• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Intake Manifold

  • Thread starter Thread starter White95V6
  • Start date Start date Sep 9, 2004

White95V6

New Member
Dec 21, 2002
215
0
0
Hackettstown, NJ
Sep 9, 2004
#1
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #1
I want to get a Intake Manifold. I was looking at the Edelbrock Performer and Performer RPM. I know I can put the performer on the stock engine. What about the RPM, do I need to go with a aftermarket cam? I dont want a rough idle cam, can I just throw on a RPM, and not have problems. Thanks
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Sep 9, 2004
#2
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #2
ill sell u my Performer less then 1000 miles on it if ur interested?
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Sep 9, 2004
#3
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #3
the RPM will bolt right on too. The only thing you MIGHT notice is a little less lowend power and a little more top end power over the Performer 5.0 with the RPM. You dont need a cam yet... wait until you get some new heads for your car to get a new cam.
 

White95V6

New Member
Dec 21, 2002
215
0
0
Hackettstown, NJ
Sep 9, 2004
#4
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #4
Ford Stang got pictures of it? Anything wrong, condition? Price? Email me at black95gt@v8stangs.com
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 9, 2004
#5
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #5
In your case, definitely go with the regular performer and not the RPM. The stock heads and cam will work much better with it than the RPM contrary to recent discussions on here. The RPM should be run on a car that is geared and cammed for it and a stocker is not.
 

Mrgreen94gt

SIMMA DA NA!!!
Founding Member
Jul 16, 2002
448
0
0
West TN
Sep 9, 2004
#6
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #6


Personally, I wouldn't use the RPM unless I had a stroker.
 

FordStang

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
862
1
0
Orange Park, FL
Sep 9, 2004
#7
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #7
u have an email.
 

ARed1995GT

New Member
Dec 9, 2003
401
0
0
Boca Raton, FL
Sep 10, 2004
#8
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #8
well i can tell u from first hand experience, i went from stock intake to performer rpm... big big notice in low-end torque/power, but a significant notice in top end power.. really pulls, only problem is we redline at 5800 and our cam makes power to like 5400... rpm pulls to 6500, its definitely overkill, go with the performer 5.0, that is what i will be switching too very soon, also note that i was planning on doing the 5.0 but due to some stuff happening the rpm went on meanwhile
 

Piston

Founding Member
Aug 1, 2001
215
0
0
Chicago Suburbs
Sep 10, 2004
#9
  • Sep 10, 2004
  • #9
Been in your boat. First thing to realize is where you are going with your car. However, I don't see any reason for the RPM at all in your situation. In fact a street driven car likes yours would benefit greatly with all the extra TQ the performer will give you. However, if the next thing your buying and shortly will be Heads and Cam(higher reving cam)and you want to take the stock short block into higher RPM's then RPM might be fine. However, I strongly urge you to get the Performer and that will make you most happy. Honestly you don't want to rev that stock block too much past 6 and the performer is ideal for that. Once you add heads and cam to that performer you will have lots of low end torque and you will love it. Trust me and the others telling you to get the Performer.
 

White95V6

New Member
Dec 21, 2002
215
0
0
Hackettstown, NJ
Sep 12, 2004
#10
  • Sep 12, 2004
  • #10
I just bought FordStangs' Performer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine New factory manifold no start
  • Fishnchips
  • Oct 15, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
327
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 22, 2026
DadLife0724
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
696
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
B
Fuel 1990 installing edelBrock intake
  • Beaker
  • Oct 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
303
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2026
Noobz347
P
Vacuum
  • ProTechAutoServices
  • Aug 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
295
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 2, 2026
Noobz347
Resolved 1999 cobra removed lower intake manifold to crossovertube
  • hvcobra99
  • Sep 6, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
0
Views
152
SVT Tech Forum Sep 6, 2026
hvcobra99
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?