• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Help me choose a daily driver..choices inside

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Boogeyman
  • Start date Start date Jun 12, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Skidawg

Member
Nov 11, 2003
104
0
16
Jun 15, 2008
#21
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #21
When I was picking up the current DD, I was looking for something a bit "sporty" and fuel efficeint. I had it down to Subaru (not model specific), Toyota Celica, another Probe, and a Honda Prelude. I picked up a Prelude for a good price. I couldn't be happier. Great car and fun to drive.

You can't go wrong with a well taken care of Honda, but it's a tough find these days. Everyone is gunning for the small, reliable, and efficeint cars right now...
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Jun 15, 2008
#22
  • Jun 15, 2008
  • #22
how about a 1992-2001 Lexus ES300 the ones in the 95-00 range can be very reasonable....plus they get good gas mileage and they are really nice.

plus its a toyota...so it will last a long time.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Jun 16, 2008
#23
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #23
Yeah I actually really like the later model Preludes.

With the V-tec motor they are actually pretty quick, 14.7-14.9 1/4 mile rings a bell.
 

eliteJAE

Member
May 29, 2007
0
1
16
Stanford University
Jun 16, 2008
#24
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #24
stay away from V dubs man, in the long run they get expensive.

i dunno what year they started or if they're in ur price range, but check out Chevy cobalts, theyre pretty decent and really fuel efficient.

other than that, stick with 90's hondas. you see em all the time, that's a good sign of longevity. My friends got a 90 something accord, and its cheap and easy to fix, not to mention he drives around on empty for miles and miles and its no biggie LOL
 

Jacob_Royer

Member
Nov 24, 2007
142
1
19
Jun 16, 2008
#25
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #25
By a honda! make sure it hasnt been riced out by some asshat and youl be good.. I've owned several honda's and NEVER got stranded or had any problems other than brakes and tires..

82 accord 575k miles! fell asleep and rear-ended a dump truck. Bent the sh@# out of the front end and it ate tires after that so i sold it.. Guy bought it dropped the motor in another honda and put about 100k more on the motor before it crapped out on him.

84 Prelude 450k dual 3bbl sidedrafts very fun car! I knew the previous owner and not only did he not maintain it but he ran the absolute pizz out of it! I drove it for 2 years and 60k and did the same thing! i red-lined it in every gear almost everytime i drove it! knocked down a flat 10 in the 1/8th mile with it too! not shabby for what it was! finaly sold it because the front main literraly wore a grove in the crankshaft and made it leak oil badly!

89 Prelude SI 220k Loved the car wicked handling (same with the 84) got rear-ended by a f350 smashed the trunk in like an acordian! he was going about 50 i was sitting still!! The carwas still drivable but looked like azz! sold it to a co-worker who got drunk and later smashed it into a telephone pole!

92 Honda accord 310k Bought this thing and drove it forever! never had a single problem with it! only reason i sold it was It was ugly and i wanted somthing newer! guy that bought it from me i work with and its almost hit 400k! still no problems!

98 Acura (*** built honda) Integra 220k nice car but the insurance was rediculous on it for some reason! sold it and bought the GT and literaly saved so much on insurance it MAKEs the gt payment! not a bad car had a 1.8 pretty spunky 30mpg or so handled nice but it was an auto and i hate autos plus payinh $150 a month to insure a 4cyl car was stupid! I pay less than that to have full coerage on my GT my z-71 my T-bird and my 30' camper now!

Honda's are top of the line *** built cars and will run forever with regular maintnence..
 
I

importrx7

New Member
Jul 30, 2006
44
0
0
Jun 16, 2008
#26
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #26
Jacob_Royer said:
98 Acura (*** built honda) Integra 220k nice car but the insurance was rediculous on it for some reason! sold it and bought the GT and literaly saved so much on insurance it MAKEs the gt payment! not a bad car had a 1.8 pretty spunky 30mpg or so handled nice but it was an auto and i hate autos plus payinh $150 a month to insure a 4cyl car was stupid! I pay less than that to have full coerage on my GT my z-71 my T-bird and my 30' camper now!

Honda's are top of the line *** built cars and will run forever with regular maintnence..
Click to expand...

I agree integra's are always on the top of the most stolen car is why the insurance is high i imagine, but buy a honda good cars for daily driving not racing lol
 

Mr Boogeyman

New Member
Apr 22, 2008
51
0
0
Northern California
Jun 16, 2008
#27
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #27
I forgot about Acura's ... I might have to look into that...I want something with at least 25mpg and looks kind of sporty so it will probably be a Honda. Thanks
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Jun 16, 2008
#28
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #28
Out of your list I would say the Eclipse. The turbo models are decently fast and you can make them clean looking without the "rice" factor. I have WAY more respect for Mitsubishi than I do Honda or Acura.
 

Jacob_Royer

Member
Nov 24, 2007
142
1
19
Jun 16, 2008
#29
  • Jun 16, 2008
  • #29
Mitsubishi=Unreliable junk

Fast yes

Reliable/durrable no
 
F

Fastwrx15

Banned
May 11, 2008
42
0
0
Woodstock,Illinois
Jun 17, 2008
#30
  • Jun 17, 2008
  • #30
Jacob_Royer said:
Mitsubishi=Unreliable junk
Click to expand...
+1 Having worked at a Mitsubishi dealership for years I
can tell you that is the truth.Subaru also has better resale value than Mitsubishi.
I now have been a Master Subaru technician for many years
and I can honestly say.
Subaru=reliability/dependability and one of the best automakers on the market.
 

Jacob_Royer

Member
Nov 24, 2007
142
1
19
Jun 17, 2008
#31
  • Jun 17, 2008
  • #31
used to have a subaru with a 1.8 turbo.. With the turbo turned up and bad oil pressure i ran it to 250k before it started knocking! not bad at all......
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

2004 Mach 1 crank but no start. dying inside
  • gavinmgrant
  • May 23, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
50
Views
10K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 11, 2022
Mach1.0
M
Planned Cross Country Run - 65 Fastback
  • Smokinstang65
  • Aug 17, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
4K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2022
Baron von K 289
B
Daily Driver Decisions....Need Honest Help
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Mar 5, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
58
Views
11K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2020
BlakeusMaximus
T
Fox No Boost And Stumped
  • TWEECD
  • Aug 12, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
63
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 31, 2017
TWEECD
T
New (old) Car As A Daily Driver
  • Bobby77
  • Aug 11, 2013
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2013
bhuff30
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?