• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How much fuel is needed to produce approx 425?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan Gray
  • Start date Start date Nov 17, 2005

Dan Gray

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
93
0
6
Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Nov 17, 2005
#1
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #1
I have a 331 stroker motor in my 89 hatchback(can look at sig to see excatly what i have) that im running 115mph in the quarter. But since i built this engine last year i feel that it is running too lean. The plug colour at the end of the track is always too clean/white for me. If I play around with the fuel pressure at the track, the higher the pressure the more MPH i can pull out of the car until i hit about 60PSI fuel pressure. And even then i can only get a tan out of the plugs. I don't feel i should be having to run the fuel pressure that high and im thinking my injectors are too small or my fuel pump is too small. When i built this engine i was aiming for around 400-425 hp so i installed 30lbs injectors. Have i gone too small? SHould i have install 36lb. Im also running a 190lph pump. But at 60PSI fuel pressure am i getting enough fuel to feed the engine or should i step up to a 255lph?

Thanks
DAn
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Nov 17, 2005
#2
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #2
Have you had it dyno'd? The best way to determine if your running lean is to put it on a dyno with an a/f meter or buy your own wide band o2 so you can check it yourself. That way you know your exact air/fuel ratio instead of trying to tune by the seat of your pants, so to speak. 30lb injectors should be enough for your combo in my opinion, however going to a 255 pump might not be a bad idea.
 
M

Mike92GT

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
583
0
0
Florida
Nov 17, 2005
#3
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #3
I just realized your in Canada, my bad. I don't what you have in the way of chassis dynos up there...
 

Dan Gray

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
93
0
6
Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Nov 17, 2005
#4
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #4
WE have lots of chassis dyno's up here. Ya im going to do that this year.
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Nov 18, 2005
#5
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #5
Go with the 255. On my f/i 331 I ran 36 # injectors...but I also have victor Jr's and 11:1 compression
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,029
1,621
194
NJ
Nov 18, 2005
#6
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #6
I'll bet your C&L meter is the problem, because a 155 pump, with 30's will support 450 without running 60psi. (this is NA does not apply to a supercharged car)
I know these numbers as to be facts, not hearsay. Including one car with that exact fuel setup that made 444 to the wheels on a 347, and ran to about 6500 rpm. In a car that went 10.70@124 all natural.

Before everyone jumps down my throat about the C&L opinion, spare me, i know if you have one, you love it, and it's great, but this is a serious setup Dan has, not some mild 250 rwhp car.
They can definetely throw a cars fuel mixture off.
I suggest an 80mm Pro m. You can take the advice or you can leave it.
Dan, nothing personal with you here, but every time i make a detrimental comment about C&L everyone that owns one freaks out. My info is from more than reliable sources.

Now 36's won't hurt, nor will the bigger pump, i just don't think that's going to cure anything. People tend to judge fuel demand based on what they see with a supercharged car, and it's not nearly the same NA.

BTW, nice combo, you should be able to get 120mph+out of it, when it's pefected.
 

Dbeck002

New Member
Apr 30, 2005
710
0
0
South florida
Nov 18, 2005
#7
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #7
Personal experience with the C&L.

It gets the job done for a daily driven car, not for a racecar.

The brain of the engine is that MAF, get a pro-m 80mm universal. its expensive but it'll be your best investment.



I only make 302 RWHP 331 RWTQ with my stock bottom end and aftermarket heads/cam.

Even so, my dyno tuner told me to get rid of the C&L because its garbage. He swears by the PRO-M, he told me I could hit 315 RWHP no problem if I swapped just the MAF to the 80mm PRO-M. Do it before you do anything, then dyno tune your car. Then come back to us. Hope this helps.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Nov 18, 2005
#8
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #8
Dan Gray said:
I have a 331 stroker motor in my 89 hatchback(can look at sig to see excatly what i have) that im running 115mph in the quarter. But since i built this engine last year i feel that it is running too lean. The plug colour at the end of the track is always too clean/white for me. If I play around with the fuel pressure at the track, the higher the pressure the more MPH i can pull out of the car until i hit about 60PSI fuel pressure. And even then i can only get a tan out of the plugs. I don't feel i should be having to run the fuel pressure that high and im thinking my injectors are too small or my fuel pump is too small. When i built this engine i was aiming for around 400-425 hp so i installed 30lbs injectors. Have i gone too small? SHould i have install 36lb. Im also running a 190lph pump. But at 60PSI fuel pressure am i getting enough fuel to feed the engine or should i step up to a 255lph?

Thanks
DAn
Click to expand...

That pump and injector sizing should be about right (but you could go up to 42lb and still be at ~60% cycle with 40psi, I have an excel calculator or I can post up the formulas if anyone cares). If you are still getting lean at 60psi, I would look elsewhere for the problem. Something like bad O2s or ECT/ACT? As suggested your MAF could be causing some problems.
The above comments by 2000xp8 are not the only neg. things I have heard about C&L meters. However, I am running one w/ the stroker in my sig, and seem ok. There are many factors there.

I think the only way to really get any accuracy with the fuel ratio would be with a tuner or dyno session.
When you complete a pass do you shut the motor off at full throttle (or close to it)? From what I have read this will make a big difference in plug readings.
jason
 

Dan Gray

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
93
0
6
Coquitlam, BC, Canada
Nov 18, 2005
#9
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #9
Thanks everybody. I do run the C&L meter and at the time many years ago that i bought it, it made i huge difference over the Pro-m that i was running. But i too have hear many people complaining about the C&L meters. Its not a bad idea to look into it. And yes the real only way to tune this engine properly will to be on a dyno so i will have to look into that as well. Thanks again everyone. i will let you know how she works out!
Dan
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Nov 18, 2005
#10
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #10
i ran the c&l on my car for the longest time. when i got the sc and when to the dyno tuner he said to get rid of it and get an 80mm pro-m....so i did
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Fuel Erratic Fuel Pressure 1985 GT
  • DienstXIV
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
695
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 16, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
01 mustang 3.8 fuel pressure issue
  • Mhaley2006
  • May 29, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
163
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 29, 2026
Mhaley2006
M
B
Electrical Why does my fox body keep frying eecs
  • brandyn200
  • Jun 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
264
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Fuel Fuel Pressure Issue
  • justadude07
  • May 12, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
412
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 12, 2025
justadude07
J
1
Engine 91 mustang 302 Low acceleration car backfires pops and acts like it doesn’t want to take fuel
  • 1991Fox5.0
  • Oct 4, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
1991Fox5.0
1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?