horizontal vs vertical

94 3.8l stang · Aug 13, 2004

Ghostalker said:
because thats the only 2 years that model had both those tails and a 5.0 option...

Another good point.

94 3.8l stang · Aug 13, 2004

The Brahma Bull said:
But the tailights dont make people thinks its a Cobra or GT...thats just stupid. Thats like saying 96+ makes people think it might have a 4.6 or something.

The 96 4.6 was a dog too. unless you swapped in a DOHC.

Ernad · Aug 13, 2004

94 3.8l stang said:
The 96 4.6 was a dog too. unless you swapped in a DOHC.

It would still beat you. And it's not like your (and mine) 3.8's are the creme of the crop.

The Brahma Bull · Aug 13, 2004

94 3.8l stang said:
Thank you. I didn't want to have to embarrass the poor brahma. you did it for me.

Uh and how was I embarrassed? I switched vertical and horizontal. So what? What was said still makes no f'n sense whatso ever. Just because you have horizontal lights, it doesnt hint that you have a 5.0. It just says you have a 94 or 95 year Mustang. 94 and 95 V6's, GT's, and Cobra's shared lights. So how would a V6 with vertical lights hint at having a 5.0? Thats the dumbest thing said in this thread. Period.

But calling inanimate objects "ghey" is a VERY close second.

97v6Silver · Aug 15, 2004

ghey = teh suxxerz = teh looz

GREENBIOCH · Aug 15, 2004

Which way is Vertical??

ganador01 · Aug 16, 2004

GREENBIOCH said:
Which way is Vertical??

bad bioch! no!

98CobraClone · Aug 16, 2004

97v6Silver said:
ghey = teh suxxerz = teh looz

HUH????????

97v6Silver · Aug 16, 2004

you know noes!? ohh noes

Xaranthu · Aug 17, 2004

I may have missed the pole, but I can give my opinion.

I never liked the horizonal lights. Sorry. Just not Mustang. Even less so than the Fox, and that rendition was as far away from Mustang heritage in every aspect a modle could be... by name and power plant alone - we were told it was a Mustang, and so we believed it.

Now Brahma. I'm a little shocked that you seem to have completely missed the point of the horisonal lights to engine size. Two fassets of this statement are; the 4.6 guys - and other mustang owners and fans - would be the one's wondering if the car was a 5.0 or not until they could see badging, and those inside the world of mustang are not going to approch a Mustang with Horizonal lights and assume it's a 4.6, are they?

...Oh, did you forget about the 4.6?

Z.

The Brahma Bull · Aug 17, 2004

This is still without a doubt the dumbest thread and dumbest replies ever.

THEY ARE LIGHTS. AND THE VERTICLES are S-E-X-Y.

And Xathwhatever, that arguement still makes no f'n sense whatso ever. No one is going to assume anything, and if they try to assume anything about a cars engine size because of the tailights, they are retards. The only thing the light will show you is an approx of what year of a car it is. And even doing that wont always be right because plenty of losers have switched out thier sexy verticals for horizontals and I've even seen stock 98's with the vert lights.

ganador01 · Aug 17, 2004

The Brahma Bull said:
This is still without a doubt the dumbest thread and dumbest replies ever.

THEY ARE LIGHTS. AND THE VERTICLES are S-E-X-Y.

And Xathwhatever, that arguement still makes no f'n sense whatso ever. No one is going to assume anything, and if they try to assume anything about a cars engine size because of the tailights, they are retards. The only thing the light will show you is an approx of what year of a car it is. And even doing that wont always be right because plenty of losers have switched out thier sexy verticals for horizontals and I've even seen stock 98's with the vert lights.

and ive seen many more 94-95s who have switched to verticals. In fact, ive never seen a 96+ with horizontals...that would be a find...

