• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

How much power can an 8" really take ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rusty67
  • Start date Start date May 6, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 6, 2007
#1
  • May 6, 2007
  • #1
I always like to build for the future because I hate having to spend money twice and do work twice. Should I bother beefing my 8" or just switch to a 9" and forget my 8" ? I'm planing to put out between 300-350hp to the wheels. I'm going to be puting a 351w into my 67 eventually and I'm considering turning it into a 393 stroker. I'm sure the 8" will be fine for the 302 I'm building at the moment but when I put the 351 in there I'm wondering if a built 8" will handle the abuse if I drive it every day or maybe 3 days a week.

I want to put a 3.55 in there with a posi and a nodular case. Maybe some 31 spline axles. Should I just step it up to a 9" ?
 
R

RUSTYNUT

New Member
Mar 22, 2007
128
0
0
PDX
May 6, 2007
#2
  • May 6, 2007
  • #2
How are you planning using the car? If you aren't launching at the drags with slicks your 8" should hold up well. Check out Curries sight, they have new pinion support for 8" that helps with one of the weak spots for $99.00. I had talked to currie a few years back and said 31 in a 8" was a waste because the carrier will break befor even quality 28 axles. If you do get 31's they will fit in a 9" of the same width. If you are going to buy all new parts I would do the 9". Not much of any differance in price and the you might get lucky and find some 31's in it already. Soon you will hear about how heavy a 9" is, but it's not as much as you would think. I have been looking at same problem and after alot research I'm looking for a 31 spline 9" as we speak. If you go with 9" you may want up grade drive shaft [ bigger u-joints] to make the swap worth it . Run what you got and shop for the new goodies as bucks allow.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
May 6, 2007
#3
  • May 6, 2007
  • #3
The Currie 8" will hold up just fine. Am seeing these do OK at track events.

If you are going to stay strictly street without too much playing around the standard 8" will be OK.

Most of the Ford rear ends are superior to others.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
May 6, 2007
#4
  • May 6, 2007
  • #4
There's only one reason for installing a stroker, and that's because you want to romp on it whenever possible. --You've got to, because the temptation is too great not to do it.

The weakest link in the 8-inch rear end is the area around the driving pinion.

The weakest link of a 9-inch (with 28-spline axles) is the axles (generally the left, [short], axle).


An 8-inch will live longer behind an automatic than it will a standard, but a nine inch rear end's life expectancy is much greater no matter what the transmission is. A nine inch with an N-case and 31-spline axles would be virtually bulletproof.

You'll hear all sorts of things about the 9-inch being 75-100 lbs. heavier than the 8-inch and...bla bla bla. That is not true: . In reality, for example, a '65/'66 Mustang 8-inch drum brake rear end weighs 170 lbs. A '57-'59 Ford big car 9-inch drum brake rear end (same width as '65/'66 Mustang 8-inch), weighs 194 lbs. --That's only a weight difference of 24 lbs. (or spread out, that's only 12 lbs. per side heavier).

1. http://ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=1

2. http://ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=2

3. http://ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=5

4. http://ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=9

5. http://ultrastang.com/Rearinfo.asp?Page_ID=16
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 6, 2007
#5
  • May 6, 2007
  • #5
I've got a stick in the car. I'll provably break my T5 well before the rear end if I get some stciky tires on the car.

I'm going to drag the car occasionally but that isn't my main goal with it. When this car is something you could call "finished" (which provably wont be for another 10 years or so) I'm going to want an all around car that I can take to an auto cross track or a drag stip and have fun with on occasion but still be able to drive between 3 and 7 days a week.

The cheapest I've seen a 3rd member for brand new is like 800 with everything I want except I can't seem to find anyone with a nodular case. A lot of builders are using aluminum. I'm just scared of that.

Ultrastang, I know what you mean about tempation... I love to get on my car but typically I drive somewhat conservatively.... somewhat.... ok who am I kidding I'm provably going to drive it like I stole it for the first year or more I get it on the road for every day use.
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
May 6, 2007
#6
  • May 6, 2007
  • #6
I had this same situation. For me this is what it came down to......

