• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

how is everyone running this setup???

  • Thread starter Thread starter FordStang
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 11, 2003
#1
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #1
Eldebrock performer intake 5.0, Eldebrock performer Heads*1.6 stud mounted rocker**, how do i go about the whole valve cover ordeal? Get Spacer or no spacer or what.......i did a search and found little info and i see so many people are running studed rockers so how do u get it to work??? Thanks
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 11, 2003
#2
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #2
you can use fox valve covers (with slight modification to the baffle) without an intake spacer. with just about anything else, a spacer of at least 1/2" will most likely be necessary.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 11, 2003
#3
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #3
is the spacer a good or bad thing though?? Also i heard if u remove the baffle oil will shoot out of the Valve cover ?????????
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 11, 2003
#4
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #4
FordStang said:
is the spacer a good or bad thing though?? Also i heard if u remove the baffle oil will shoot out of the Valve cover ?????????
Click to expand...

I'm running fox body vc's with Scorpion stud rr's on my AFR's.

I've got the baffle cut out and have had no problems that I know of.

I don't have a spacer also.

Later
Grady
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 11, 2003
#5
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #5
Could just use fox covers and remove the baffle and use a Regular cap and not a breather so it wont shoot oil out correct
 

TrueBlue95GT

Member
Sep 29, 2003
966
0
16
Connecticut
Dec 11, 2003
#6
  • Dec 11, 2003
  • #6
Final 5-0, do you use a breather system or do you use the stock hookup from the valve cover to the intake track? I have no baffle and I notice a large amount of oil leaking out of the breather.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#7
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #7
Well i think i figured it out....im going to just get the Pedastal monted heads instead of my stud mounted ones and use my factory covers and get them polished, then get some cobra 1.7 rockers to get more lift out of my cam and wont need any spacers or anything.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 12, 2003
#8
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #8
TrueBlue95GT said:
Final 5-0, do you use a breather system or do you use the stock hookup from the valve cover to the intake track? I have no baffle and I notice a large amount of oil leaking out of the breather.
Click to expand...

I do not use a breather

Later
Grady
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 12, 2003
#9
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #9
FordStang said:
Well i think i figured it out....im going to just get the Pedastal monted heads instead of my stud mounted ones and use my factory covers and get them polished, then get some cobra 1.7 rockers to get more lift out of my cam and wont need any spacers or anything.
Click to expand...

Whoa, you had stud mount rockers and now your going pedastal? Why go through the hassle of sending them back. It won't matter which kind of rocker you use. Your sending stuff back for no reason. The stock valve covers will have to be messaged to get them to work with either of those rockers. Oh, and why would oil shoot out the breather? Who is telling you to send stuff back and oil will shoot out the valve covers? None of theses questions make sense.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#10
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #10
not to much of a hassle returning the heads because i like only 30minutes from summit racing retail store and i get most of my stuff from there so i can just drive there which i did. And i believe the 1.7 cobra rockers which im getting were on the 94-95's and they used the same valve covers as my 94 GT did so i think it will be fine
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Dec 12, 2003
#11
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #11
gt and cobra VC's are not the same.. Im not sure how much taller they are. From what engine builders say, stud mount rockers are the way to go.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#12
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #12
lets see a pic of a 94-95 cobra engine with a close up of the valve cover then a pic of the Gt close up of a valve cover.......if i do return the heads again and go stud rockers offocurse they have more strength but dont really need it my car isnt going to be some race car just a quick street car........and like i was saying if i did return my heads again to get the stud ones i know a dude that can make me some custom valve covers that are awesome.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Dec 12, 2003
#13
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #13
u will notice right away the cobra VC's say cobra on them, do ur gt covers say that?

Ped rockers are bitch to settup compared to stud mounts, from my understanding.

If u know a dude who can make u VC's and u want to do that, then y did u start this discussion
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#14
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #14
just a question. if you werent going to take my advice at all, why did you keep me talking about this for an hour the other night?
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#15
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #15
u dont only get one persons opinion....isnt that what these boards are for???
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Dec 12, 2003
#16
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #16
FordStang

The stud rr's are not a prob with fox body vc's.

I use Scorpion rr's and they are larger than the Crane's and such. I think ANY street type stud rr will fit.

IMHO, you get more options with stud rr's.

I don't understand your thought process unless you just don't like the look(can't see em any way) of the fox vc's.

Later
Grady
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Dec 12, 2003
#17
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #17
just a question. if you werent going to take my advice at all, why did you keep me talking about this for an hour the other night?
Click to expand...

because he doesnt listen, and he knows everything.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#18
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #18
my thinking is why do i need to get studded rockers?? yea there stronger and all but why get different valve covers that are for the fox bodys or get spacers ect.....if its just a street car and not trying to get into the 11 or whatever why not just get bolts on pedastals??
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#19
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #19
FordStang said:
u dont only get one persons opinion....isnt that what these boards are for???
Click to expand...
well, when you are talking to me about something i have personally been through with not only my own, but 5 other cars, i would think that what im telling you would be enough. thats all.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 12, 2003
#20
  • Dec 12, 2003
  • #20
FordStang said:
my thinking is why do i need to get studded rockers?? yea there stronger and all but why get different valve covers that are for the fox bodys or get spacers ect.....if its just a street car and not trying to get into the 11 or whatever why not just get bolts on pedastals??
Click to expand...
if you think you are going to just drop the stock valve covers on top of some 1.7 pedestal mount rockers, it isnt going to happen. VibrantRedGT had to grind the ends of four of his rockers off to fit his stock covers over them (the 4 on the ends). as far as why i went stud mount, i only wanted to do it once. i didnt want to buy the pedestal mount, and need to upgrade later on down the road. i've learned my lesson with that kind of stuff and now prefer to do things right the first time around.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
919
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Sunday at 5:40 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
41
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sunday at 5:40 PM
AeroCoupe
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
875
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
842
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?