• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Intake manifold spacer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trefty
  • Start date Start date Jul 30, 2005
T

Trefty

Member
Aug 13, 2004
117
0
16
Jul 30, 2005
#1
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #1
How well do they work and where is a good place to get one? Thanks.
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Jul 30, 2005
#2
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #2
they work pretty well. i can bare hand my upper manifold just a few minutes after shutting the car down. the thicker the spacer, the higher up in the rpm band it will move power.
summit is a good place to get one
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Jul 30, 2005
#3
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #3
luckythirteen13 said:
the thicker the spacer, the higher up in the rpm band it will move power.
Click to expand...

Perhaps my physics is a bit rusty, but doesn't a thicker spacer (which creates slightly longer runners) equal more power down low and shorter runners (like the box type intakes) equal more power in the higer RPM band?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 30, 2005
#4
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #4
18mustangs said:
Perhaps my physics is a bit rusty, but doesn't a thicker spacer (which creates slightly longer runners) equal more power down low and shorter runners (like the box type intakes) equal more power in the higer RPM band?
Click to expand...



I didn't seem to get any power out of mine. I used it on the stock 302 with 1.7RR, Cobra Intake, and a chip.

Never did dyno it though, so hp/$ could be reasonable?
 
T

Trefty

Member
Aug 13, 2004
117
0
16
Jul 30, 2005
#5
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #5
I'm looking at getting a spacer for the purposes of having enough room between the mainfold and my valve covers, so any added power is purely a bonus. Do the kits include everything that is needed?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 30, 2005
#6
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #6
Trefty said:
I'm looking at getting a spacer for the purposes of having enough room between the mainfold and my valve covers, so any added power is purely a bonus. Do the kits include everything that is needed?
Click to expand...

Double check when you order, but it should come with gaskets and bolts.
 

68torino

New Member
Jul 24, 2005
16
0
0
SD
Jul 30, 2005
#7
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #7
As I've read longer runners mean more torgue or bottom end. Short runners are for top end.
 

diddylx50

New Member
Apr 7, 2003
157
0
0
Jul 30, 2005
#8
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #8
I've also wondered if they work or not also. Im thinking about putting one on my car to see if it lowers the air intake temps...
 
L

luckythirteen13

New Member
Jul 19, 2005
648
0
0
Anaheim, CA
Jul 30, 2005
#9
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #9
ive been pretty dislexic (sp?) this week so you may be right. i know for a fact that it will move the powerband. i bought mine for the sole purpose of clearing tall valve covers. it came with bolts and gaskets. two of the bolts were too short so i had to go to the local hardware store for a couple of longer ones
 

z9_87

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
332
0
0
Urbana, IL
Jul 30, 2005
#10
  • Jul 30, 2005
  • #10
Yeah lowers the powerband a tad. They're not exenisive so a couple of extra horses makes it good hp/$ I also need one for Intake to valve cover clearance.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 31, 2005
#11
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #11
z9_87 said:
Yeah lowers the powerband a tad. They're not exenisive so a couple of extra horses makes it good hp/$ I also need one for Intake to valve cover clearance.
Click to expand...

You and Trefty both mention needing extra clearance with the manifold. I am confused as to why you have a clearance problem in the first place. I assume hood clearance will not be an issue, if you are currently not clear of the valve cover. What are your combos?
 

z9_87

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
332
0
0
Urbana, IL
Jul 31, 2005
#12
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #12
Well I put the sn95 cobra upper on my car for hood clearance issues(it's shorter) but then it's so low that a little valve looking thing (don't know the name) on the bottom of it puts a hole in my valve cover over time as it wears on it. Needed the extra 1/2", but not the 3" the 86-93cobra/gt-40 gives.

As for the other guy, I'm going to guess he just has tall valve covers. Don't the 351's have much taller valve covers?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jul 31, 2005
#13
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #13
z9_87 said:
Well I put the sn95 cobra upper on my car for hood clearance issues(it's shorter) but then it's so low that a little valve looking thing (don't know the name) on the bottom of it puts a hole in my valve cover over time as it wears on it. Needed the extra 1/2", but not the 3" the 86-93cobra/gt-40 gives.

As for the other guy, I'm going to guess he just has tall valve covers. Don't the 351's have much taller valve covers?
Click to expand...

I have the 351w in mine and it uses the same valve covers as the 302. He could be using taller covers for rocker clearance?

I did not realize there was a 3" height difference between the sn95 and the 93 Cobra manifold. Is the difference just in the upper intake?
 

z9_87

New Member
Apr 16, 2004
332
0
0
Urbana, IL
Jul 31, 2005
#14
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #14
yes just in the upper, I'm actualy using a 98 explorer lower and a 95 cobra upper because it ended up being cheaper that way.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Jul 31, 2005
#15
  • Jul 31, 2005
  • #15
I have a 1" spacer on my gt-40. my peak power on the dyno came at 5300 rpms. I was wondering if i should remove the spacer now that i have a supercharger on. Maybe try to move the peak power up in the rpm range a little to make better use of the boost. Any opinions on weather it will help.
 
J

jaackal

New Member
May 12, 2003
402
0
0
NJ
Aug 1, 2005
#16
  • Aug 1, 2005
  • #16
luckythirteen13 said:
ive been pretty dislexic (sp?) this week so you may be right. i know for a fact that it will move the powerband. i bought mine for the sole purpose of clearing tall valve covers. it came with bolts and gaskets. two of the bolts were too short so i had to go to the local hardware store for a couple of longer ones
Click to expand...


This happened to be, but NONE of the hardware stores locally or home depot or anyone had the bolts, i belive they needed to be 7 inches long and they only went up to 6, so i went to boltdepot.com to get the bolts, so if you run into any problem with bolt sizes go there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Retorque lower intake manifold bolts
  • 91GTstroked
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
287
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
Noobz347
D
Throttle Body Spacer
  • dropteeth
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
195
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 2, 2025
nicholase
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
320
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine EGR spacer for explorer 65mm TB?
  • 91GTstroked
  • Dec 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
380
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2024
Noobz347
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
505
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?