• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

I'M LOST!!! 1994 Mustang GT help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang1994
  • Start date Start date May 1, 2009
M

mustang1994

Member
Apr 19, 2009
58
0
6
May 1, 2009
#1
  • May 1, 2009
  • #1
First off I added 24lbs to my stang cause my 19lbs busted, and I had free 24lbs. So the car is running HORRIBLE!!! Won't keep an idle, backfires, runs sluggish, won't run like a stang should.

SO! this is what I did. I put new spark plugs, new wires, new coil, new cap and rotor, tried messing with the timing, put a new IAC, new TPS, added a NEW stange 2 chip to let the computer read it's getting 24lbs injectors, new cold air intake, reset the computer, put 2 new universal O2 sensors, and still BAFFLED!!! HELP!!!
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 1, 2009
#2
  • May 1, 2009
  • #2
Your mass air meter and your injectors now do not match. Your mass air is programed for #19's and the ECU still thinks there are #19's in the car.
 
M

mustang1994

Member
Apr 19, 2009
58
0
6
May 1, 2009
#3
  • May 1, 2009
  • #3
The chip fixed that, the guy who programmed to tell the computer I have 24lbs', said I must have the MAF stock.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
May 1, 2009
#4
  • May 1, 2009
  • #4
Is your EGR stuck open?

What codes do you get?
 
M

mustang1994

Member
Apr 19, 2009
58
0
6
May 1, 2009
#5
  • May 1, 2009
  • #5
HISSIN50 said:
Is your EGR stuck open?

What codes do you get?
Click to expand...

Oh I got a new EGR valve, but get my new computer scanner soon. Hope someone had a clue.
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
May 1, 2009
#6
  • May 1, 2009
  • #6
where did you get this "stage 2 chip" from??? and how much did it cost you? Doesn't sound legit to me....but I could be wrong. Did you check ALL your vacuum connections?
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 1, 2009
#7
  • May 1, 2009
  • #7
This stage 2 chip is suspect, IMO. What was "busted" about the 19lb injectors?
 
M

mustang1994

Member
Apr 19, 2009
58
0
6
May 1, 2009
#8
  • May 1, 2009
  • #8
Wouldnt fire up
 
S

sledge42hammer

New Member
May 1, 2009
11
0
0
brighton, co
May 1, 2009
#9
  • May 1, 2009
  • #9
+1 on the chip sounding like BS. and you need to replace MAF. its cheap and easy. if your going to fix it. do it right.
 

Stanger007

Founding Member
Sep 26, 2001
2,015
2
46
Baton Rouge, LA
May 2, 2009
#10
  • May 2, 2009
  • #10
Pull those codes and see what is going on there - something is definitely not right to be running that badly.

How does it run with the chip off?

Wes
 

Black95GT_Kid

Member
May 3, 2005
57
1
8
Cochranville PA
May 2, 2009
#11
  • May 2, 2009
  • #11
Ive never heard of tuning the ECU to compensate for the MAF and working properly. I would start with a new MAF, and go from there.
 

79'293stang

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
505
11
29
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
May 2, 2009
#12
  • May 2, 2009
  • #12
From my understanding, all the MAF's are the same between the v6 through the Cobra. Cobra runs 24s on the same maf. Ford as far as I know tunes the ecu for the different injectors. I am sure there is someone who will back me up on this since there are about a hundred posts arguing this fact!
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 2, 2009
#13
  • May 2, 2009
  • #13
79'293stang said:
From my understanding, all the MAF's are the same between the v6 through the Cobra. Cobra runs 24s on the same maf. Ford as far as I know tunes the ecu for the different injectors. I am sure there is someone who will back me up on this since there are about a hundred posts arguing this fact!
Click to expand...

You're correct on how Ford tuned the EEC for the injectors.

mustang1994 - Did you swap out the 19's for 24's because the car wouldn't fire, and that's how the assumption that the injectors were bad was made? I ask because this post was a bit vague and I'm hoping we can find you the answer you need:

mustang1994 said:
Wouldnt fire up
Click to expand...
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
May 2, 2009
#14
  • May 2, 2009
  • #14
Black95GT_Kid said:
Ive never heard of tuning the ECU to compensate for the MAF and working properly. I would start with a new MAF, and go from there.
Click to expand...

Are you kidding? In this case we could NEVER get the Lightning MAF's to work on our cars! And even if he does get the correct MAF, in this day and age getting one that's spot on isn't guaranteed. Thus, we have to get them "fine tuned" to play nice with our injectors!
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
May 3, 2009
#15
  • May 3, 2009
  • #15
He kinda skipped my questions too.....that chip still sounds shady to me
 

99FiveOh

15 Year Member
May 20, 2006
2,051
20
99
J-Ville, FL
May 3, 2009
#16
  • May 3, 2009
  • #16
It seems as though the bigger the injector the more tuning issues you have with "matching" MAF's. 24lbers and a nice Pro M should work well together. My .02
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
May 3, 2009
#17
  • May 3, 2009
  • #17
The_Mustang said:
It seems as though the bigger the injector the more tuning issues you have with "matching" MAF's. 24lbers and a nice Pro M should work well together. My .02
Click to expand...

The reason is really simple if you look at the big picture

The whole idea of a meter that reports false airflow readings to the pcm
so one can use larger sized injectors is so inferior to tuning by adjusting
the pcm parameters.

Two things become quickly apparent with using that method with the
intent of avoiding a tune of the pcm

1) Your load factors get all hosed up
and
Unlike the older Fox pcms which are RPM based

Our 94-95 pcms are LOAD based
so
If your load is not accurate

The pcm can't deliver the correct amount of fuel and spark

2) At low pulse width driving conditions, (idle & cruise) larger sized injectors
deliver too much fuel which can easily be corrected by optimizing the pcm.

Of course ... When one trys to use the cheat method of the meter reporting
false airflow to the pcm and no tune is in place, you end up being too rich
at idle and cruise

A meter caled for 24's is not gonna be accurate
but
The amount of inaccuracy isn't enough to make things unbearable

Well ... most of the time

Bottom line here is .....

For our Stangs ... the load needs to be accurate :Word:
and
If the meter is outta whack because one got larger injectors
well
You stand a good chance of dealing with drivability issues

Thats the thing about a tune

You can get all that inaccurate junk in the pcm back in proper perspective
so it works with ... NOT ... against all your hot rod parts

Grady
 

shttygtstang

New Member
Jun 2, 2004
978
0
0
May 7, 2009
#18
  • May 7, 2009
  • #18
Well its pretty ovious as i see your injectores were fine . Pull em out along with the chip and find the real problem .
Ide see what fuel preusure is at the intake the make sure your Fpr is ok.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
334
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
639
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
254
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?