• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

How does V.8 compare to V.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brian68GT
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
B

Brian68GT

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
90
0
0
Dublin, Ireland.
Apr 30, 2005
#1
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #1
I have just come back from a week long trip to L.A. Went rented a brand new V.6 Mustang with just 5k on the clock.

I drove the car a hell of a lot in the week as i'm geuinely interested in getting one of these.

But the V.6 was a collosal dissapointment. I wouldnt buy a V.6 anyway but i did expect it to have a bit of grunt. You can imagine my dissapointment to discover this 4.0 engine is nowhere near a quick as my 1.8T, 150bhp Audi A.6 or my 40 year old 302 GT Fatsback. Whats going on here, how can such a big, modern engine, with apparently 200bhp be so slow from standstill. Ok when you get it going its ok, but from the lights, it just has no pulling power.

So, V.8 owners, will the V.8 dissapoint or is there a significant difference in power?
 
D

delurker

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
169
0
0
Apr 30, 2005
#2
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #2
The GT can't get out of its own way.


OK, I'm just stirring the pot - I suggest you go to a dealer and test drive one, otherwise you'll get a bunch of subjective opinions, I suspect mostly from people who've only driven one or the other.
 
B

bsande1

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
1
0
0
Apr 30, 2005
#3
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #3
One of the problems with both the GT and the V6 is in the programming. This is the major cause of the initial lag you feel. It can be easily corrected with a reflash or chip.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Apr 30, 2005
#4
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #4
I don't think it's possible to compare a V6 to a V8 in my opinion...
 

'01SilverBullet

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
239
2
19
The City of Lost Angels, CA
Apr 30, 2005
#5
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #5
You cannot compare the performance of the V6 to the V8 at all.
 
B

Brian68GT

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
90
0
0
Dublin, Ireland.
Apr 30, 2005
#6
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #6
Of course you can compare them, havn't I already compared the V.6 to my 18.T Audi A6?

Now the difference between a V.6 Mustang and a V.8 Mustang is far less than a Mustang to an Audi.

Ok, so lets put it this way. Anyone out there who has driven BOTH a V.6 and a V.8, can you please describe how the driving experience differs?....

The V.6 lacks power when accellerating from stadstill, how is the V.8 from standstill?

The atuobox is slow to shift gear, how is autobox with the V.8?
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
Apr 30, 2005
#7
  • Apr 30, 2005
  • #7
The reason why its slow from a stop is because the rear gearing is made for good gas mileage on the highway. Change the gears and the car will pull out much faster. But NO 6 or 4 banger can compare with the torque a V8 produces.
 

merlinsteele

New Member
Nov 21, 2004
68
0
0
Oklahoma
May 1, 2005
#8
  • May 1, 2005
  • #8
I'm betting you drove an automatic? Maybe wrong. But I've driven both automatics and standards, and the standard felt a lot better. Maybe just my imagination.
 
2

2MFF-Z28

New Member
May 1, 2005
30
0
0
May 1, 2005
#9
  • May 1, 2005
  • #9
One has 200 hp and the other has 300 hp, I'd say thats a pretty big difference.
The GT runs real nice. The new GT will prob tear apar your old stang with no problem. Test drive one, I dont think you'll be let down



t
co owner/founder
2mff motorsports/fabshop
 
T

torri834

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
13
0
0
May 1, 2005
#10
  • May 1, 2005
  • #10
merlinsteele said:
I'm betting you drove an automatic? Maybe wrong. But I've driven both automatics and standards, and the standard felt a lot better. Maybe just my imagination.
Click to expand...

I feel the same way. I have test driven both v6 an v8 auto and sandard. The standard felt a lot better even in the v6.
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
May 1, 2005
#11
  • May 1, 2005
  • #11
Also keep in mind it was a RENTAL car. I'm sure they are aware that people want to flog these things to death and they probaby change parameters in the computer to make it even more "safe" (aka slow). I know I would if I was renting cars

We flash the computer to make it faster, they flash to make them slower
 

Openminds

New Member
Apr 9, 2005
9
0
0
May 1, 2005
#12
  • May 1, 2005
  • #12
gp001 said:
Also keep in mind it was a RENTAL car. I'm sure they are aware that people want to flog these things to death and they probaby change parameters in the computer to make it even more "safe" (aka slow). I know I would if I was renting cars

We flash the computer to make it faster, they flash to make them slower
Click to expand...

Having been involved with Fleet Sales in the past, I know for a fact that Ford offers this "Detune". If you ever buy one of these Fleet cars, a quick trip to the dealer to get it retuned will fix things. Ford offered this free of charge to new owners in the past, don't know what their policy is now-a-days.
 

celticstanger

Member
Dec 21, 2004
179
0
16
"Glen Ivy", CA
May 1, 2005
#13
  • May 1, 2005
  • #13
bsande1 said:
One of the problems with both the GT and the V6 is in the programming. This is the major cause of the initial lag you feel. It can be easily corrected with a reflash or chip.
Click to expand...
Just did my GT. You're 100% spot on. The car is like a rocket off the line.

