wedge heads stud mount? dont belive ive seen pedastal offered....eh i dunno which style of head i will need..mine is going to be a street application, not making any serious hp over 300 if that ever,my mechanic is very good so adjusting i dont think will be an issue
 
I

igotyofire

Member
Feb 26, 2004
774
1
19
Southern California
Jul 19, 2005
#13
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #13
igotyofire said:
arent all of the twisted wedge heads stud mount? dont belive ive seen pedastal offered....eh i dunno which style of head i will need..mine is going to be a street application, not making any serious hp over 300 if that ever,my mechanic is very good so adjusting i dont think will be an issue
Click to expand...

anyone?
 

95strokerPSU

Member
Jul 29, 2004
986
1
19
Sacramento from Philly
Jul 19, 2005
#14
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #14
igotyofire said:
isn't stock studmount? ... how much does it usually cost to mill a set of heads? if anyone knows, just trying to generalize some ideas
Click to expand...

This is the website for the guy that built my engine. He specializes in head work though and has his prices listed.

CLICK
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 19, 2005
#15
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #15
igotyofire said:
anyone?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure but I think they are stud mount.

You could always go to their site and check it out.

Later
Grady
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Jul 19, 2005
#16
  • Jul 19, 2005
  • #16
ALL TW heads are stud mount.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
N/A build on fresh stock 302
  • djcarrot
  • Oct 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
405
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
AeroCoupe
W
I need a 1997 Mustang PATS A expert!
  • Wolfdogg
  • Oct 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
185
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 5, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
G
4.6L rods and piston into a 5.4L
  • Green mustang
  • Jun 11, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
324
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2025
Green mustang
G
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?