• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Ignition Timing with RPM cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJCarbine
  • Start date Start date Apr 29, 2007
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Apr 29, 2007
#1
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #1
Finally got my 289 all sorted out with a new edelbrock carb, performer RPM cam, and gt40p heads. The only issue left is that of ignition timing. The car seems to run fine at around 14* initial, but there is 0 power from idle which is expected with this cam. However, if I advance the initial to something like 20*, the low end is a lot stronger and the car seems to pull great. The added initial timing also smoothes out the idle, and I put the vacuum advance on manifold, which gives it a lot of initial timing at idle.

How much timing is too much? I've gotten this car started with 40* initial and it ran ok. I always use premium, and the engine is a C code so I think the compression is a little less than the hotter variety 289's.

Whatever the dizzy mechanical advance is on (13L) should give me another 26 degrees of timing, for a total of around 46 total. Car seems to run fine up to 5500 rpm, no detonation or pinging or anything

The harmonic balancer is new, the cam was installed so that the timing marks on the gears lined up, and the distributor is a remanufactured 289 stock replacement with a Pertronix drop in and coil.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Apr 29, 2007
#2
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #2
Move the vaccum advance to ported vacuum. Set the initial to 12 degrees BTDC. If that doesn't work, something is amiss. Like the balancer has slipped. What intake do you have on it?
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Apr 29, 2007
#3
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #3
Well, one frame of mind is that you can run whatever provides the most power without detonation, starting or overheating issues. Seems like you may have found that.

Caveat: Probably you shouldn't run manifold vacuum to the vacuum advance. With performance cams, quite often when you put it in gear or let out the clutch (ie: create a load), the rpms drop, causing vacuum to drop, retarding the timing at the very time you don't want to. It would probably be better to re-curve so you have more initial advance mechanically.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Apr 29, 2007
#4
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #4
I ran 14 initial with 34 or 36 as my total timing. The last time I had it dynoed, the operator felt I had to much total advance...but I didn't mess with it at that time so who knows. 20 initial & 46 degrees total seems like a lot of timing. IMO take it to a dyno shop spend the $150 for an hour of tuning- it will take all the guess work out of it.

With that cam my 289 was never a torque monster down low, but once you got past 3000rpm the power came on the car would pull real hard and I used to shift just a tick past 6000rpm.
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Apr 29, 2007
#5
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #5
For now I have the stock manifolds and a performer 289 intake manifold. Getting gt40p headers and a performer RPM manifold in the mail soon. Poor college student, butt dyno is all I can afford now. I will run timing in several different places and see which seems correct till I can get it dyno tuned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
94
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
454
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
206
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
558
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?