94 3.8l stang · Aug 17, 2004

People are f***kin ignorant, brahma for instance, I get asked all the time if i have the six or the 5.0 because people see the horizontals. If they see a newer car with verticals. They assume its a 4.6 SOHC,DOHC, or Not so doggy six. Well, my point is I just say," yep its a six". No need to go bein a ingorant jack ass insulting everyone. Prick...

The Brahma Bull · Aug 17, 2004

get asked all the time if i have the six or the 5.0 because people see the horizontals.

Me too, but only because my exhaust and the fact that most people think all Mustangs have 5.0's. What you people fail to realize is the average person doesnt know the damn difference in any of the tail lights. They just see a Mustang.

No need to go bein a ingorant jack ass insulting everyone. Prick...

Before calling people "ingorant" please make sure you can spell the word.

Also "jack ass" is one word.

CManT1914 · Aug 18, 2004

I love the horizontals, they look so mean at night. Plus, if I see a GT with the horizontals, I think, "Hey, it might be a 5.0!" It means something to me, cus there's not very many 94-95 GT's around here anymore. I love seeing them. But there are SOOO many 96+ GT's.

ganador01 · Aug 18, 2004

The Brahma Bull said:
Me too, but only because my exhaust and the fact that most people think all Mustangs have 5.0's. What you people fail to realize is the average person doesnt know the damn difference in any of the tail lights. They just see a Mustang.

Before calling people "ingorant" please make sure you can spell the word.

Also "jack ass" is one word.

Lol...he kinda got ya there...if ur gonna post about being ignorant and a jackass...might as well spell them correctly...lol. I still don't agree with u bout the lights now! Lol. btw don't piss brahma off too much...he carries a golden Deagle (cs speak)...lol

Ernad · Aug 18, 2004

ganador01 said:
.... btw don't piss brahma off too much...he carries a golden Deagle (cs speak)...lol

I remember that thread...

94 3.8l stang · Aug 18, 2004

I typed it quick cause it pissed me off, thats all. English and grammar have nothing to do with my statement i made towards you. You get no applause from me for correcting a post like its a term paper. Golden DE does kick ass, but he'd ruin its good looks if he even shot it, if its shootable.
A good glock is always more of a threat then a golden show gun.

Ghostalker · Aug 19, 2004

glock = 9mm and square
Deagle = .50 Caliber and intimidating!
(speaking of cs speak, cs:source = da bomb)
Although, i would prolly rather had something along the lines of an H&K MK23... .45 is fine for me close enough to a .50, lol
but as we all know, the master of sniper rifles = PSG-1... its f*n god-like!

The Brahma Bull · Aug 19, 2004

94 3.8l stang said:
Golden DE does kick ass, but he'd ruin its good looks if he even shot it, if its shootable.
A good glock is always more of a threat then a golden show gun.

Wow, even more ignorance. My titanium gold Desert Eagle is one of the hardest finishes ever put on a gun. It isn't 24k and my gun already has over 300 rounds through it.

And no Glock is as intimidating as my DE...case in point..

Although, i would prolly rather had something along the lines of an H&K MK23

How about a HK USP .45? I got one of those too.

horizontal vs vertical

Horizontal Lights or Vertical?

Horizontal

Vertical

94 3.8l stang

New Member

94 3.8l stang

New Member

Ernad

celibate sans pants

The Brahma Bull

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,

GREENBIOCH

ganador01

98CobraClone

New Member

97v6Silver

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,

Xaranthu

The Brahma Bull

ganador01

94 3.8l stang

New Member

The Brahma Bull

CManT1914

New Member

ganador01

Ernad

celibate sans pants

94 3.8l stang

New Member

Ghostalker

Member

The Brahma Bull

Similar threads

horizontal vs vertical

Horizontal Lights or Vertical?

Horizontal

Vertical

New Member

New Member

celibate sans pants

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,

New Member

it came to $4.56 and i got $0.44 change from a 5,

New Member

New Member

celibate sans pants

New Member

Member

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency