• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

how much would nitto DRs help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peepeeskillz
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#1
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #1
my car has LTs and a sct 93 octane tune, and the best time ive been able to run is 13.9@101(g-tech) with a 2.2 60'. i have recently installed a set of sportlines and 4.10s now i cant do better than 14.5 lol. i have a set of 315/35-17 NT555rs that i havent had time to get mounted yet, do you guys think those would get me back into the 13s?!?
 

mustanggt04fast

Member
Mar 6, 2009
105
0
16
Jan 19, 2010
#2
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #2
hell yea they will help they will really improve your 60' times i run 245/45/17 nittos and i went from a 2.1 60' time to a best of a 1.75 with just the switch of the tires. that will keep you well in the 13's specially with the 4.10's
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#3
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #3
mustanggt04fast said:
hell yea they will help they will really improve your 60' times i run 245/45/17 nittos and i went from a 2.1 60' time to a best of a 1.75 with just the switch of the tires. that will keep you well in the 13's specially with the 4.10's
Click to expand...

thats want i wanted to hear! lol, i was really worried since my time dropped so much. 6 tenths seems like alot to gain from just a tire change but i hope you're right.
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Jan 19, 2010
#4
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #4
mustanggt04fast said:
hell yea they will help they will really improve your 60' times i run 245/45/17 nittos and i went from a 2.1 60' time to a best of a 1.75 with just the switch of the tires. that will keep you well in the 13's specially with the 4.10's
Click to expand...

+1 but what tires do you currently have on there now?
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#5
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #5
32ValveRom said:
+1 but what tires do you currently have on there now?
Click to expand...

i have 315/35-17 sumitomos lol
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jan 19, 2010
#6
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #6
I'm sure the tires will help, but in order to tell if the tires are the problem, you need to look at the 60's, not just the E.T. Weather could cause a huge difference in E.T.s. I'd be willing to bet that an identical car on a 45 degree low humidity day, versus a 95 degree high humidity day could be half a second or more difference.
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#7
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #7
sneaky98gt said:
I'm sure the tires will help, but in order to tell if the tires are the problem, you need to look at the 60's, not just the E.T. Weather could cause a huge difference in E.T.s. I'd be willing to bet that an identical car on a 45 degree low humidity day, versus a 95 degree high humidity day could be half a second or more difference.
Click to expand...

i was kinda thinking about that, but when i went 13.9 it was in the 70s, and on my 14.5 it was like 50-60, have no idea about the humidity though. also forgot to mention when i did the 13.9 my low fuel light was on, and when i did my last run i had about 5/8s of a tank, would that make a big difference?
 

sneaky98gt

10 Year Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,387
144
114
NC State University
Jan 19, 2010
#8
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #8
What were your 60' times?
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#9
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #9
on the 13.9 it was 2.235 and on the 14.5 it was like 2.4xx, but my 0-60 time dropped by like 7 tenths. i had traction problems in first and second, but on the 13.9 i had no tirespin whatsoever, im just kinda worried because my car doesnt seem too pull any harder in 2nd or 3rd with 4.10s maybe i just forgot what 3.27s felt like
 
N

ninjastang125

New Member
Nov 1, 2008
591
2
0
maryland
Jan 19, 2010
#10
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #10
Your car should run better in cooler weather but your not going anywhere off the line with your pedal to the floor spinning. With the nittos you should be able to get atleast a 1.9 60ft and get you back into the 13's. The reason it did worse is probably because you switched to 4.10s and stayed with street tires and need to adjust how you leave off the line. It takes time and practice and knowing what you car does. Lowering springs dont help you 60 ft time either.
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Jan 19, 2010
#11
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #11
if you drop the 2.4 to a 1.9 your ET will drop more than .5, Id guess et will drop .75, which would put you at a 13.75 at 101 or 102. work on your powershifts and should be able to rip a 13.25 at 102.
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#12
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #12
yea i think im going to need alottt of practice, especially to get a 13.25 lol. i cant wait to get these tires on!!
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 19, 2010
#13
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #13
@ believing what the g-tech says.

