• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

how do i get to 7000rpm red line

  • Thread starter Thread starter stanggt00
  • Start date Start date Mar 31, 2006
S

stanggt00

New Member
Jul 16, 2003
371
0
0
baltimore md
Mar 31, 2006
#1
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #1
ok my question is simple most of the 4.6 stangs have a red line of about 6-6.5k
what i want to know is whats more important the heads or the bottom end when it comes to moving the red line of a motor up

example it in the heads is it the camms or valve springs
in the motor is it the type of rods or crank

or could it just be in the computer or a combo of all of these things



my goal here it to put together a nice motor that can hold about 500-600hp
with a red line of about 7000rpms
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Mar 31, 2006
#2
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #2
Everything you mentioned is involved, but the main thing keeping us from 7k is the crankshaft.
 

reddrgn01gt

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
161
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Mar 31, 2006
#3
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #3
Too hold that kind of power and spin that high you will need a forged bottom end and cams + valve springs.
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Mar 31, 2006
#4
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #4
stanggt00 said:
ok my question is simple most of the 4.6 stangs have a red line of about 6-6.5k
what i want to know is whats more important the heads or the bottom end when it comes to moving the red line of a motor up

example it in the heads is it the camms or valve springs
in the motor is it the type of rods or crank

or could it just be in the computer or a combo of all of these things



my goal here it to put together a nice motor that can hold about 500-600hp
with a red line of about 7000rpms
Click to expand...

Generally the first bad thing to happen is PTVC.
 
0

01Steeda

New Member
May 29, 2005
732
0
0
Baton Rouge, LA
Mar 31, 2006
#5
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #5
CanadaStang said:
Generally the first bad thing to happen is PTVC.
Click to expand...


thats what happened to me lol.

cams/valsprings.. crank.. should do it. I wouldnt say I am at a 7000 redline, but my rev is set there now
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Mar 31, 2006
#6
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #6
buy a cobra
 

DBMSTNG

I fantasize about it being BIG!
Founding Member
Apr 23, 2002
2,120
0
56
not quite here
Mar 31, 2006
#7
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #7
a well balanced rotating assembly, heads, cams, and proper valvesprings will do it.
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Mar 31, 2006
#8
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #8
what everyone mentioned above but a 4V would get you there faster also how much are you willing to spend for that is a big question....
 

'13_ImpactBlue_GT

Angry Little Elf
Mar 30, 2005
872
2
98
Where the men are men and the sheep are nervous
Mar 31, 2006
#9
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #9
Whats PTVC? Piston to Valve Contact?
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Mar 31, 2006
#10
  • Mar 31, 2006
  • #10
Toms_2003_Stang said:
Whats PTVC? Piston to Valve Contact?
Click to expand...
yes
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Apr 1, 2006
#11
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #11
sgarlic said:
Everything you mentioned is involved, but the main thing keeping us from 7k is the crankshaft.
Click to expand...

No, it is the stock valve train in the heads that prevent a higher RPM limit. Valves float at the higher RPM causing PTV and blown motors. The next issue is the stock pistons and rods.

There is nothing wrong with the stock crankshaft. With proper pistons/rods and a good valve train in the heads, the only thing preventing an even higher RPM is the heads. I know of quite a few cars that are pushing over 7500 RPM on the stock crankshaft with no problems, however these cars do have forged pistons and rods as well as upgraded heads.

Show me an example( Post a link ) of a failed 2V crankshaft where the crankshaft was the problem. I have asked for this at other boards and have yet to see an example of it.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Apr 1, 2006
#12
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #12
TGJ-

I agree. It's the connecting rods that fail. I've learned a lot about this stuff with my Lightning. The 4.6's actually are a lot stouter than everybody thinks. What kills them is detonation after 400rwhp. People get too aggressive with their tunes, run the too lean, detonate, and then lose a rod. If you keep them rich you can see 500hp with less problems....I didn't say no problems....less.
 
S

stanggt00

New Member
Jul 16, 2003
371
0
0
baltimore md
Apr 1, 2006
#13
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #13
hmm thxs for the input guys

so a forged motor with some camms and heads should do it

question about the 4v is it a direct swap

i mean can i just drop a mark 1 motor in my gt and be happy with out a lot of modifications
 

Stang|ess

seeking cyber partner(s)
Oct 18, 2003
941
0
37
Hawaii
Apr 1, 2006
#14
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #14
you don't need a forged block to rev to 7000.

cams, head, and don't forget valve springs. I'm assuming stage 2 cams would be in this application, so don't forget supporting mods such as gears.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Apr 1, 2006
#15
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #15
.. or toilet paper.
 

jstreet0204

Active Member
Jun 26, 2003
939
0
36
Winston Salem, NC
Apr 1, 2006
#16
  • Apr 1, 2006
  • #16
sgarlic said:
Everything you mentioned is involved, but the main thing keeping us from 7k is the crankshaft.
Click to expand...

KenB on modular depot revs to 7500 with a stock cast crank.
n/a 4v motors have a 6800 redline with the same rods and pistons as the 2v's have as far as I know. So I don't think the bottom end is a problem if the valve springs are strong enough to keep the valves from floating and hitting a piston.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New motor help. First start successful. Now will not turn over.
  • SavStang
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
132
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
SavStang
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
517
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
518
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?