• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Holly Terminator X or Megasquirt

  • Thread starter Thread starter SFR
  • Start date Start date May 6, 2021
S

SFR

New Member
Apr 12, 2021
16
1
3
Sudbury, MA
May 6, 2021
#1
  • May 6, 2021
  • #1
Hi All -
I know this has been discussed and I have read the threads but would like more opinions/real world experience.

Trying to decide on either Terminator or MS.
I‘m Ok replacing the the wiring harness if I decide on the Terminator.

Specifically, wondering which is better and widely supported (by tuners and company’s tech support).
I’m old school so have been using Holly products since the 80’s...so know they have good products and support.

Not familiar with MS - how is the product and support.
Given the two, which one would’ve you chose and why?

My goal is to have a ‘nice running engine‘ - it’s in a 1976 Bronco.

My setup is pretty mild:
- GT 40p heads, GT40 upper and lower Intake, 1.72 lift rockers, stock cam, 24# injectors with matching MAF (C&L 76mm) And headers.

Thanks
 

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,721
214
Hillsborough county
May 6, 2021
#2
  • May 6, 2021
  • #2
In a setup that mild why not just run the stock ECU?

The MS vs Holley debate boils down to which one of each unit? a 350 MS entry level ecu should not be compared to a sequential fire ecu at 4x the cost.

Really it boils down to familiarity, I like the MS platforms because I am very familiar with them. They do everything [MS3] I could think of and then some, more if you can write your own code for .ini files...

Holley has the support, they are a HUGE corporation that own more than half the companies... The terminator is very simplistic and not as easy as some think they are to work with, alot of the needed settings are locked away to keep it easy to use for a beginner [just my opinion from tuning a few, they do work nice]
 
Reactions: mikestang63

marcelo

Active Member
Feb 25, 2018
215
48
38
Quepos, Costa Rica, Central America
May 6, 2021
#3
  • May 6, 2021
  • #3
I changed from MS to Holley Terminator X .. first tune and first drive ..and this is to good to be true...Car runs great from beginning...Idle is like a rock and system seems to work perfect ..... but yes ..install needs some time to do it right and it needs to be tuned ... you cant drive ..out of the Box .. its not a real Plug n Play ..but there are also a lot of helpfull videos en utube....take your time and watch it !!! nothing wrong with MS but today ..the Holley Terminator seems to be the way to go ...??!!
 

jchock

New Member
Dec 30, 2020
3
0
1
Dallas
Dec 29, 2021
#4
  • Dec 29, 2021
  • #4
I’m looking at running a Terminator x on my 2000 GT 2V. There are A LOT of videos on YouTube and the Holley Tx looks very simplistic to use. The best feature I have watched and read about is the ECUs ability to learn in the background. thoughts….
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,485
8,706
234
S.I.NY
Dec 30, 2021
#5
  • Dec 30, 2021
  • #5
jchock said:
I’m looking at running a Terminator x on my 2000 GT 2V. There are A LOT of videos on YouTube and the Holley Tx looks very simplistic to use. The best feature I have watched and read about is the ECUs ability to learn in the background. thoughts….
Click to expand...
The ecu calls it learning . In reality it’s trimming like a stock ecu. You need a good tune to be close for it to shine . Relying on it to self tune is not the way to go and is my only gripe with holleys advertising . I have had a HP in my car since 17
 
Reactions: mikestang63

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 30, 2021
#6
  • Dec 30, 2021
  • #6
IF you want the closest to true plug and play go with the PRO M. You cannot compare the quality, fitment and ease of install. Downside is Chris is THE support and not many people tune it- but honestly that is for reason in that it doesn't need it like the Holley. IMO the stock EEC and a good tune is enough for most builds. Personally I don't see what the hopla is about the Holley system- you need to re use wiring from the stock harness for your A/C .airbag, and other components for them to work and 90% of the people then go and need to get it tuned anyway to dial it in. If you go onto the Terminator boards you are seeing post after post about poor quality control on the harnesses and months to wait for delivery. I think when you factor in the cost of it $1500 or so. then add in the sensors, A/C harness,. and then additional tuning you are well over $2000.

just my 2 cents
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,485
8,706
234
S.I.NY
Dec 30, 2021
#7
  • Dec 30, 2021
  • #7
mikestang63 said:
IF you want the closest to true plug and play go with the PRO M. You cannot compare the quality, fitment and ease of install. Downside is Chris is THE support and not many people tune it- but honestly that is for reason in that it doesn't need it like the Holley. IMO the stock EEC and a good tune is enough for most builds. Personally I don't see what the hopla is about the Holley system- you need to re use wiring from the stock harness for your A/C .airbag, and other components for them to work and 90% of the people then go and need to get it tuned anyway to dial it in. If you go onto the Terminator boards you are seeing post after post about poor quality control on the harnesses and months to wait for delivery. I think when you factor in the cost of it $1500 or so. then add in the sensors, A/C harness,. and then additional tuning you are well over $2000.

just my 2 cents
Click to expand...
You only replace the engine harness thats it - As you do with any aftermarket standalone besides the plug and play stuff . The allure is the fact that you aren’t dealing with a 28 plus year old engine harness . My holley - I tied into my fuel pump trigger wire at the relay under my seat . Any additional wiring is for stuff you plan on adding that’s it’s capable of doing or controlling .

Now I’ll admit since the terminators the harnesses haven’t been what they were when I bought mine .

They are still light years better then having an old harness as long as you’re willing to go over it quickly to make sure it’s all good.

Next thing is - of course all you hear is complaints on a terminator. The price point draws in a crowd that may have not gone for a stand alone otherwise and expects it to just be magic . It isn’t .

None of them are . Also when they are selling that many of them there is bound to be complaining .
Look up MS complaints and you’ll find plenty as well.

With that said I have personally been involved with 3 different terminator setups including first starts and they are all running around flawlessly. 2 Ford based 4.6 single turbo and 347 T trim car , one LS motor car that’s getting a blower . I’m in the process of doing a 4150 stealth on a big block olds as well .

Any of the setups including the pro m would need to be tuned considering the fact I’d you’re making the jump your setup is far beyond what a stock processor will do .
 
Reactions: RaggedGT

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Dec 30, 2021
#8
  • Dec 30, 2021
  • #8
Do you currently have a factory efi wiring harness?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Fox Closed PCV System, Dual Valve Catch Can
  • RTW0223
  • Dec 6, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 30, 2021
jay98
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
N
SOLD Supercharged 1989 SSP Coupe $13,500 obo
  • notchlubber
  • Jul 17, 2018
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
13K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 28, 2020
notchlubber
N
On The First Day Of My Vacation......
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jul 20, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 21, 2014
95BlueStallion
  • Locked
Just Some Suggestion's For Foxes
  • Detroiit
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 25, 2014
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?