• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Help me build a short block combo

  • Thread starter Thread starter Great68
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2004

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Nov 24, 2004
#1
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #1
Here's the scoop.

I want to start a long term project to build up a stout short block to better compliment my top end and of course make more power reliably. This is a project I would like to build as I slowly acquire parts. I would like to be in the 300 wheel horsepower range N/A (Which I don't think is unreasonable).

My car is 99% street duty, and cruising around town. I found out that in fact I do a lot of highway driving so higher gears are a must (no more than 3.25:1), as well as I need it to not want to stall at stoplights and be able to operate the power steering and power brakes in parking lots.

I would like to reuse as much as the top end parts as I can (Heads, intake, carb, roller rockers). And I would like to keep the fuel supplied with a mechanical fuel pump.

My current set up is:
302 block 289, 0.030" over
Stock crank, rods
Cast 0.030" pistons (Brand unknown)
Afr 165's, 61cc combustion chambers
Comp XE262H Cam
Crane Blazer 1.6 Roller Rockers
Speed Demon 650 Vac Sec Carb
Edelbrock Performer RPM Mechanical Fuel Pump

So what I need your opinion on are the following:

Block:
I would like to go to a roller cam, but don't like the idea of retrofitting a non-roller block. Should a stock roller block do fine (reliably) for my power goals?

Crank:
I would definately like to go to 331 cubes, so a stroker crank is in the cards. I know a lot of people would say that the AFR 165's are small for a 331, and that the 185's are a better choice but I don't care about absolute peak horsepower potential. I think the 165's should still make more power on a 331 than a 289. What brands would be a good choice?

Rods:
Type? Brand?

Pistons:
Type (I don't mind paying for Forged if it's worth it, I wouldn't mind the option of putting a small shot of nitrous on the motor down the line)? Brand?

Bearings:
Brand?

Cam:
Any recommendations?

Stud Girdle?
Helpful or waste of money for me

Of course all fasteners would be ARP.

Am I missing anything?
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Nov 24, 2004
#2
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #2
I would also like to know people's opinions about the block, pistons, rods, induction etc. because I am pretty much in the same boat as you, thinking about putting a stroker in my '66.

I believe the 165's you have would work perfectly fine on a 331. I have read many threads where others have said go with the 185's but since you have the 165's and they flow VERY well in stock form, I don't see how they would be a limiting factor in a moderately built 331.

As of now I am thinking my combo will probably be a 347 or 331 with around 10:1 compression with hyper pistons and I beam rods. If you are serious about N2O in the future then I would shoot for a little less compression and forged pistons. I think a stock roller block will do fine for naturally aspirated applications but may be too weak if a large dose of nitrous (>100) is used.

One very fast and streetable combo that impresses me is washmo66 and his 347 coupe. His 347 with ported 185's, comp roller cam 274,750 demon, with c4 and 3.70 gears runs mid 11's! I will probably try to model his combo a bit except use my top end consisting of Twisted Wedge heads and 650 speed demon.

I also think your rockers, intake, carb, and fuel pump will work very well on a 331. I believe the Comp. XE266 roller cam would go well with this combo as well.
Do you have 1 5/8" headers? Do you have an idea of the compression ratio you would like to have? You do not want to have too much cam and compression with 3.25 gears.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Nov 24, 2004
#3
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #3
1: block, since you want a roller cam i would recomend using an 85-95 block since they are already settup for roller cams.

2: cam the comp cams xe274hr roller cam is a good street cam that will compliment your heads.

3: for the rotating assembly i would recomend saving for a complete kit as that way you get everything at once, including rings and bearings. most kits use federal mogul bearings and rings. by all means have to rotating assembly balanced. and forged pistons, while not neccessary on a street motor, are not a bad idea for what you want.

4: as for your current top end parts, use them all as they are fairly well matched to the combination.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Nov 24, 2004
#4
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #4
Vinyl66 said:
Do you have 1 5/8" headers? Do you have an idea of the compression ratio you would like to have? You do not want to have too much cam and compression with 3.25 gears.
Click to expand...

I have Reproduction Tri-Y's for headers. I wouldn't mind a compression ratio of 9.5-10:1 As long as I can run on pump gas (94 octane is premium up here).
 

67coupe351w

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
424
0
0
Portland, OR
Nov 24, 2004
#5
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #5
Are you against a 351? You can get a roller block 351, already got the extra cubes built in and it will bolt right in as well.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Nov 24, 2004
#6
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #6
67coupe351w said:
Are you against a 351? You can get a roller block 351, already got the extra cubes built in and it will bolt right in as well.
Click to expand...

I'm worried about the hood clearance. AND i'd have to get a new intake.
 
S

se7en-zero

New Member
May 20, 2003
58
0
0
Nov 25, 2004
#7
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #7
If you are serious about N2O in the future then I would shoot for a little less compression and forged pistons. I think a stock roller block will do fine for naturally aspirated applications but may be too weak if a large dose of nitrous (>100) is used.
Click to expand...

