• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help me pick an intake......

  • Thread starter Thread starter SYLENTBUTVYLENT
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

SYLENTBUTVYLENT

Member
Apr 5, 2003
136
0
17
Chicago
Dec 7, 2004
#1
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #1
I presently have a full weight 92 LX. 302, TrickFlow Twisted Wedge heads, X303 cam, 30 lb injectors, 80mm pro M, 70mm throttle Body. The car has a lentech auto w/3200 stall and 4.30 gears. I currently have a GT-40 intake and I feel like its a bottle neck. Anyone have any suggestions on a more suitable intake?
 

stang95silv

Member
Oct 8, 2003
93
0
6
Dec 7, 2004
#2
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #2
TFS Track Heat
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Dec 7, 2004
#3
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #3
stang95silv said:
TFS Track Heat
Click to expand...


 
M

manpowermustang

Member
Sep 25, 2004
228
0
16
Milwaukee, Wi
Dec 7, 2004
#4
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #4
TFS Track Heat also.
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
Dec 7, 2004
#5
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #5
victor 5.0
 
8

89 droptop

New Member
Mar 7, 2004
86
0
0
Centrial California
Dec 8, 2004
#6
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #6
about that track heat, I was looking in my summit in the Engines and Components section and I noticed the TFS top end kit. It had the TFS heads, cam and intake. Both were the same except for the intake manifold.
STREET HEAT: 350 HP @ about 5,300 rpm, 370 tq @ about 4500rpm
TRACK HEAT: 360 HP @ about 5,800 RPM, 350 tq A about 4500 rpm

Wouldn't 20 lb make up for a loss of 10hp at a higher rpm? and wouldn't that make the Street heat better. The graph is on pg 141 of the Sep-Oct 2004 issue. I mean I could be not seeing an added benifit to the Track heat, it just cought my attention.
 
S

SlowGT

Founding Member
Jun 17, 1999
826
0
0
Columbia Co, PA
Dec 8, 2004
#7
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #7
89 droptop said:
about that track heat, I was looking in my summit in the Engines and Components section and I noticed the TFS top end kit. It had the TFS heads, cam and intake. Both were the same except for the intake manifold.
STREET HEAT: 350 HP @ about 5,300 rpm, 370 tq @ about 4500rpm
TRACK HEAT: 360 HP @ about 5,800 RPM, 350 tq A about 4500 rpm

Wouldn't 20 lb make up for a loss of 10hp at a higher rpm? and wouldn't that make the Street heat better. The graph is on pg 141 of the Sep-Oct 2004 issue. I mean I could be not seeing an added benifit to the Track heat, it just cought my attention.
Click to expand...


I usually toss the summit catalog from the mailbox to the trash, so I don't have the graphs to look at. Peak numbers aren't a very efficient way to compare the intakes. You need to look at the area under the curves and compare where the curves are at different RPM's. A car running 4.30's isn't going to want the curve to be the same as a car running 3.55s/3.73s.
 
8

89 droptop

New Member
Mar 7, 2004
86
0
0
Centrial California
Dec 8, 2004
#8
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #8
Very good point. That is why I wanted someone to look at the graphs, because it SEEMS that the HP curves are pretty similar, with the TRACK heat peak pushed slighly further back then the Street. The torque curve is higher sooner on the STREET heat as well. It would seem that possibly the track heat would be slightly, and I mean slighly, better if you hung on to a higher RPM each gear. But if the Street heat was in fact better at slightly lower RPM wouldn't it be better to not max out your engine so much, prolonging the life, and possibly alowing you to run higher gears for better fuel economy.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Dec 8, 2004
#9
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #9
well the real question is, what do you do with ur car? Daily driver or track car?
 
