• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

How much camber is evil camber?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bloody Guts
  • Start date Start date Oct 6, 2005

Bloody Guts

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
23
0
0
Metro Detroit
Oct 6, 2005
#1
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #1
hey

I'll start by saying that i've already searched and reread all the old threads involving lowering springs and the camber adjustments. I still have some questions...

I installed the Eibach kit about 2 weeks ago, I got the car aligned today.... here were the numbers:

Front Camber:
Left -1.5º Right -1.4º
Rear Camber:
Left .1º Right .1º

Cross Camber:
-.1º

Front Toe:
Left -.03º Right .06º
Rear Toe:
Left .13º Right .07º


I don't know enough about the effects of camber to know what will be harmful. This is a daily driver with stock wheels and tires. I will be upgrading to 18" wheels and tires in the spring.

I know that negative camber can lead to better handling but more tire wear. Is it harmful to have negative camber in the front and not in the rear? I don't mind a little more tire wear if it will handle better and I don't have to purchase a camber adjustment kit.

My front camber numbers are only .2º and .1º off of the specified range, is this a big problem? I don't take the car to the track, probably never will. I just need someone to look at my situation and give me a more experienced opinion. I've tried to discern a solution from everyone else's situations, but it seems that a lot of factors are at work.

Thank you to anyone who can shed some light on what I should do.
 

Big-Foot

Member
Aug 20, 2005
123
2
18
Kenyon, MN
Oct 6, 2005
#2
  • Oct 6, 2005
  • #2
Anything more than -1.5* of camber on the front can lead to poorer braking and accelerated tire wear. Handling will also be affected on those surfaces that are less than glass smooth.
 
O

Owner1

Member
Apr 1, 2005
37
0
7
Carnation, WA
Oct 11, 2005
#3
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #3
Your alignment will be fine the way it is.

Negative camber is dialed in only to compensate for the camber change caused by cornering loads, and by the movement of the suspension.

Being a front engined, solid rear axle car, your rear tires do not need the camber compensation as the solid rear axle doesn't experience any significant camber change anyway. So your rear numbers look good.

For cars that are street driven only, I would use less than 1.5 degrees of negative camber in the front, as the increased grip from more negative camber is outweighed (for me) by the accelerated tire wear. Since it is rare to use 10/10 of the grip on the street anyway, you can probably afford to give up a small percentage of maximum grip.

I absolutely wouldn't sweat being a couple tenths off from the factory camber range, as production variances and alignment shop variances can easily be more than 2 tenths. In fact, unless you paid for a very high quality alignment, you could have it realigned at the same shop, or a different shop, and you probably would see more than 2 tenths variance.

On my old Fox body, I played with alignment settings all the time (my friend owned a shop) and over time I learned what matters and what doesn't.

Owner1
 

Bloody Guts

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
23
0
0
Metro Detroit
Oct 11, 2005
#4
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #4
Owner1 said:
Your alignment will be fine the way it is.

Negative camber is dialed in only to compensate for the camber change caused by cornering loads, and by the movement of the suspension.

Being a front engined, solid rear axle car, your rear tires do not need the camber compensation as the solid rear axle doesn't experience any significant camber change anyway. So your rear numbers look good.

For cars that are street driven only, I would use less than 1.5 degrees of negative camber in the front, as the increased grip from more negative camber is outweighed (for me) by the accelerated tire wear. Since it is rare to use 10/10 of the grip on the street anyway, you can probably afford to give up a small percentage of maximum grip.

I absolutely wouldn't sweat being a couple tenths off from the factory camber range, as production variances and alignment shop variances can easily be more than 2 tenths. In fact, unless you paid for a very high quality alignment, you could have it realigned at the same shop, or a different shop, and you probably would see more than 2 tenths variance.

On my old Fox body, I played with alignment settings all the time (my friend owned a shop) and over time I learned what matters and what doesn't.

Owner1
Click to expand...

thank you very much for the help, i'm happy someone was able to look at my whole situation and give me a rational explanation for all of this

it's hard to compare advice when people use their cars for such different things (autocross/drag/daily/etc)

i'm not going to worry about it yet, i've still got the stock rubber on there, i don't mind if they wear out a little faster, i might do something about it when i upgrade my wheels and tires

thanks again

j
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
437
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
J&M Products Launches New Knuckle to Toe Link Bearing Kits for 2015+ Ford Mustang IRS
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
169
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
114
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
305
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?