But yes, the tires should make a nice difference. Be sure to get them nice and hot. Unlike the other drag radials, you need a long smokey burnout.
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 19, 2010
#14
  • Jan 19, 2010
  • #14
bhuff30 said:
@ believing what the g-tech says.

But yes, the tires should make a nice difference. Be sure to get them nice and hot. Unlike the other drag radials, you need a long smokey burnout.
Click to expand...

lol yea ive heard alot of good things about them(g-tech), never been to a track before to really test it out though, but i want to

as for the tires, i cant wait to try them out. ive actually gotten a better 60' time according to my g-tech with my 245/45-17 kumho spt than the 315-35/17 sumitomo LOL
 
4

4tun8

New Member
May 1, 2006
172
0
0
Classified
Jan 20, 2010
#15
  • Jan 20, 2010
  • #15
I had one and it was not even close to accurate.
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 20, 2010
#16
  • Jan 20, 2010
  • #16
4tun8 said:
I had one and it was not even close to accurate.
Click to expand...

really?!? was it too fast, or too slow? or both?!?. also i heard if you dont shallow stage it wont be as accurate.
 

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jan 20, 2010
#17
  • Jan 20, 2010
  • #17
For each .10 you shave from your 60 foot, it will reduce your 1/4 mile ET by roughly .20. On my very first run at the track with the Nitto 555R's, I cut a 2.02 60 foot time (94 degrees, 90% humidity, I think the DA was something ridiculous like 5500) with an automatic transmission and no stall. Best so far is 1.92. With 4.10's and a nice long burnout - which these tires require - you should cut 1.7's all day long if you've got the driver mod.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jan 20, 2010
#18
  • Jan 20, 2010
  • #18
In my experience, the G-tech was just inaccurate and inconsistent. It was very sensitive to being zeroed on level ground. Then, if you had it zeroed well, it was inconsistent as you made the runs, either above or below and depending on slight slopes in the road. It always indicated ~2-3 mph fast for a 100mph car.

Besides those points, the surface at the track is much different from anything you'd find on the street. Certain roads can be much stickier than the street, particularly if it was just paved. It's just a whole 'nuther experience actually running at the track and making real passes. You are always slower at the track than you think you should be, until you get a whole lot of seat time and experience.
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Jan 22, 2010
#19
  • Jan 22, 2010
  • #19
lol im starting to think the g-tech is inconsistent too, but might also be my car too. i got the tires put on today. and the best i can do on the g-tech is 14.4@99 with a 2.226 60', i had the tire pressure dropped to like 16psi and there was no tirespin but my car seems to have lost some power, use to accelerate between 80-100 alot faster with 3.27s, maybe because the ratio of 4th and 4.10s is higher than 3.27s in 3rd. but my car has been throwing these same codes for a while now, codes having to do with fuel being lean on the left bank, and lack of signal from the o2 sensor, could this be part of my problem?
 

Tanus

New Member
Dec 11, 2009
847
1
0
A to the Z
Jan 22, 2010
#20
  • Jan 22, 2010
  • #20
car should feel much faster w/ the 4.10s, Id read the plugs to confirm the lean issue
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Turbo Foxbody Idle Help
  • AwxyMoron
  • May 5, 2021
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
13
Views
6K
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 6, 2021
AwxyMoron
A
S
2013 gt convertible with auto 3.15 -3.73 gear change
  • shipbuilder
  • Apr 9, 2018
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
3K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2018
shipbuilder
S
R
Engine 1992 Mustang Hesitation/Cutting-Out
  • RTW0223
  • May 2, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2025
Noobz347
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
T
600+hp Gear Ratio And Rpm Help
  • TomasV
  • Apr 10, 2016
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
4K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 11, 2016
TomasV
T
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?