• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

headgasket ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter QWIKSVO
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2003
Q

QWIKSVO

New Member
Nov 16, 2003
69
0
0
St.Louis, Missouri
Dec 9, 2003
#1
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #1
Ok, you 2.3L turbo gurus I have heard the fel-pro head gasket pretty much sucks. What do you all recommend.
 

Mike SVOR

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2000
649
0
16
Dec 9, 2003
#2
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #2
QWIKSVO said:
Ok, you 2.3L turbo gurus I have heard the fel-pro head gasket pretty much sucks. What do you all recommend.
Click to expand...

Fel-Pro Gaskets








Fel-Pro 1035 to be exact.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Dec 9, 2003
#3
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #3
Fel- Pro.
 
S

SpyVO

New Member
Apr 23, 2003
66
0
0
NH/Mass
Dec 9, 2003
#4
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #4
The stock Fel-Pro doesn't suck. IF you have to ask which to use, then you probably will still be OK using the stock replacement, 8993. The 1035 is the performance variant as I understand it, and costs a lot more ($50+ vs. $16).

Guys like MikeSVOR have setups that are more than 'mildly modified', and probably NEED the 1035.
 

Mike SVOR

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2000
649
0
16
Dec 9, 2003
#5
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #5
Yep.

A great gasket is a great gasket.
And the 1035 in my books is a great gasket.

If it holds up to what I put it through, I say it's my first choice.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Dec 9, 2003
#6
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #6
Corteco White
 

Mike SVOR

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2000
649
0
16
Dec 9, 2003
#7
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #7
SpyVO said:
The stock Fel-Pro doesn't suck. IF you have to ask which to use, then you probably will still be OK using the stock replacement, 8993. The 1035 is the performance variant as I understand it, and costs a lot more ($50+ vs. $16).

Guys like MikeSVOR have setups that are more than 'mildly modified', and probably NEED the 1035.
Click to expand...

Actually, I'd like to elaborate on this for a sec.
I used the 8993 felpro gasket for a year then it blew.
When I pulled the gasket off, the material around the water passages were rotted off. It didn't hold up at all.
Not only did it blow, but it disolved!
I will never recommend it to anyone.

Spend the money if you wana do it once.
 
R

rjpetr

New Member
Dec 17, 2002
128
0
0
Tampa FL
Dec 9, 2003
#8
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #8
I used the 8993 without a prob. Spray it with high temp copper paint. Works great and I have never had a prob. I routinely run 6k rpms and 15lbs boost.

 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Dec 9, 2003
#9
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #9
Mike SVOR said:
Actually, I'd like to elaborate on this for a sec.
I used the 8993 felpro gasket for a year then it blew.
When I pulled the gasket off, the material around the water passages were rotted off. It didn't hold up at all.
Not only did it blow, but it disolved!
I will never recommend it to anyone.

Spend the money if you wana do it once.
Click to expand...

That's why I like the Corteco White...it's dirt cheap, is bathed in a silicon polymer and then coated with a thin coat of white silicon (for ease in "reading" it) and then the fire rings are installed. This keeps the HG from eroding away when exposed to water and oil. You can read all about it at www.corteco-usa.com

Stinger
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine 2.3 fox body upgrades from sn95
  • 92ponyboy
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
4
Views
346
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 25, 2026
NXcoupe
N
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
338
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
A
Help ID - Turbo GT, SVO differences
  • aldoelmalo
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
91
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 2, 2026
aldoelmalo
A
Opinions on a possible project car w/ pics
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
10
Views
282
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Mar 30, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
911
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?