• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

help me pick a supercharger

  • Thread starter Thread starter romgolferman
  • Start date Start date Oct 6, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Oct 8, 2005
#41
  • Oct 8, 2005
  • #41
1fast03pony said:
wouldnt be doin for the looks
Click to expand...


I'm doin' it because KB is one of the best, maybe even the best blower on the market for a street mustang that wants that "Big Block" low end torque and power. The KB design (that lets you throw the OEM plastic intake in the dumpster) is just a bonus.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 9, 2005
#42
  • Oct 9, 2005
  • #42
BuffaloZone said:
The KB design (that lets you throw the OEM plastic intake in the dumpster) is just a bonus.
Click to expand...
You're not giving the OEM intake much credit. Yeah it may not be as pretty as the KB unit (not that you ever see their lower anyway), but it will still support over 600rwhp. Which is nearly 100-more than I've ever seen any 1.7L KB produce? And now that they've got the aluminum cross over built in, they're as reliable as an OEM piece should be.
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Oct 10, 2005
#43
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #43
Gearbanger 101 said:
You're not giving the OEM intake much credit.
Click to expand...

How many people have made nasty postings about the "POS intake" (etc...) in the past? I wonder?

Yeah it may not be as pretty as the KB unit (not that you ever see their lower anyway)
Click to expand...

That's the whole point, duh - add a world-class SC and clean up the OEM mess at the same time. It's a win-win.


but it will still support over 600rwhp.
Click to expand...

Never said it wouldn't.


Which is nearly 100-more than I've ever seen any 1.7L KB produce?
Click to expand...

You're pretending that the 1.7 is the only KB blower that you can buy for the Mustang? Or are you pretending that other bigger KB blowers still use the OEM plastic intake when you install the blower?


And now that they've got the aluminum cross over built in, they're as reliable as an OEM piece should be.
Click to expand...

Kenne Bell decided to shy away from using a plastic manifold. I like that.
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
New york
Oct 10, 2005
#44
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #44
BuffaloZone said:
I'm doin' it because KB is one of the best, maybe even the best blower on the market for a street mustang that wants that "Big Block" low end torque and power.
Click to expand...


agreed, but its the best at what it does

every blower is different for different applications

i like the mid-high end pull, without the engine falling flat. Centri's are widely known for this mid-high end pull

BuffaloZone said:
The KB design (that lets you throw the OEM plastic intake in the dumpster) is just a bonus.
Click to expand...

so trash the stock intake and buy a RR intake or P-51 with the centri. its only a grand or so more, and by then youll still be under the price of the KB

and looks should really be the last concern unless youre entering your car in shows-- given, yeah you dotn want it to look like ****. In my opinion, centris look good even with the stocker intake.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 10, 2005
#45
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #45
BuffaloZone said:
How many people have made nasty postings about the "POS intake" (etc...) in the past? I wonder?
Click to expand...
.....I know there's a point in there somewhere in reference to my statement of you not giving the OEM intake much credit.....but I'm sorry I've failed to find it?
BuffaloZone said:
That's the whole point, duh - add a world-class SC and clean up the OEM mess at the same time. It's a win-win.
Click to expand...
You're under the impression that we all don't like the look of the stock intake? Plenty of "world class" S/C's on the market the do it just as well, for less than the KB and still retain the factory parts. You could always paint the stock lower intake silver if it made you feel any better.
BuffaloZone said:
You're pretending that the 1.7 is the only KB blower that you can buy for the Mustang? Or are you pretending that other bigger KB blowers still use the OEM plastic intake when you install the blower?
Click to expand...
I'm not pretending anything? The blowers you were just drooling over were 1.7's, so that's the example I used. Sure, you can go with the 2.2L kit if you'd like, but for a guy wanting in the 350-500rwhp range, the 2.2L is a lot of overkill. Oh...and don't forget the $10,000.00 you're going to have into it before all is said and done. For that price you could run any of the popular centies, with an aftermarket aluminum manifold if that's all you care about seeing with a blower package and still come out thousands less in price.
BuffaloZone said:
Kenne Bell decided to shy away from using a plastic manifold. I like that.
Click to expand...
Before this gets any further, lets get one thing strait. Kenne Bell didn't decide to replace the plastic manifold because it was inferior. Kenne Bell had no choice but to design their own manifold because for one, their kit wouldn't work with the OEM and for another they needed to use the aluminum manifold because their big 40lb twin crew would obliterate any plastic manifold they designed with the constant strain, stress and torqueing of it being under load all of the time. It wasn't a quality issue that made them go with the aluminum unit, it was a durability issue because a positive displacement blower mounted on top of anything else would be a disaster waiting to happen. Trust me, if Kenne Bell could have gotten away with running a less prone to heat soak, smoother composite lower over a rough cast aluminum one, they would have! Name one company that builds a plastic lower for any positive displacement blower and I'll eat my hat!