This car is going to get faster and faster with every build. period.

Eventualy, I'm probably going to break the 8" even if I put money into it.

And lastly, I will now have a broken rearend with hundreds of dollars into it.

IMO, keep the 8" until you break it, if you want to save money. Most of us here are just like you and on a tight budget.

If you are going to invest money into something, make it something you'll keep for a very looong time and will take the abuse of your future 351 turned stroker.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 6, 2007
#7
  • May 6, 2007
  • #7
That is kind of what I'm starting to think myself. The only issue for me really is geting a 9" assembly. I wonder if I can trade some of my home made beer for a 9" ?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
May 6, 2007
#8
  • May 6, 2007
  • #8
You can do what ol' Shelby did when there were no 9" rears for his Stangs...
Take a 9" housing center and weld your 8" tubes onto it and stick the 8" axles into a 28 spline chunk. That is how Shelby and HiPo 9" rears were made in 65-66.
That way all you need to do is find a non-disirable rear from a big car or truck and keep your axles, brakes, mounting points, etc... Some of the common rears can be found cheap or free. The only 9" rears that command high prices are those that are hard to find. This method doesn't require a specific rear.

Also, I have broken several 8" rears with 306 cubes.
I don't trust them.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 6, 2007
#9
  • May 6, 2007
  • #9
I'd rather just find a 9" that fits straight away with no foolin around. Looks like its time to research for hours on the ultrastang website as well as others....
 
9

96 DOHC Cobra

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2001
542
0
16
Cerritos, CA
May 6, 2007
#10
  • May 6, 2007
  • #10
ratio411 said:
I have broken several 8" rears with 306 cubes.
I don't trust them.
Click to expand...


I agree. I wouldn't leave an 8" behind most any V8. My brother used to have a 78 Granada with a 250ci straight six, C4 and an 8" rear. His wife drove it mostly, and the 8" didn't survive 30,000 miles.
I also agree if your long-term plans include a 393 stroker motor, don't waste money on the 8" rear. Save what $$ you can and build a sturdy 9" for your car.
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
May 7, 2007
#11
  • May 7, 2007
  • #11
ultra had it pretty much dead on. With an automatic, I have yet to see one break. With a stick, that would probably be another story.

There is a guy that comes to the shop I work at with a 66 falcon with a 8" with an auburn in it. Basic 306 with ported Gt40p heads, b-cam with 1.7s, RPM with a 650 holley. With the AOD it makes 250 or so to the tires and has gone some 8.20s-8.30s in the 1/8. On 150, it makes 370 and has been some 7.20s.

Mine only makes 270 on the motor to the tires with a c4 but it is coming out shortly for a t5. We shall see what happens . . .
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 7, 2007
#12
  • May 7, 2007
  • #12
So... uh.... anyone want to sell me a 9" that will fit my 67 ?
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
May 7, 2007
#13
  • May 7, 2007
  • #13
Currie or Strange will, but they don't fall into the cheap or free catagories.

Also consider an 8.8" out of a fox or newer mustang for a '67. they are about the same width i believe, you'd just need to grind off the suspension mounts and weld on some leaf spring perches. They aren't quite as strong as a 9", but they will handle plenty more power than an 8". They also have the advantage of being a little lighter than the 9" (i believe).

Personally, i went with a nine for my future engine, just tossing out the idea.
 

calpolymustang

Member
Feb 1, 2004
217
0
16
Santa Rosa, CA
May 7, 2007
#14
  • May 7, 2007
  • #14
While we're talking about breaking axles and rear ends...

How much of a beating can a 9" from a '77-'78 Versailles take? Lets assume an AOD is in front of it.
I know its only 28 spline and isnt as strong as a Currie, but its stronger than the 8".

