• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

How Common Were Factory Non-A/C Cars?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ReefBlueHatch
  • Start date Start date Apr 19, 2010

ReefBlueHatch

Active Member
Jan 12, 2010
682
96
39
Central KY
Apr 19, 2010
#1
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #1
Seems like most of the Fox 5.0's I've seen came with air conditioning. How common were factory non-A/C cars?
 

Hawaiian5.0GT

New Member
Dec 26, 2009
72
0
0
Apr 19, 2010
#2
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #2
It must be some what rare.I've only seen a few 5.0 Mustangs with out a/c.A friend of mine has a 87 or 88 GT parts car with manual windows,5spd and no a/c.My 90 GT doesn't have a rear window defroster but it was from Hawaii.
 

RARE NOTCH

Member
Nov 3, 2007
73
0
6
Ohio
Apr 19, 2010
#3
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #3
Pretty rare. i have a no option notch that has no power and no a/c and no rear defrost. the only options on my car are the 5.0 motor and a am/fm cassette.They called the no option package the drag pack from what i have found out about it. i am just waiting for the marti report to do 79,93 mustangs to find out how many were made with this option.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 19, 2010
#4
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #4
I think AC was basically standard...or you had to order a car without it because i've never seen a non-AC car in a junkyard...ever, and every Mustang i've seen that was stock had it. If i ever saw a non AC car, i probably didn't even know it and just assumed the owner deleted it.
 

ReefBlueHatch

Active Member
Jan 12, 2010
682
96
39
Central KY
Apr 19, 2010
#5
  • Apr 19, 2010
  • #5
I've been curious about this ever since I bought my car. My car has power windows, locks, cruise, defrosters; but no A/C. It was built in Aug of '93. If you look at the heat control panel, you can see there is not as many selections on the right knob.
 

1987LXragtop

Member
Jan 26, 2008
837
3
18
Just outside Philly PA
Apr 20, 2010
#6
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #6
I think thats pretty cool. Clean car too. Find out the history of the car. I wonder if the would have been more prevelant in cars bought further north where the summers arent so rough.
 

adidas

Member
Apr 3, 2004
123
0
16
Liberty, Mo
Apr 20, 2010
#7
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #7
never really thought about it... thats cool.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Apr 20, 2010
#8
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #8
1987GTragtop said:
I think thats pretty cool. Clean car too. Find out the history of the car. I wonder if the would have been more prevelant in cars bought further north where the summers arent so rough.
Click to expand...

I would say more than likely, as there is definitely a trend with rear defrost according to the area they where sold in. Another odd item is rear defrost on coupes, regardless of where they where sold.
 

speedtrip

Member
May 22, 2005
93
5
9
Jerkwater, U.S.A
Apr 20, 2010
#9
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #9
I have no option 87 lx coupe. No power or ac all it has is tilt, heat, radio, rear defrost and the 5.0. Weighed 2850 lbs that was with no passenger or rear seat and gastank on E.
 

ReefBlueHatch

Active Member
Jan 12, 2010
682
96
39
Central KY
Apr 20, 2010
#10
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #10
1987GTragtop said:
I think thats pretty cool. Clean car too. Find out the history of the car. I wonder if the would have been more prevelant in cars bought further north where the summers arent so rough.
Click to expand...

I'd like to know the history. The previous owner didn't know jack about anything. In the owner's manual there is a salesman's card from a Ford dealership in Cincinnati, so it could have been bought there new. Also, my car has 3.08s; was that also a ordered option?
 

fiveohwblow

Official Member
15 Year Member
Jul 21, 2005
2,169
145
155
Apr 20, 2010
#11
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #11
My first car I ever owned when I was 15 years old was a no option 88 GT. Had manual windows, no ac but it did have power locks and mirrors. Thing was sure fast!
 

cusp

Member
Jun 13, 2009
61
2
19
Santa Barbara
Apr 20, 2010
#12
  • Apr 20, 2010
  • #12
Up until the middle 70s, AC was considered special and always added significant cost to the sticker. By the mid 80s AC was no longer an option but standard equipment. Even my no frills 2001 Ranger has AC. Cars get better miles per gallon on the highway with the windows up and the ac running vs cruising with the windows down. Must be what happened.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Apr 24, 2010
#13
  • Apr 24, 2010
  • #13
Air conditioning was NOT standard equipment in ANY Fox ('79-'93) Mustang. It was either a stand-alone option or part of an optional 'preferred equipment package'.

Rear defrost was NOT standard, in any bodystyle, unless it was required by law in certain regions or states (i.e. Canada or Northern/Northeastern US states).

The 3.08:1 ratio was either standard equipment or a no-cost option over the 2.73:1 ratio. Whether it was standard or an optional upgrade depended on the model year and the transmission.
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
Apr 24, 2010
#14
  • Apr 24, 2010
  • #14
Strippt means stripped, my LX is original AC delete, crank window, no defrost 88- I don't know how rare it is, but I never saw one like it before I found it, and I been playing with 5.0's since 87
 
T

THOR74

New Member
Dec 5, 2009
72
0
0
Ontario, Canada
Apr 25, 2010
#15
  • Apr 25, 2010
  • #15
Up here in Canada, my 91 GT came with 2.73s, rear defrost, a/c, kph speedo, daytime running lights and a BLOCK HEATER. Oh yeah, and the official name for it was "Ford Mustang Cobra GT", even though it's no different than a US GT. I've read conflicting accounts of why this was done by Ford.

The cord on that block heater has never been unwrapped. My car has never been even remotely winter driven and never will. I think it would be a horrible winter vehicle, with all that power and the traction-lok rear end. Complete fishtail city - if you could even get going...