Diablo Performance Tune.
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
May 1, 2005
#14
  • May 1, 2005
  • #14
2MFF-Z28 said:
One has 200 hp and the other has 300 hp, I'd say thats a pretty big difference.
The GT runs real nice. The new GT will prob tear apar your old stang with no problem. Test drive one, I dont think you'll be let down



t
co owner/founder
2mff motorsports/fabshop
Click to expand...

First off the V6 has 210hp.
I wouldnt go so far as to say "it will tear apart an old stang with no problem". Yes the new stang is faster but it wont destroy an older stang. The new stang weights alot more than the old one.
And its not the HP that makes your car quick, its the torque. Theres not much of a difference in the "peak" torque numbers.
 
D

delurker

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
169
0
0
May 1, 2005
#15
  • May 1, 2005
  • #15
tomabram said:
... The new stang weights alot more than the old one...
Click to expand...

Are you sure about this? Which old one?
 

sacha

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
84
0
0
May 1, 2005
#16
  • May 1, 2005
  • #16
tomabram said:
First off the V6 has 210hp.
I wouldnt go so far as to say "it will tear apart an old stang with no problem". Yes the new stang is faster but it wont destroy an older stang. The new stang weights alot more than the old one.
And its not the HP that makes your car quick, its the torque. Theres not much of a difference in the "peak" torque numbers.
Click to expand...

So are you actually suggesting an 05V6 is just as fast as the 05GT? I don't know about the rest of the people in this forum, but I'll put my GT up against any V6 out there.


I just wanna note that there are a lot of happy V6 owners out there and I think it's a great car. But if you want maximum performance, it's a simple answer - you go with a GT if it's in your budget.
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
May 1, 2005
#17
  • May 1, 2005
  • #17
sacha said:
So are you actually suggesting an 05V6 is just as fast as the 05GT? I don't know about the rest of the people in this forum, but I'll put my GT up against any V6 out there.
Click to expand...

WHERE DID I SAY THE V6 WAS AS FAST AS THE V8? SHOW ME!!!
 
T

tomabram

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
66
0
0
May 1, 2005
#18
  • May 1, 2005
  • #18
delurker said:
Are you sure about this? Which old one?
Click to expand...

Actually they are heavier then all the previous Mustangs. My Fox weights 3104 and the new GT premium is a very heavy 3506 (ford specs).
 
G

gp001

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2001
4,401
0
66
So. Cal.
May 1, 2005
#19
  • May 1, 2005
  • #19
tomabram said:
First off the V6 has 210hp.
I wouldnt go so far as to say "it will tear apart an old stang with no problem". Yes the new stang is faster but it wont destroy an older stang. The new stang weights alot more than the old one.
And its not the HP that makes your car quick, its the torque. Theres not much of a difference in the "peak" torque numbers.
Click to expand...

He is fully aware of the ins and outs of old stangs. He and I built my 66 from the ground up. The only thing that wasnt changed is the main section of the body (roof, quraters, deck lid). He has been to many Mustang events with me and has seen what "stock" old cars run and what "modified" old cars run. Unless he has modded the 68 GT fastback it will run mid 14s. My stock 05 GT ran low 14s.

http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history_50vs46.htm

He has also helped me with every modification to date on my 05 GT
 
D

delurker

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
169
0
0
May 1, 2005
#20
  • May 1, 2005
  • #20
tomabram said:
Actually they are heavier then all the previous Mustangs. My Fox weights 3104 and the new GT premium is a very heavy 3506 (ford specs).
Click to expand...

I just did some random searching. These are all curb weights:

05 GT: 3425 lbs
'67 Shelby: 3521 lbs
'65 Mustang: 2980 lbs, '68 Shelby 3665 lbs, '69 Mach 1 3571 lbs, '71 Boss 351: 3452 lbs, '72 (142 hp) Mustang, 3300 lbs
2002 Mustang GT, 3280 lbs
2003 Cobra, 3665 lbs
2004 Mach 1: 3469 lbs

Granted, several of these had bigger engines and/or superchargers, but it's simply not true that "the 05 is heavier than all the previous mustangs" - it's only 100-200 pounds heavier than the fox body mustangs.


Edit note: Wow, I never knew that tripod was a dirty word, but the long link is: http://members.tripod.com/fast_wheels/compar.htm
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Power Steering; The Engine Killing Vampire?
  • joetrainer31
  • Feb 18, 2014
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
9K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 19, 2014
joetrainer31
2012 gt 5.0 3:73 rear
  • Nazareth225
  • May 2, 2012
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
8
Views
3K
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Jul 13, 2012
Turbo810
The rematch (Or how I learned about nitrous....The hard way) only 1 left!
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 29, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2011
CarMichael Angelo
New TVS blower pulley from Carmen Goudey
  • DiMora
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
5K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jan 25, 2010
NastyStang113
P1131 code + where does this go? + pics! hotcobra03 help me maybe?
  • Night Shifter
  • Jul 7, 2009
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
5K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 12, 2009
Night Shifter
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?