• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ideas on high ET at track

  • Thread starter Thread starter frcefedlx
  • Start date Start date Aug 25, 2005
F

frcefedlx

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
184
0
0
Aug 25, 2005
#1
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #1
I have everything in sig. and ran a best ET of 14.137 at 108mph. 60 ft was a crappy 2.354. I must point out that I am using a stock clutch with 118+ thousand miles on it and Kumho Ecsta 711 street radials. My buddies Cobra was running 13.1's at 110mph with 2.1 60' times on Eagle F1's. The Miles per hour are there but The ET's are not. Could this be the stock clutch is not up to the task or a combination of that and the lame tires. I just wanted to see what it would do and although I expected my crappy driving skills to play a part figured it would run quicker and alittle faster. My buddies cobra made 413rwhp and torque was 390 or something. Just looking for some ideas. This was my first ever trip to the 1\4 mile so any input would be appreciated
 

Daniel50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
716
1
0
Discovery Bay, CA
Aug 25, 2005
#2
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #2
your mile an hour is there which is the good news. your engine is running good. with a 2.0 sixty foot your times would be good for a mid 13 and with some stickies a low 13. yes your clutch needs to be upgraded but it also may be saving your tranny. oooh wait you got a blower too. then no you mile an hour isnt there lol. you should do that with no blower....
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 25, 2005
#3
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #3
@ 108 mph you are a bonefide 12 second car with some traction....no doubt. I don't think you have it dialed in because we have similar combo's and I run mid 12's on radials....I also make 11-12lbs of boost but thats another thread. Anyway with your mods you should be running well into the 13's on radials without the blower! 118,000 isn't a whole lot of miles for your engine either......
 
F

frcefedlx

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
184
0
0
Aug 25, 2005
#4
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #4
I agree 118,000 on the motor is not bad however I am still running the clutch ford put in the car and I am not sure what that clutch was even rated at. It drives fine around town but could it be slipping that bad or just not holding the power very well through out the rpms
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 25, 2005
#5
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #5
That clutch isn't enough for the amount of power that you are making but you would feel it slipping if it was bad enough to effect your ET. Replace it.
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Aug 25, 2005
#6
  • Aug 25, 2005
  • #6
Suggest if you think the clutch is tired that you change it before it dies. You should be able to pull some 1.9 or better sixty foots out of the car easily. Next up would be some stickier tires. And practice, practice. Add some drive it like a rental, and you should see some improvement.
 
D

davs5.0

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
921
0
0
windsor,ontario,canada
Aug 26, 2005
#7
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #7
I run 12.50's with that MPH. You need some tires for sure and some suspension wouldn't hurt either. With good tires your clutch will probably give up the ghost pretty quickly. Upgrade both the clutch and tires to get the most of all that money you spent on the motor.
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 26, 2005
#8
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #8
....I didn't think anything of it before but Daniel5.0 made a good point. Without changing a thing you have .5 or .6 sitting on the table already. You should be able to get your 60ft's down closer to 2.0, even on the worst set of tires ever made. You need to practice a bit.
 

allballsmustang

Member
Mar 31, 2005
174
0
16
Lehigh Valley, PA
Aug 26, 2005
#9
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #9
frcefedlx said:
I have everything in sig. and ran a best ET of 14.137 at 108mph. 60 ft was a crappy 2.354. I must point out that I am using a stock clutch with 118+ thousand miles on it and Kumho Ecsta 711 street radials. My buddies Cobra was running 13.1's at 110mph with 2.1 60' times on Eagle F1's. The Miles per hour are there but The ET's are not. Could this be the stock clutch is not up to the task or a combination of that and the lame tires. I just wanted to see what it would do and although I expected my crappy driving skills to play a part figured it would run quicker and alittle faster. My buddies cobra made 413rwhp and torque was 390 or something. Just looking for some ideas. This was my first ever trip to the 1\4 mile so any input would be appreciated
Click to expand...

Well id say that 99% of your problem is your tires...you have way too much horsepower according to your sig for those tires to hook up properly...id get yourself a spare set of rims with some slicks on em...you should be in the low 13's definately...
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 26, 2005
#10
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #10
On slicks if low 13's are all that car can run he may as well drive it off a bridge. With 393rwhp @ 3400 lbs (with him in it) that car is mid to low 11 second capable. If his MPH is already 108, which translates well into the 12's with traction, his MPH would likely increase on slicks as well. Making that 393hp work is another story altogether but he' s undoubtedly already a mid 12 second car, or less, with traction.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Aug 26, 2005
#11
  • Aug 26, 2005
  • #11
All you need is a better 60 foot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Took my '94 Cobra autocross car to the drag strip
  • Killercanary
  • Sep 17, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 9, 2009
Killercanary
gonna run it at the track tonight if rain permits
  • billfisher
  • May 26, 2009
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
632
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2009
billfisher
Late Introductions
  • caribe94
  • Dec 13, 2009
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
992
The Welcome Wagon Dec 13, 2009
Celeb
C
dissapointing track night
  • ceracer33
  • Jul 20, 2008
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
602
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2008
BannonJr
B
MPH high, 1/4 mile slow :(
  • jimdrechsler
  • Mar 18, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 19, 2007
jimdrechsler
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?