A

Aeroguy315

New Member
Mar 23, 2003
109
0
0
Phoenix
Dec 8, 2004
#10
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #10
SlowGT said:
I usually toss the summit catalog from the mailbox to the trash, so I don't have the graphs to look at. Peak numbers aren't a very efficient way to compare the intakes. You need to look at the area under the curves and compare where the curves are at different RPM's. A car running 4.30's isn't going to want the curve to be the same as a car running 3.55s/3.73s.
Click to expand...
why do you through the mag in the trash???
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Dec 8, 2004
#11
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #11
Aeroguy315 said:
why do you through the mag in the trash???
Click to expand...

Prolly becasue i sell him stuff at 10-20% less than summit at my parts store

RPM or RPM 2 intake.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 8, 2004
#12
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #12
It's not as straightforward as some would think - picking an intake with a larger cross section. Here is a real world example. I ported an Explorer lower for a customer with AFR 165 heads, E cam, 70mm TB, 75mm Pro-M MAF, etc (see dyno). He thought the Explorer intake was a bottle neck too. Bought an RPMII and lost torque and power up to 5,300 rpm and they then ran side by side through 6,000 rpm. He pulled the RPMII, sold it and put the Explorer back on.
 
S

SYLENTBUTVYLENT

Member
Apr 5, 2003
136
0
17
Chicago
Dec 8, 2004
#13
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #13
The car Is just driven in the summer. Sees track use all summer long. I live within 15 minutes of route 66 dragway in Joliet, Illinois, so just there and back. The car is by no means a daily driver.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 8, 2004
#14
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #14
Not a daily driver? Performer RPM or II...
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 8, 2004
#15
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #15
I dont know much about the X cam and its characteristics, but i would say to get a Holley...especially with those 4.30 gears
 
S

SYLENTBUTVYLENT

Member
Apr 5, 2003
136
0
17
Chicago
Dec 8, 2004
#16
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #16
So obviosly its between,
Trick Flow Street
Trick Flow Track
Performer RPM
Performer RPM 2
Holley Sytemax
I still need a little help narrowing them down. I guess the GT-40 isnt the greatest intake for my combo huh?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 8, 2004
#17
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #17
I'd rethink the cam with that aod combo. Might want to get in touch with jay allen www.camshaftinnovations.com for a cam. I'd use a track heat with a 75mm tb if your still on the stock tiny tb. The right cam/intake package will be the difference between 12.80's and 11.90's.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Dec 8, 2004
#18
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #18
SYLENTBUTVYLENT said:
So obviosly its between,
Trick Flow Street
Trick Flow Track
Performer RPM
Performer RPM 2
Holley Sytemax
I still need a little help narrowing them down. I guess the GT-40 isnt the greatest intake for my combo huh?
Click to expand...


I would look at the TFS Track heat, Performer RPM of RPM 2 and the Systemax. The systemax because you have the really nice gear that will take up the slack from down low that the holley gives up...but the Holley is proven over and over to make up for it and make more power than all of those intakes.

But remember, it only makes more power with the right cam setup.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Dec 8, 2004
#19
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #19
SYLENTBUTVYLENT said:
I still need a little help narrowing them down. I guess the GT-40 isnt the greatest intake for my combo huh?
Click to expand...

Let's see some real world comparisons of intake swaps on the same car along with combo information. What Sylent needs is real world experience vs opinion. Bump.......
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Dec 8, 2004
#20
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #20
Grn92LX said:
I'd rethink the cam with that aod combo. Might want to get in touch with jay allen www.camshaftinnovations.com for a cam. I'd use a track heat with a 75mm tb if your still on the stock tiny tb. The right cam/intake package will be the difference between 12.80's and 11.90's.
Click to expand...

Yep...or contact Ed Curtis @ www.flowtechinduction.com for a cam...

I would keep your 70mm TB instead of swapping...that money can be spent elsewhere...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
599
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Engine Cam idle and timing questions - big cam, little knowledge
  • Justin87
  • Jul 6, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2021
Middleagecrisis
M
B
Help me price my car to sell
  • Bkernan24
  • Oct 13, 2020
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Oct 15, 2020
Bkernan24
B
Engine Backfiring and Shaking Pony
  • Krazykyle44
  • Mar 15, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 17, 2021
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?