A Centrifugal supercharger doesn't place any stress at all on the lower intake manifold other than pressurization of the runners....and they've been shown to stand up just fine to that. So why would Centi designers add to the price of their kit by building another manifold, made of a heavier, more prone to heat soak aluminum casting when the stock unit flows more than enough air for all but the most serious of engines and saves them thousands and thousands in manufacturing fee's (not to mention the additional cost they would need to tack on to their product) at the same time? There are plenty of aftermarket manifolds out there to choose from that flow far more air than Kenne Bells piece, so if someone wanted to go that route, the option is always open. But the nicest part about that is, that’ it’s always an option. A centi owner isn’t forced to buy an unnecessary manifold that they don’t need, if they don’t want it….keeping the cost low and smile on their face!
 
H

Herz21

New Member
Aug 31, 2005
10
0
0
Richmond, IN
Oct 10, 2005
#46
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #46
1fast03pony said:



how do you like the vortech? Im leaning toward a centri
Click to expand...


I vote vortec. I have had good results with mine so far.
 

xseler8

Member
May 4, 2004
619
0
17
Montgomery County,Pa.
Oct 10, 2005
#47
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #47
another suggestion in selecting a supercharger is find a quality performance shop (with a dyno)and see what they like to install and work with. You may need the shop for maintainance or service in the future.Every shop that I spoke to when I was looking for a S/C had something different to offer. One sold Magnum's the other liked Vortec and the 3rd(that I ended up using) favored intercooled Prochargers. I wanted the KB but ended up with the ATI.(& I like it) I say again..be selective about your installer/tuner. You live or die here.You will enjoy any S/C. Also get a boost gauge & use a shift light to protect your engine.I shift as soon as the red light takes my picture..5500rpm
 

dkshadow

Banned
May 12, 2003
952
0
0
TEXAS
Oct 10, 2005
#48
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #48
Paxton
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Oct 10, 2005
#49
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #49
I vote Vortech YSi trim. Good for up to 30PSI and 1200HP . It will lay waste to a Kenne Bell. With gears you won't notice much difference down low compared to KB. Just my .02.
 
O

oohsoobad2

Banned
Dec 17, 2004
127
0
0
Oct 10, 2005
#50
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #50
coolblueperformance sells a S Trim tuner kit for $2500. I believe their Novi 2000 tuner kit is $3000, thats the best Centi blower deals I have found. The 2.2 KB is a great option for a street GT but you can do a twin turbo setup for nearly as much money.
 
2

2001sleeper

New Member
Nov 22, 2004
136
0
0
Oct 10, 2005
#51
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #51
i am happy with my t-trim, the KB 2.2 is awesome, but it was way out of my price range. it all depends on what your goals and what best suits an individual. KB is not the best for everything blower.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Oct 10, 2005
#52
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #52
2001sleeper said:
i am happy with my t-trim, the KB 2.2 is awesome, but it was way out of my price range. it all depends on what your goals and what best suits an individual. KB is not the best for everything blower.
Click to expand...

Have you had yours on the dyno yet? If so what kind of numbers are you putting down? Just curious. I like centri's over twin screws.
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Oct 10, 2005
#53
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #53
Gearbanger 101 said:
.....I know there's a point in there somewhere in reference to my statement of you not giving the OEM intake much credit.....but I'm sorry I've failed to find it?
Click to expand...

Because a whole lot of people don't like the "POS"?


You're under the impression that we all don't like the look of the stock intake?
Click to expand...

No, not at all. Just the ones that make postings about how much they hate it.


Plenty of "world class" S/C's on the market the do it just as well, for less than the KB and still retain the factory parts.
Click to expand...

There it is...your main gripe about KB seems to always be the price.


You could always paint the stock lower intake silver if it made you feel any better.
Click to expand...

Why? The ugly thing would just be even more visible.


I'm not pretending anything?
Click to expand...

You mean you don't even know if you are?


The blowers you were just drooling over were 1.7's, so that's the example I used.
Click to expand...

[Evasion Noted] You tried to compare a less boost lower HP KB to a higher boost higher HP centri...


Sure, you can go with the 2.2L kit if you'd like
Click to expand...

So I could get into the "600rwhp" that you decided to bring up?


but for a guy wanting in the 350-500rwhp range, the 2.2L is a lot of overkill.
Click to expand...

[Evasion Noted] ...then why did you start talking about "600rwhp"?


Oh...and don't forget the $10,000.00 you're going to have into it before all is said and done. For that price you could run any of the popular centies, with an aftermarket aluminum manifold if that's all you care about seeing with a blower package and still come out thousands less in price.
Click to expand...

If I wanted it, I wouldn't let the price destroy me...like it seems to do to you.



Before this gets any further, lets get one thing strait.
Click to expand...

What? Because you found a new way to spell "straight"? Hope you're not making mistakes just because you're getting too upset.


