• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

How do I make 360 Rwhp

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigbird04
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

bigbird04

Active Member
Jul 15, 2010
106
7
38
Decatur Al.
Sep 1, 2010
#1
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #1
Last car was a 99 Z28, full bolt ons netted me 356 Rwhp and 362 fLbs. How do I make similar power out of a 2V 04 GT. Nitrous is not out of the question, (although I'd like to make some of it with bolt ons) I know these cars don't respond to exhaust and cold air kits like ls1s do . I know they like boost and nitrous though. How much juice is a stock 2V up to, dry/wet ? F bodie guys love harris speed works anyone runnining their plate kit on a 4.6 ? Its going to be a fun street car not a dd though.
 

slayerripkdc

15 Year Member
Jun 3, 2003
1,341
16
59
brewster ny
Sep 1, 2010
#2
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #2
125 wet shot You can also go with some Trickflow heads, Hi-t stage 2's and some long tubes. That will get you close to your goal.
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Sep 1, 2010
#3
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #3
Firstly, your GT is about 200 lbs lighter than your Z, so the same performance can be had for less power. However, long tubes and an H-pipe will get you a good 20-30 rwhp, and some serious cams and heads on top of that would get you the rest of the way to your goal... but really, slapping a Kenne Bell on top would get you there in one fell swoop. Also, these cars respond very well to gears.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 1, 2010
#4
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #4
It's hard to compare a 5.7L LS1 to an engine down more than a liter in displacement, especially the 2V modular. Let's face it: The 281 cubic inch 2V mod with its 3.55" bore is never going to be the power or torque monster that the LS1 can be in normally aspirated form. Even the newest 5L "Coyote" 4V "only" puts down ~360 to the wheels and it's claimed to have the best flowing heads this side of F1. A stock blown Terminator Cobra 4V puts down similar numbers.

As slayer said, you can bolt on aftermarket heads (the only ones available for the 4.6) from Trickflow, get some aggressive cams and an exhaust and I'll add a short-runner Reichard racing intake manifold and you might approach that HP number but it'll be at fairly high RPM.

You need to make up for the lack of cubes with artificial respiration, IMO, if you're looking for the kick in the ass that an LS1 will give. This means a blower or nitrous. A stock 5-speed 2V PI motor will make ~230HP at the wheels. The stock bottom end is safe up to the 400-425rwHP range on a safe tune so you could, in theory, bolt on a 125-shot and get what you want with a reasonable margin of safety.
 

bigbird04

Active Member
Jul 15, 2010
106
7
38
Decatur Al.
Sep 1, 2010
#5
  • Sep 1, 2010
  • #5
Thanks, yes I know gears but if I'm gonna spray which ones. Can't go s/c route (money) (wife). So is 125 wet safe on bottom end ? Thanks for quick response.
 
J

Jim@CMS

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
23
0
0
Sep 2, 2010
#6
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #6
Trick Flow heads and my CMS Stage 2 N/A cams made 355rwhp through an auto and STOCK intake. Your goals are easily attainable N/A.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Sep 2, 2010
#7
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #7
I have the Harris Speed Works plate kit on my GT. I like it a lot, fitment was great.

Currently a 100 shot, but I'm tempted to move it up. If the engine is in good shape, a 125 shot shouldn't be an issue. Just make sure to back down a couple degrees of timing. It'd be a good idea to upgrade the fuel pump (an SVT Focus fuel pump is not too expensive and a great upgrade) just to be sure. And of course, it's also a good idea to have the air/fuel ratio verified via dyno or wideband.
 

bigbird04

Active Member
Jul 15, 2010
106
7
38
Decatur Al.
Sep 2, 2010
#8
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #8
Jim your set up sounds like its making great power. I wouldn't imagined a 4.6 (N/A) making 355 none the less an auto. If you don't mind me asking roughly how much did the heads, cams, gaskets,ect cost, just parts not labor. I'm basically a mechanic for a living. I feel confident doing the wrench turning myself ( plus a few friends and beers give or take ) I'd leave the tuning to an expert though.

Burningrubber judging by your times sounds like you are right where I want to be also. I have a few questions though.

Are 410s to much gear for your car, is first even usefull with spray ?
Do you have harris's controller, if so how do you like it ?
If you don't mind how much did your set up cost ? I think I probably do a good kit for 1000-1500 dollars
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 2, 2010
#9
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #9
Trick Flow Specialties TFS-K519-390-375 - Trick Flow® Twisted Wedge® Top-End Engine Kits for Ford 4.6/5.4L 2V - Overview - SummitRacing.com. enough said, youll have the potential of 380hp, but will definitly see anywhere from 330-365hp and thats with a stock bottom end.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 2, 2010
#10
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #10
oh and thank you trick flow i was about to give on my lil 281cid motor.
 

bigbird04

Active Member
Jul 15, 2010
106
7
38
Decatur Al.
Sep 2, 2010
#11
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #11
Thanks 97 , thats not a bad deal for 100 plus N/A horsepower !
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 2, 2010
#12
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #12
no problem, check out cms maybe pm jim i bet he'll have a killer set of cams to put you at the 380hp mark after a good tune on the dyno.
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Sep 2, 2010
#13
  • Sep 2, 2010
  • #13
As mentioned already, its not hard to hit 350+rwhp naturally aspirated on a 2V.

Full exhaust, TF heads, cams and you're there.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 3, 2010
#14
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #14
and a hell of a lot safer too compared to F/I
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Sep 3, 2010
#15
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #15
fast97gt said:
and a hell of a lot safer too compared to F/I
Click to expand...

