Heads vs cams
- Thread starter wht99gtconv
- Start date
I've seen what just adding Stage 2 cams can do. VERY IMPRESSIVE! Kurgan ran consistent 12.80's before them. Yesterday at Bradenton (45*) he ran a 12.24@110! SO that's my vote.
GoBabyVroommm
Active Member
GoBabyVroommm said:
Hmmm, I've yet to see track times with more than 1/2 sec gain with just p/p heads
Well, Bill picked up about 22RWHP. Pretty impressive. He also has a Bullitt intake and longtubes, so he probably saw good gains like that from the support of better flowing intake and exhaust. I believe he's at around 280RWHP right now, and he hasn't had a custom tune for the cams.
I can only imagine what a nice P&P job would do.
I can only imagine what a nice P&P job would do.
stangman
15 Year Member
wht99gtconv said:
well you don't have to have a super aggressive cam. as a matter of fact i don't think bill went with a really aggresive cam, stage 1 or 2 if i remember correct. bill drives his everywhere
BlackVert
15 Year Member
The 99+ heads already breath pretty well. I would recommend cams and LTs. Of course, doing cams means pulling the heads, so you might as well save up and P/P them as well while you have them off ...wht99gtconv said:
stangman
15 Year Member
GinoGT said:Bill went with the Stage 1's by VT.
He also changed them with the heads still on the car, but admits to never do it again that way.
And Stage 1 is all you might be able to get away will if you need to pass the sniffer.I hate environmentalists and those stupid emission laws.
thanks gino
i thought he only went with stage 1, but couldn't remember exactly for sureSimilar threads
