• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

I Call BS...

  • Thread starter Thread starter DFG 5OH
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Feb 17, 2006
#21
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #21
He has 55# injectors.

470RWHP is around 550-575FWHP, so you were not too far off of the 625hp mark. Like I said, 625 is definitely a high number for that combo, but I would not be surprised if he was close to that, like within 75hp or so.
 

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Feb 17, 2006
#22
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #22
Low-5.0 said:
625hp sounds a little high for that intake/tb, but I don't think it's too far off. Here's my friends combo making 657RWHP.

347 8.5:1 compression
AFR 185 heads.
Ported lower SysteMaxII lower w/ Vortech/Saleen upper
1.6 scorpion rockers
S-trim (2.75 upper, 6.87 lower) 14#
1 3/4 BBK longtubes, 2.5" Dr.Gas X pipe, and 3 chamber delta flow flowmasters
SMC 'Superpump' methanol injection (straight methanol, no water mix)
PMS tuned.
Who built your friends bottom end? I'm looking to get around that number but my block is a hinderance to me.
Click to expand...
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Feb 17, 2006
#23
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #23
KBCobra95 said:
Who built your friends bottom end? I'm looking to get around that number but my block is a hinderance to me.
Click to expand...

I believe he had it built locally...Watson & Ruple I think is the name of the shop.
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Feb 17, 2006
#24
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #24
I see things a little differently I guess, If you have not had your car on the dyno.......or ran it at the track.....Then don't throw numbers out......
I get asked all the time about mine.....My answer....I have no Freagin' idea until I run it and put it on the dyno......."nuff said.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Feb 17, 2006
#25
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #25
drakesdad said:
I see things a little differently I guess, If you have not had your car on the dyno.......or ran it at the track.....Then don't throw numbers out......
I get asked all the time about mine.....My answer....I have no Freagin' idea until I run it and put it on the dyno......."nuff said.
Click to expand...

that is what i say as well.

625hp with a cobra intake--non turbo'd--would have to be some sort of record, would it not?
 

94MustangGT5.0

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
288
0
0
Champaign, Illinois
Feb 18, 2006
#26
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #26
Matt, are you sure the bottom end was only a "built 302" and not possibly a built 331 or 347? It seems odd that he would build a 302... most people freshen them up when building them to 306's, then throw in the stroker crank and you could possible see those numbers at the flywheel.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Feb 18, 2006
#27
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #27
well i doubt it had a stock block, its possible, but i would think that that would be one of the things i would tell someone if they were asking about my car...heads, intake, cam, block, and any power adder...he never mentioned it, although i forgot to ask...
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Feb 18, 2006
#28
  • Feb 18, 2006
  • #28
Hell, I'm still wondering about the Trickflow trackheat numbers 360/350 (I think I remember this) one stands for torque and one for HP . I would love to break into the 12's with my combo but would be happy with low 13's but I'm lost on what it will actually run. I do have plans on running it soon.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Feb 19, 2006
#29
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #29
At this rate alls he'd need is a T-trim to go 9s and a YS to go 8s

Its just that easy to run those times
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Feb 19, 2006
#30
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #30
Eades, are you talking about my mods?
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Feb 19, 2006
#31
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #31
If your the guy that runs 10.3s with the cobra (that this thread is about) then Yes I am
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Feb 19, 2006
#32
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #32
S#@t I wish, no that is not me............I'll be surprised if I break 13.5.......Of course I'm hoping to be surprised and get lower but I have to at least get 13.5 because that is what my brother's 2005 is at.....At least have to whip him.
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Feb 24, 2006
#33
  • Feb 24, 2006
  • #33
I made 625 on a T-Moss ported GT40 lower with a downs Ford upper and 75mm. OLD SKOOL
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Old H/c/i Installation Explanation And Pics
  • FastDriver
  • Jan 26, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 27, 2018
FastDriver
Crazy Overheating Problem. Need Help
  • GrapeApe318
  • Jul 17, 2013
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
11K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 15, 2020
Josh91lx
J
OK, anybody want a challenge? Problems...
  • 1987Rock
  • Apr 16, 2009
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
532
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 18, 2009
1987Rock
S
Overwhelmed with build HELP!
  • stanger1993
  • Aug 26, 2009
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
740
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 27, 2009
Shaolin Crane
S
Updated weight parts thread, fox & sn95 stuff, hoods, heads, shortblock, interior etc
  • Speeds8erM-1
  • Jul 16, 2009
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 5, 2015
FastDriver
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?