Kenne Bell didn't decide to replace the plastic manifold because it was inferior. Kenne Bell had no choice but to design their own manifold because for one, their kit wouldn't work with the OEM and for another they needed to use the aluminum manifold because their big 40lb twin crew would obliterate any plastic manifold they designed with the constant strain, stress and torqueing of it being under load all of the time. It wasn't a quality issue that made them go with the aluminum unit, it was a durability issue because a positive displacement blower mounted on top of anything else would be a disaster waiting to happen. Trust me, if Kenne Bell could have gotten away with running a less prone to heat soak, smoother composite lower over a rough cast aluminum one, they would have! Name one company that builds a plastic lower for any positive displacement blower and I'll eat my hat!
Click to expand...

Thanks for weeping and going into so much detail about why so many companies don't use plastic. I'm proud of each and every one of them.


A Centrifugal supercharger...<snip>
Click to expand...


Like I said, I wouldn't put a "centri" on a pre-2005 motor...that's why I picked Kenne Bell.


BTW...do you even OWN a SC...of any kind?
 

BuffaloZone

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
411
0
0
Oct 11, 2005
#54
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #54
1fast03pony said:
agreed, but its the best at what it does

every blower is different for different applications

i like the mid-high end pull, without the engine falling flat. Centri's are widely known for this mid-high end pull
Click to expand...

After driving my low horsepower N/A car for 35,000 miles I don't think I'll being worrying about too many flat spots from my 9psi (actually 10psi) IC KB...


so trash the stock intake
Click to expand...

I did. Made my week.


and buy a RR intake or P-51 with the centri. its only a grand or so more, and by then youll still be under the price of the KB
Click to expand...

Here's the deal...I don't want to come in under the KB price. Funny how so many car manufacturers shy away from installing the cheaper centrifugal superchargers on their cars. Perhaps they want to steer clear from the cluttered after-market after-thought look?


and looks should really be the last concern unless youre entering your car in shows-- given, yeah you dotn want it to look like ****. In my opinion, centris look good even with the stocker intake.
Click to expand...

I can almost go for the "looks don't matter" plan, but then again, probably the same people that say stuff like that are probably the same people that added pretty wheels to their mustang...and a whole lot of other zero-horsepower parts.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 11, 2005
#55
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #55
Why do you feel the need to quote every single sentence a person writes down, then dance around the subject while trying to make it look as though you've made a point and to then finally pick on someone’s spelling when you're point has been beaten? Maybe you should go back and take a look at a few of your own spelling and grammatical errors before criticizing others? If you can't come up with an original though, that's alright, but there's no need to get desperate. Better be nice, or I'll sick tomustang on you!

That being said, the more and more I read the double talk, member bashing and pointless replies that spews from your finger tips, the more and more it makes me wonder if....

BuffaloZone
= EddieHasskell
......?
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Oct 11, 2005
#56
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #56
Why do all threads topics involving blowers always end up becoming pissing matches? My advice for any newcomer who wants info or opinion on superchargers is to ask elsewhere.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 11, 2005
#57
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #57
02LaserRed2V said:
Why do all threads topics involving blowers always end up becoming pissing matches?
Click to expand...
Not enough open minds on this board, that's the problem. The usual consensus is, if it isn't what they, or their pals are running, it must be crap! The funny thing is, is that I’m not running a Twin Screw, or any type of Centrifugal but I’d have no problem recommending either type, if the situation best suits it.
 
O

oohsoobad2

Banned
Dec 17, 2004
127
0
0
Oct 11, 2005
#58
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #58
Geez, arguing every single sentence someone posts on the internet ?? Dont you have anything better to do?? You people need to get a life, go out and drive or do sumthin...
 

White Stang

Member
Feb 11, 2004
467
0
16
Ft Lauderdale
Oct 11, 2005
#59
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #59
BuffaloZone you are this guy
 

1fast03pony

Member
Jul 1, 2003
749
0
17
New york
Oct 11, 2005
#60
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #60
BuffaloZone said:
After driving my low horsepower N/A car for 35,000 miles I don't think I'll being worrying about too many flat spots from my 9psi (actually 10psi) IC KB.../
Click to expand...

For that price, I wouldnt compromise anything.

BuffaloZone said:
Here's the deal...I don't want to come in under the KB price. Funny how so many car manufacturers shy away from installing the cheaper centrifugal superchargers on their cars. Perhaps they want to steer clear from the cluttered after-market after-thought look?
Click to expand...

Again, youre paying over 5500 for looks.
That sucks.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
ECU/PCM ISSUE
  • Santi1015
  • Jun 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
100
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2026
Santi1015
S
A
Procharger install/prep questions
  • ahratrew
  • Nov 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
367
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 26, 2025
Noobz347
Y
Speed density 302 to carb 351W
  • yaboity
  • May 29, 2026
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
1
Views
86
Fox Engine Swaparoo May 29, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
S302 Saleen supercharger help
  • sschoup
  • Nov 19, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
2
Views
315
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 19, 2025
sschoup
S
F
86 notch NEED HELP!!!!
  • foxbody86
  • Jul 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
74
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?