• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help with choosing flywheel

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1990LXDropTop
  • Start date Start date Aug 24, 2005
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Aug 24, 2005
#1
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #1
I just ordered a TKO-500 w/26-spline input shaft. I'm also going to be running a Spec stg 2 clutch, so I want to get a new flywheel rather than just re-surfacing the stocker. My question is, which flywheel should I get? Which brand? Steel or aluminum? 28oz or 50oz balance??? What is the best place to buy one? Please help, thanks.
 
S

ScatStroker

Founding Member
Sep 17, 2002
110
0
0
Seattle / Santa Barbara
Aug 24, 2005
#2
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #2
There aren't a lot of choices, many of the flywheels are rebadged anyway so you're getting the same product.

Spec's flywheel are made by Fidanza. FMS's are rebadged and the only other major manufacture is Mcloed and RAM (if memory serves.) They're all good units. Personally, I prefer Fidanza's for their removable weight and rebuildable center sections.

Aluminum = lighter weight, faster acceleration, but it will "feel" a little different. Steel is exactly the same as waht you have now, except probably SFI certified.

Your stock engine is 50oz, unless you have changed it you want to use a 50oz flywheel. This is VERY important.

Brian
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 24, 2005
#3
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #3
Go aluminum hands down. I think you have a stock rotating assembly, so you need 50oz.

Quicker acceleration/rev's and less weight the crank has to turn so thats less wear/tear on the engine. The choice is pretty obvious.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 24, 2005
#4
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #4
Instead of listing just the pros on an aluminum flywheel lets list some cons as well, shall we?

I would get the billet steel flywheel by the way

The aluminum flywheel will help you decelerate quicker and accelerate a tick quicker if you want that little extra addition but some things to think about with the AFW is starting from a stop, particularly on hills, may require more slipping of the clutch to make up for the lower momentum than is stored in the heavier stock flywheel. Some jerking can be occured due to the loss of momentum possibly in between shifts for example as the rpm will drop sooner.

I would stay away from an aluminum flywheel on a daily driver and plus some of the harder grabbing clutches can tear up the aluminum flywheels...and aren't recommended with a aluminum flywheel.

Get a stock replacement or a nice billet steel one...(more expensive)...

This is posted from FastDriver - The answer to your question is that a 15 lbs weight would be easier to catch/stop if it has been thrown at you at the same speed as a 40 lb weight. A pretty obvious answer, but I think you are misinterpretting the results. A drag racing launch has nothing to do with ease of launch. If it did, you wouldn't launch at 6500 rpm, you'd launch right off of idle. Also, my clutch doesn't seem to have any problems grabbing my flywheel at any rpm. My tranny doesn't seem to have any problem managing the shock, and with the right tires and suspension, I will launch this car right off of redline with a single clutch drop.

The point is that you want as much stored energy to jump into your tires as possible, and you want your suspension/weight distribution/ tire combination set up so that it can handle all of the power and effectively put it to the ground - as opposed to wasting it by blowing away the tires.

In regard to your posit about stored energy being meaningless, I'll counter that stored evergy has everything to do with the difference between a heavy flywheel and a light one. In fact, stored energy is the only cause of a performance difference between an aluminum and iron flywheel.

The aluminum flywheel does not store as much energy as rpms increase which gives it an advantage in that the energy that would be stored in the flywheel has instead been exerted into the rotational force in the drivetrain and hence the driving force/power of your car.

In drag racing, that extra stored energy in the flywheel at a stop is put into your tires as soon as the clutch is dropped causing more force/power driving your car as it leaves the line. As your car moves down the track and rpms increase, the energy is transferred back and forth from the flywheel to the tires as rpms increase and then decrease (as you shift). Finally, when you cross the traps, rpms at the top of their powerband, the stored energy in the flywheel did not get put to good use. So, the advantage after you leave the line is to the lighter aluminum flywheel. Does it make up for the Iron one? Possibly. The longer the track, the more likely. However, will the difference be significant enough to justify the extra expenditure? Not to me.

Good Luck with your choice
 
1

1990LXDropTop

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
430
0
0
Western Massachusetts
Aug 24, 2005
#5
  • Aug 24, 2005
  • #5
Thanks guys. I think I'll be going with a Spec bullit steel 50oz flywheel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
187
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
364
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
97
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
991
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
688
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?