• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zignas X
  • Start date Start date Sep 8, 2008

Zignas X

Member
Mar 12, 2008
39
0
6
CA
Sep 8, 2008
#1
  • Sep 8, 2008
  • #1
i want to get some long tube headers and an offroad x pipe but someboy told me that it would actually take power away from my car i have the upper n lower typhoon intake, cold air intake, pulleys, flowmasters, throttlebody and i think thats it. will it help or hurt?
 

WhiteFox342

Member
Sep 7, 2008
15
0
6
Sep 8, 2008
#2
  • Sep 8, 2008
  • #2
The off road X pipe will help if you are running a stock cat pipe. I don't think the long tubes will help. They would be better suited for a better flowing head / larger cam combo. Some equal length shorties would be better with a stock head 302.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Sep 8, 2008
#3
  • Sep 8, 2008
  • #3
Long tube headers have four problems
1.) They are harder to install than shorty headers and some long tubes will rub against the steering shaft.
2.) You will need a new H pipe since the long tubes place the collector flange farther back from the front of the car.
3.) Some long tube headers will not fit in AOD (auto trans) cars.
4.) The O2 sensors may not work as well because they are farther away from the exhaust valves . The O2 sensors don't get as hot as they should for best sensor accuracy. Because they don't work as good, gas mileage may decrease.

Other than that, they are a good thing for most cars. You will get a boost in mid RPM range power, but no more power at max RPM than shorty headers.

I like FMS stainless steel shorty headers because they don't have any of the above problems.
 

Zignas X

Member
Mar 12, 2008
39
0
6
CA
Sep 9, 2008
#4
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #4
so wut would be better some bbk short equal lenght or the unequal or the long tube bbk??? or a different brand??
 

LiquidGT

Member
Oct 8, 2007
368
0
16
Near STL hell
Sep 9, 2008
#5
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #5
You cant go wrong with the unequal length (shorty) headers, the equals can burn up the plug wires and they are harder to install.

A lot of people like the BBK headers, they have the one peice flange thats less likely to warp, but if you have the money get the FMS stainless shortys.
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Sep 9, 2008
#6
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #6
Another negitive to allot of the main brand name long tube headers is ground clearance.. allot of them hang real low and tend to make contact especially on lowered cars and on a stock motor looking at the initial price of the long tubes plus the more trouble they are to install against the shorty headers i'd go shorty. It's not worth what little gains if any you would see and i'd go unequal lenghts because the equal lenghts don't give you any more power and make plug changes allot more stressful
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Sep 9, 2008
#7
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #7
Whoever told you that long tubes will take power from your car should be kicked in the head... Hard. Performance wise, LTs can only help your car. Make sure to match the system with a quality 2.5" mid-pipe (X or H, I prefer X) and some 2.5" tails with quality chambered mufflers (Flowmaster, Bassani, Magnaflow, etc). Spend the extra green on stainless ceramic coated headers, as cheap chrome or painted ones tend to chip, peel and rust.
 

04gtboy

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
83
0
0
Sep 9, 2008
#8
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #8
I have BBK longtube headers and all u got to do is take the two motor mount nuts off and jack up the motor . Buy the matching mid pipe H or X its your choice and you do need 02 extenders BBk sells them . I got chrome but wish i got ceramic they turned blue soon as i started it !!!!
 
L

lang williams

New Member
Jun 11, 2003
567
0
0
cleveland, oh
Sep 9, 2008
#9
  • Sep 9, 2008
  • #9
I liked the equal length headers I had. Car felt stronger in the mid range. I had to ditch them when I got the gtp's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
309
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
D
Fuel pump upgrade
  • dkrupp79
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 10, 2025
Scrapla347
B
Engine 95 mustang Gt
  • Bett23
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
278
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 29, 2025
General karthief
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
644
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
M
Help! 2003 GT misfire when hot
  • Modular03
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
311
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 13, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?