Good friend of mine has owned, since 1991, a 1989 5.0 LX hatch that has no a/c and has crank windows and manual locks and virtually no options at all.

I do agree that it seems as if many more cars had the a/c.

My 91 GT officially weighs in at about 3150 pounds whereas a 91 LX 5.0 Sport, when minimally equipped, tipped the scales in the 2750 plus pound range. As well, the GT stickered for about 20,000 and the LX could be had for 12,000 (Canadian dollars).
 

JadeGT

New Member
Mar 4, 2007
27
0
2
Guam
Apr 26, 2010
#16
  • Apr 26, 2010
  • #16
ReefBlueHatch said:
I'd like to know the history. The previous owner didn't know jack about anything. In the owner's manual there is a salesman's card from a Ford dealership in Cincinnati, so it could have been bought there new. Also, my car has 3.08s; was that also a ordered option?
Click to expand...

Look at the door tag and find the DSO. It should be two digits. It will tell you the region where the car was originally "ordered" for. By ordered I mean internally by Ford.

The following is just my opinion and I have no facts to back it up.

For the 87-93's it is much more common to find non-A/C cars earlier rather than later. I also think there were more LX than GT's without A/C. As stated above it is more common to find cars with northern DSO's without A/C.

Of course there were a lot less 93's made vs 87's so that could be part of it.

Ford and the dealers make a lot of money off the options so it is in their interest to sell factory A/C cars.

BTW Hawaii doesn't have its own DSO.

I have a Mustang that was sold new in Guam, with an export DSO, and it has a rear window defroster.


Other odd trivia. New York state requires rear window defroster and for 1993 they required million mile odometers (7 Digit). So Mustangs that had the New York DSO for 1993 had both. That included 1993 Cobras.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Apr 26, 2010
#17
  • Apr 26, 2010
  • #17
JadeGT said:
New York state requires rear window defroster...
Click to expand...
I don't know when that became law, but my '83 GT doesn't have rear defrost. It was ordered through the Buffalo DSO.
 

JadeGT

New Member
Mar 4, 2007
27
0
2
Guam
Apr 26, 2010
#18
  • Apr 26, 2010
  • #18
FoxChasis said:
I don't know when that became law, but my '83 GT doesn't have rear defrost. It was ordered through the Buffalo DSO.
Click to expand...

A quick trip to google turned up this. Its late so hell if I can figure it out.


Vehicle & Traffic Law - Vehicle Equipment

Defrosters 39. Every motor vehicle registered in this state and manufactured or assembled after October first, nineteen hundred sixty-four shall be equipped with a defrosting device, in good working order, for the purpose of preventing the formation of snow or ice on the windshield directly in front of the operator. For the purposes of this subdivision the term "motor vehicle" shall exclude motorcycles, tractors used exclusively for agricultural purposes, self-propelled combines, self-propelled harvesting machines and farm equipment and self-propelled caterpillar or crawler-type equipment while being operated on the contract site.

10-b. It shall be unlawful after June thirtieth, nineteen hundred seventy-three to operate on any public highway or street in this state, any passenger type motor vehicle except convertible, suburban and omnibus or other motor vehicle that has a roll-down rear window or a rear window or windows located in a movable closure (door-like) member registered in this state, manufactured or assembled after said date, and designated as a nineteen hundred seventy-four or subsequent model unless such vehicle be equipped with a rear window defogger or defroster, which shall be so located and adjusted that its operation will give the operator of such vehicle, by means of the mirror or other reflecting device required by subdivision ten of this section, a view of the road and the condition of traffic behind such vehicle.

10-c. It shall be unlawful after June thirtieth, nineteen hundred eighty-five to operate on any public highway or street in this state, any passenger type motor vehicle that has a rear window or windows located in a movable closure (door-like) member, except for a multipurpose passenger vehicle (designed to carry ten persons or less and constructed either on a truck chassis or with special features for occasional off-road operation) registered in this state and manufactured or assembled after said date, and designated as a nineteen hundred eighty-six or subsequent model unless such vehicle be equipped with a rear window defogger or defroster, which shall be so located and adjusted that its operation will give the operator of such vehicle, by means of the mirror or other reflecting device required by subdivision ten of this section, a view of the road and the condition of traffic behind such vehicle.

10-d. It shall be unlawful after December thirty-first, nineteen hundred ninety-two to operate on any public highway or street in this state, any passenger type motor vehicle that has a rear window located in a single movable closure (door-like) member and which has a non-removeable top, registered in this state and manufactured or assembled after said date, and designated as a nineteen hundred ninety-three or subsequent model unless such vehicle be equipped with a rear window defogger or defroster, which shall be so located and adjusted that its operation will give the operator of such vehicle, by means of the mirror or other reflecting device required by subdivision ten of this section, a view of the road and the condition of traffic behind such vehicle.
Click to expand...
 

oldskolbus

Founding Member
Apr 30, 2002
258
13
29
WV
Apr 26, 2010
#19
  • Apr 26, 2010
  • #19
no power options here except radio.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
347 with Vortech V2 and Holley quick fuel, AFR Renegades a tremec tko 600 advice for newbie pls
  • Schargedfox
  • Jul 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
442
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 3, 2026
Schargedfox
S
T
Newbie looking for some info on speedo gears
  • TDM389
  • Nov 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
264
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 16, 2025
TDM389
T
B
Take a look at my rack!
  • bicknell
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
724
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
Willybill32
B
Purchasing 1st Fox, need advice
  • Blown02svt
  • May 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
manicmechanic007
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
439
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?