• Mustang Forums
  • Special Production

Mach 1 Intake Flow Comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcVIII
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2004

MarcVIII

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
32
0
0
Cleveland / Akron, Ohio
Dec 10, 2004
#1
  • Dec 10, 2004
  • #1
I have an aluminum block 4.6L DOHC. I want to do a custom hidden twinturbo set-up, I was wondering if the Mach 1 Ram Air intake outflowed the NA 99 Cobra intake? I really like the shaker and ram air that the Mach 1 motor does. Or should I go aftermarket if I can find one (Don't know of one for the DOHC motor)? I'm looking to spend about $6k - $8k on the motor plus tuning. I already have turbos.
 
G

GaPonyFarm

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
663
0
0
Columbus, GA
Dec 12, 2004
#2
  • Dec 12, 2004
  • #2
I don't think you'll suffer any degradation from using the Mach intake. I would also recommend using the PHP intake spacer, which raises the upper intake another 3/8" inch.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Dec 14, 2004
#3
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #3
As far as the CAI intake is concerned, from throttle body to fender they are essentially the same but the Mach has a little extra cool air to the filter via the Ram Air set up. Though, the Ram Air part of the intake is really more for show, people have seen decent gaines by making the intake non function and goin with just a JLT CAI/RAI setup. I kept my functional though, mostly for looks and coolness factor.

I'm not sure other then that what is different between the '99 and Mach as far as intake manifolds go.
 

MarcVIII

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
32
0
0
Cleveland / Akron, Ohio
Dec 15, 2004
#4
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #4
If I were to raise it up using the PHP intake spacer or 2, like GaPonyFarm said, it would actually work. I've seen this problem before, my 69 Buick is a Ram Air car, but the inlets are to low to be effective because the wind really doesn't flow in that area. But if you were to raise the scoop itself maybe an inch, you should see noticable gains from rammed induction. If I remember corectly, you'd have to have the scoop at least 1.75 inches above the seated surface (hood) to have any sort of functionality. 3" tall scoops on Stage 2 Buicks (VERY RARE, only 75) were functional as well as Mailbox hoodscoops on 442 (but they were seated closer to the front withless wind lift). I just thought it would be cool to utilize the ram air, but it seems for right now it needs a little more aftermarket research and products to be a huge HP addition. But they still look dead sexy.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Dec 15, 2004
#5
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #5
Well the scoop itself does work but the fact that the air goes down to the airbox and then back up to the TB limits the "RAM AIR" effect itself, but it does definitly draw air in form the shaker scoop, I know that for a fact.

The intake spacer works more because it increase the length of the intake runners on the intake manifold, not so much because it raises the shaker scoop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
506
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
213
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
466
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
650
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • Special Production
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?