• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

HiPo or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Detector
  • Start date Start date Mar 22, 2011

Detector

Active Member
Dec 12, 2004
62
10
29
Mar 22, 2011
#1
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #1
I bought a new project pony, a 1965 coupe C code, that someone has put a 6 cylinder in when it was originally a 289 v2. So I put an add in Craig's List looking for a 289 and I get a cal from a 70 year old guy who says he has several and one is a 66 HiPo. I was more interested in a 1964 289 with only 65,000 miles but thought what the heck I'll bargain on both. He also told me the HiPo now had a 2 barrel manifold he put on years ago for better gas mileage, and that it used to have a dual point distributor but he took it out and put it on a falcon. He says he has the manifold and it's an aluminum 4 barrel that says FORD on it.

Well I ended up giving him $500 for 3 motors, yup he had another clean looking one I couldn't pass up, and the manifold. My nephew went down and got them for me. I got them back last night and looking over the "HiPo" it sure looks to be the real thing from what I know and can see. Here is some pictures. What do you think?

Has the 289 cast with two dots not one and you can see it is screw in studs.





Has the cast number 20 in the corner of the head and you can see the spring pockets.



It has the thick harmonic balancer that measures 1.75"





The intake.



My new 1965 project.

 
P

Pony66

New Member
Jul 23, 2010
124
0
0
Mar 22, 2011
#2
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #2
It actually does look like a HIPO. It has the valve spring seats, screw in studs and balancer.
This is the first "HiPo" Ive seen that actually appears to be a HiPO.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2011
#3
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #3
I agree. The intake, of course, is not original. But it's obviously and over-the-counter Ford version of the Cobra intake, a nice upgrade.
 

Fstbk

Member
Sep 7, 2010
215
2
19
Mar 22, 2011
#4
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #4
That never happens to me. Nice find.
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Mar 22, 2011
#5
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #5
what about the bottom end of the motor? connecting rods and hatchet?
 

Detector

Active Member
Dec 12, 2004
62
10
29
Mar 22, 2011
#6
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #6
Going to pull the pan off and see whats down below.

What should it cost me to have this rebuilt?



 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2011
#7
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #7
Same as any 289 2V, really. A lot will depend on how bad it is. Now you need to break out the gauges and the Plastigage.

Well, you'll need a distributor. That'll add a bit.
 

hipo_p51

Member
Jun 13, 2008
199
2
19
Mar 22, 2011
#8
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #8
while you are at it, look for any vin numbers on the block. if its a real hipo, someone may pay a lot of dollars to buy it.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2011
#9
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #9
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Mar 22, 2011
#10
  • Mar 22, 2011
  • #10
Looks like a really good score!
 

Detector

Active Member
Dec 12, 2004
62
10
29
Mar 23, 2011
#11
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #11
Looks like it would be a waste to put in my C code 65 coupe. Once I check all the numbers, and bottom end, I might see about having it rebuilt and sell/trade it for a better project. I like my 65 coupe but it needs some serious body work and I'm going to get a lot of money wrapped up in it real quick. I'd rather put it on the back burner and work on it little at a time and find a more complete project.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2011
#12
  • Mar 23, 2011
  • #12
Putting it back to original configuration wouldn't be too hard. You'd need an intake, carb, air cleaner, distributor, and valve covers.

If you're planning to use it, you'll need a flywheel. Only problem with that is the 289HP wheels were the same ones used on 289 2V and 289 4V engines, but instead of the usual 28.2 oz imbalance, the 289HP wheel was balanced to 30.4 oz.
 

Detector

Active Member
Dec 12, 2004
62
10
29
Mar 24, 2011
#13
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #13
I pulled the pan last night and I'm still confused. It has the crank weightbob, it has the polished point on the most aft counterweight used to check nodular levels met specs, it has the 3/8" rod bolts, but the caps don't look right.

Block numbers.



Weightbob.



polished aft counterweight.



Caps.

 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Mar 24, 2011
#14
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #14
Not HiPo caps. I wonder if someone either threw a rod through the HiPo block and used what was left, or was building a HiPo themselves with a regular 289.
 
2

2+2GT

10 Year Member
Apr 25, 2009
3,333
10
79
Southeastern Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 2011
#15
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #15
The only thing odd here is the caps. Everything else is proper HP.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Mar 24, 2011
#16
  • Mar 24, 2011
  • #16
2+2GT said:
The only thing odd here is the caps. Everything else is proper HP.
Click to expand...

Pretty much I wonder if it has the correct camshaft.
 
R

runawayabc123

Member
Mar 9, 2007
192
0
16
Wisconsin
Mar 25, 2011
#17
  • Mar 25, 2011
  • #17
What are the date codes on the heads and are they close to the block?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
54
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
75
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
650
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Tuesday at 8:10 AM
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
29
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Tuesday at 8:10 AM
GOvert
G
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
149
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?