Not really, power is power. If the internals can withstand 450 Hp, and you build a combination that makes 500 Hp with those internals, it's going to blow up just the same whether you used FI or an N/A build to do it.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Sep 3, 2010
#16
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #16
ChillPhatCat said:
Not really, power is power. If the internals can withstand 450 Hp, and you build a combination that makes 500 Hp with those internals, it's going to blow up just the same whether you used FI or an N/A build to do it.
Click to expand...

High power on small-displacement engines like the 4.6 generally means lots of RPM. I'd rather use higher cylinder pressures and a safe tune than a ton of RPM and a leaner tune to achieve the same power, especially on a 2V variant that has the disadvantage compared to the 4V motor of larger, heavier valves to control.

Plus the added bonus of that cylinder pressure is torque (at least for positive displacement blowers) down low, something a stock 4.6 is lacking and which is only made worse when the powerband is moved up in the RPM band on a 4.6 tuned for high power.
 
J

Jim@CMS

New Member
Jan 5, 2008
23
0
0
Sep 3, 2010
#17
  • Sep 3, 2010
  • #17
bigbird04 said:
Jim your set up sounds like its making great power. I wouldn't imagined a 4.6 (N/A) making 355 none the less an auto. If you don't mind me asking roughly how much did the heads, cams, gaskets,ect cost, just parts not labor. I'm basically a mechanic for a living. I feel confident doing the wrench turning myself ( plus a few friends and beers give or take ) I'd leave the tuning to an expert though.

Burningrubber judging by your times sounds like you are right where I want to be also. I have a few questions though.

Are 410s to much gear for your car, is first even usefull with spray ?
Do you have harris's controller, if so how do you like it ?
If you don't mind how much did your set up cost ? I think I probably do a good kit for 1000-1500 dollars
Click to expand...

Just check out my online store. I have TF heads on sale for $1950 and my cams are on sale for $559. Also have head/cam combo packages as well to save a couple more bucks.
 
A

Arnolds97

New Member
Jan 22, 2004
103
0
0
Liberty, MO
Sep 5, 2010
#18
  • Sep 5, 2010
  • #18
Blower. Nuff Said. Vortech or ATI ProCharger.
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Sep 5, 2010
#19
  • Sep 5, 2010
  • #19
ChillPhatCat said:
Not really, power is power. If the internals can withstand 450 Hp, and you build a combination that makes 500 Hp with those internals, it's going to blow up just the same whether you used FI or an N/A build to do it.
Click to expand...

im gonna disagree there, the internals come apart at 400+hp on F/I engines because of added pressure from the added air/fuel. but a n/a engine with that same hp is because of the engines efficiancy to utilize the same fuel pressure as stock and un restricted air flow now, with the tf heads they use a smaller combustion chamber also, and larger intake valves for a less restrictive flow path. there is to a point added cylinder pressure but non as if there is from f/i. the heads bum compression to ~10.5:1-11:1 depending on grade of fuel used and higher with race fuel. with a s/c@9psi you compression jumps from a stock 9.5:1 to almost 12.5-13:1 ratio, thats why rods bend and break on stock bottom ends not from hp ratings at a given rpm. now i realize that there is a limit to these engines as far as rpm goes also. in conclusion when using FI you need more fuel for the added incoming air, but with n/a your utilizing and making the engine more efficiant to produce more hp. if it were me and my money id go n/a its safer, and i dont need more than 375hp on the street or a dd
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Sep 5, 2010
#20
  • Sep 5, 2010
  • #20
fast97gt said:
im gonna disagree there, the internals come apart at 400+hp on F/I engines because of added pressure from the added air/fuel. but a n/a engine with that same hp is because of the engines efficiancy to utilize the same fuel pressure as stock and un restricted air flow now, with the tf heads they use a smaller combustion chamber also, and larger intake valves for a less restrictive flow path. there is to a point added cylinder pressure but non as if there is from f/i. the heads bum compression to ~10.5:1-11:1 depending on grade of fuel used and higher with race fuel. with a s/c@9psi you compression jumps from a stock 9.5:1 to almost 12.5-13:1 ratio, thats why rods bend and break on stock bottom ends not from hp ratings at a given rpm. now i realize that there is a limit to these engines as far as rpm goes also. in conclusion when using FI you need more fuel for the added incoming air, but with n/a your utilizing and making the engine more efficiant to produce more hp. if it were me and my money id go n/a its safer, and i dont need more than 375hp on the street or a dd
Click to expand...

And 400+ Hp N/A engines come apart because of high RPM's. In the end it's generally a wash, and without significant data on the weaknesses of a specific engine, you can't make a call on what is safe"er" with reasonable certainty. If you stay a good safety of margin under the maximum hp rating on the internals, it shouldn't matter whether you use forced or natural aspiration.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

03 Gt battery issues while driving
  • ThatBlack4.6
  • Nov 17, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 1, 2023
Mustang5L5
Took some pics, i do really own a mustang...
  • 2000xp8
  • Jun 20, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 6 7 8
Replies
148
Views
19K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 1, 2024
Mustang5L5
D
1994 GT issues
  • DLB1985
  • Jul 2, 2022
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 2, 2022
General karthief
Stiffer front springs writeup from the old .net site
  • LILCBRA
  • Oct 24, 2022
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
1K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Oct 29, 2022
Enzio
Lower HP expected from 2002 mustang?
  • Exas1999
  • Mar 10, 2021
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 18, 2021
OneSick99GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?