I recently bought a complete one, emergency brakes and all. It has the 4-piston Trac-Loc and so I'm planning on re-gearing it and swapping to a u-joint yolk from a 69 Galaxy. I hope to eventually put the 9" in a '67 FE Fairlane/Comet.
 
B

BornInAFord

Member
Apr 22, 2005
199
0
17
Bend, OR 97701
May 8, 2007
#15
  • May 8, 2007
  • #15
96 DOHC Cobra said:
I agree. I wouldn't leave an 8" behind most any V8. My brother used to have a 78 Granada with a 250ci straight six, C4 and an 8" rear. His wife drove it mostly, and the 8" didn't survive 30,000 miles.
I also agree if your long-term plans include a 393 stroker motor, don't waste money on the 8" rear. Save what $$ you can and build a sturdy 9" for your car.
Click to expand...
And my 8" had 400,000 miles on it behind a 289 A code and 4 speed. I agree that the 8" isn't the strongest rear end on the planet, but honestly! You make it sound like all of us should ditch our 8" for the 9" ASAP. I mean, even the 8" three ribbed pre-67 castings have survived quite well behind some Mustangs making pretty good horsepower. As long as the 393 stroker doesn't put traction to the ground, the 8" should last quite a while. As will the T5. True, you can make a case he should start looking for an upgrade like the 9" with 31 splines, but for most of us the 8" will work great.

In your brother's case, perhaps the late castings (like most of the later 70s stuff, including the 302 blocks) aren't as good as the earlier ones. There may have been some other factors, too. A teenage son, perhaps?

As far as advice for Rusty67, I think there has been some very good suggestions so far. Build the stroker. Get a 9" ready while you build. Meanwhile, upgrade to the 3.55 8" for your 302 and sell the whole rear, housing and all, when you upgrade to the 9.
Daniel
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
May 8, 2007
#16
  • May 8, 2007
  • #16
I've got an 8" rear behind my 351w with a Tremec. I get on it a lot. 60,000 miles behind the 351 without any adverse effects.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
May 8, 2007
#17
  • May 8, 2007
  • #17
I know a (properly) build 8" can take just about anything a 302 will throw at it. People complain a lot about the 8" but its actually a good rear end. I know my 393 stroker is going to eat the 8" for a midnight snack and then come looking for more... at least the way I'm going to be driving it one I get it up and running. As for an 8.8 I've already decided against it. I don't like the way that rear end goes together. The gears comming out the back and not comming out in a pumpkin ? No thanx.

I'm not sure I even want to sink any money into my 8" at all. It would cost me like 800 bux for a decent carrier with a posi all brand new and I don't want to spend 400 bux having a carrier I buy for 150 dollars rebuild because that puts me at 650 and thats just too much. I think I'll just step up to a small bearing 9". Is there any reason to move up to the big bearing 9" ?
 
R

RUSTYNUT

New Member
Mar 22, 2007
128
0
0
PDX
May 8, 2007
#18
  • May 8, 2007
  • #18
You get larger[ stronger ] tapered bearings and the options for larger cheap brakes and the houseing is stronger but heavier. You can save some bucks buy not getting the n case and getting one already equiped with 31 axles. If you are driving on the street you would be hard pressed breaking a standard carrier.
 

67GTCOUPE

Founding Member
Dec 20, 2000
653
0
0
Land of Ice and Snow
May 8, 2007
#19
  • May 8, 2007
  • #19
I have a 67 with a 8" rear behind my toploader behind my 393 stroker which puts out north of 500hp at the flywheel.

I will eventually build a 9", but it is working for now.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
May 8, 2007
#20
  • May 8, 2007
  • #20
If you're on a budget you can get a used center section off of ebay. look for ones out of mid 70s broncos and trucks. some of them had the factory 31 spline trac-lok limited slip differential.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
246
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
141
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
562
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
824
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Progress Thread The Mach Returns - Update/build thread
  • squeak93
  • Feb 20, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
322
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?