Nitrous 'loves' compression...lowering the compression to run nitrous is not only a myth but also a bad option...Compression and nitrous actually get along rather well.

For what it is worth, the stock 5.0 bottom end is good for 450-500hp. I know plenty of people that run 200 shots of nitrous on bone stock bottom ends. I also know plenty of people that put 7-12 pounds of boost to a stock bottom end.


Go 'forged' if you have the money, it really wont be needed for a mild street motor.

I would def. get a main girdle and bolt the whole motor together with ARP stuff...
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
Nov 25, 2004
#8
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #8
se7en-zero said:
Nitrous 'loves' compression...lowering the compression to run nitrous is not only a myth but also a bad option...Compression and nitrous actually get along rather well.

For what it is worth, the stock 5.0 bottom end is good for 450-500hp. I know plenty of people that run 200 shots of nitrous on bone stock bottom ends. I also know plenty of people that put 7-12 pounds of boost to a stock bottom end.


Go 'forged' if you have the money, it really wont be needed for a mild street motor.

I would def. get a main girdle and bolt the whole motor together with ARP stuff...
Click to expand...

True, you can run nitrous on a high compression engine (even a 13:1 compression race engine) but you must be much more careful with the nitrous/ fuel ratio and must have PLENTY of octane to go with it as well. One reason is that N20 cools so well. The cylinder pressures still go up using nitrous which is why I would rather have a little cushion on my street engine with starting with a 9.5 or so ratio as compared to a 10.5 compression.

I think the stock roller block is good too, but if a stroker is making about 400hp (not too difficult) and you add a 100 shot of N20 then you would be pushing it.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Nov 25, 2004
#9
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #9
The words 300HP and Nitrous should not be used in the same sentence.
 
6

'69Stang

Founding Member
Sep 28, 1999
1,130
2
38
Metro Detroit
Nov 25, 2004
#10
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #10
I think you have all the parts for a really nice combo. To gain additional power I would get the AFR 165's ported to match the additional cubes. I agree with others who say that these will match up very well with 331 cubes and a little more proting will make them work that much better. A good compression ratio might be around 10.5:1 since you will be able to run premium pump gas, develop good power, and avoid detonation. A roller cam would be a great thing. Personally, the solid rollers are unbeatable. A good compromise is the Comp Cams 282S solid lifter cam which gives 236/236 duration at .050 and is considerably cheaper than a roller. The Performer RPM is a very good intake and a good choice with your gear. Good luck, it should work out well.
 
F

fastback brian

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2002
540
0
0
So Cal , I.E.
Nov 25, 2004
#11
  • Nov 25, 2004
  • #11
I would go with a atleast a dart sportsman block and forged scat crank and rods. SRP pistons will work great for just about anything but the big power adders. Your compression ratio will and should depend on heads and cam choice. But you may end up with around 10-11 to 1 for a street setup. My personal opinion is to go with a 3.4 stroke for the extra power and torque. And a custom solid lifter flat cam will work just fine.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Nov 26, 2004
#12
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #12
fastback brian said:
I would go with a atleast a dart sportsman block and forged scat crank and rods.
Click to expand...

That would probably be a bit over kill would it not? I mean sure I have a big strength potential, but I can't imagine I'd make enough power to need to have that much strength. I think it would also be out of my price range.

I would also like to stay with a hydraulic cam, I don't like the thought of adjusting the lash every so often. (I'm lazy hahaha )
 
F

Fostang

Founding Member
May 8, 2002
1,400
0
36
Stockton, Ca
Nov 26, 2004
#13
  • Nov 26, 2004
  • #13
What you have is fine to get you 300 rwhp no problem.... no reason to upgrade and waste more money.

Maybe a custom cam.

With proper tune that combo will do what you want out of it.

I am a firm believer that the build is as equally important if not more than the parts that go into. The cam should be installed perfectly no eye balling the dots. Using proper tools and measuring out clearences insures the motor will last a real long time and spin how it should.

I have made 500 rwhp out of a stock block 306 no nitrous. It is possible to squeeze a lot of these little motors.


Then you have fastback brian suggesting a 2k block and using a 600 cheap forged crank. WHY? Thats when Billet stuff comes into play. Take advantage of the 2K hp capabality.

Also don't wast your money on forged or H beam stuff on a stock 302 block. Just forged pistons.

Forged pistons are a must for power adders. gives you a little more room to play with. Also the top ring gap should be bigger.

11's are a common thing with a 331 and 347 with traction.

Just so you know a stock bottom end will take 200 shot no problem. I'm talking 5.0 roller with trw pistons standard on 87-92 mustangs and some lincolns.

This is comming from a person that has tried out this crap no bench racing here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
237
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
985
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
759
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
240
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
772
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?