• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

INTAKE and CAM combo....

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6FIVE_STANG
  • Start date Start date Jul 9, 2006

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#1
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #1
i have a 65 289 and want to get a new intake which will probably be the EDEL. AIRGAP but i dont know what cam to get for it. i want my car to be a daily driver but will LOTS of power. i dont know ANYTHING about cams so you guys have to be very speceific or just post a link of where i can buy it...
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Jul 9, 2006
#2
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #2
Get the Edelbrock cam that is engineered and dyno matched to work with that intake. (but I am not a fan of their carbs) The perf rpm in your case.

They do make a good int/cam combo...

and their carbs are ok, for those who dont know how to tune a Deamon / Holley / BG / anything else..... I guess.

Dave-
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jul 9, 2006
#3
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #3
If the car is going to be a daily driver, I'd recommend using a dual-plane manifold (Edelbrock's Performer RPM is a great street intake) and using either a matching Edelbrock cam, or Comp Cams' Extreme Energy cam, #XE268H. My experience with the Comp Cams stick is that it has a good-sounding idle, lots of torque and when used with a dual plane manifold and a 600cfm Holley (model #1850) it easily gets 20mpg. When shopping for a manifold, be aware that lots of modern, open-plenum, air-gap small block intakes have larger ports than the older-style heads. They'll bolt on, but may not work as well as you'd like due to the port mismatch.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 9, 2006
#4
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #4
Unless you're going to pull the heads and have screw in studs and guide plates put in them, Go with a cam no larger than the Performer cam(.448/.472 lift--204/214 duration) This cam will work even with the RPM intake, don't let anyone tell you different. Go with any bigger cam over .500 lift and 220 duration @ .050 and you'll start popping the studs out of your heads. It'll be a good idea to change your valve springs to new ones that match that cam, although it'll be fine with stock springs, the stockers are likely worn out.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jul 9, 2006
#5
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #5
Hearne's right, and that's a good example of having the right combination to get the most out a cam. Stabbing a bigger cam in a motor with sacked valvesprings and press-in studs won't cut it. Trust me, I learned that lesson the hard way...
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Jul 9, 2006
#6
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #6
Agree with Hearne, although I would like to add that their is a different level of flexibility between cams and intakes. I have run the RPM intakes on basically stock motors and they have worked fine. The RPM cam, while maybe matched to the RPM intakes maximum potential, is not a very good daily driver for a 289/302 Ford. It's a bit too aggressive, especially with a stock TC and heads. It's vacuum at idle is only 10-12.

The Performer cam would be a better choice.

Also, many factors come into play when selecting a cam, such as rear gear ratio, torque converter stall, heads, etc. All the good cam mfg's have toll free numbers to help you decide.
 

6FIVE_STANG

New Member
Jul 2, 2006
142
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jul 9, 2006
#7
  • Jul 9, 2006
  • #7
Ok, well im going to buy a intake and cam soon but i dont know the diffrence between the EDEL. RPM intake and the EDEL. RPM AIR GAP intake...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 10, 2006
#8
  • Jul 10, 2006
  • #8
Go to Edelbrocks website and look at the pics of the two. You'll see why it's called an air gap intake. If you don't see the difference..............................
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine Gt40p vs 180 procomp
  • Kleinjj27
  • Oct 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
409
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 3, 2026
Kleinjj27
K
M
  • Poll Poll
Stroking a Mexico 289 or newer roller 302
  • MaryJaneTheMustang
  • Aug 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
149
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2026
Bullitt347
Resolved 1999 cobra removed lower intake manifold to crossovertube
  • hvcobra99
  • Sep 6, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
0
Views
159
SVT Tech Forum Sep 6, 2026
hvcobra99
J
Transmission
  • Jraesims
  • Mar 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
233
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
JD1964
S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
196
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?