• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Intake ,plenum ,Throttle Body Combos?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superstang01
  • Start date Start date Oct 15, 2006

superstang01

Active Member
Oct 11, 2006
448
9
29
Kingston, On, Canada
Oct 15, 2006
#1
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #1
hey ,
I am considering doing all the parts listed in the tittle of the thread. I am just wondering if there is any good combos to use and what pieces give you the most power and looks. If there coudl be some links thrown in that woudl also be great.
Thanks :SNSign:
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Oct 15, 2006
#2
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #2
If you mean like a cold air intake or something, save your money and just buy a drop in K&N filter. It will offer the same performance for alot less $, unless you want the look of a new CAI. If you really want one, BBK or MAC are cheap, but JLT gets alot of praise.

As far as a plenum and throttle body combo, Accufab is known to be the best quality wise, and squeeze every last ounce of gains from the combo (which isnt a ton by the way)... however, they are very expensive. You can get an RPM Outlet (which is a C&L copy) plenum with a BBK throttle body for $245... good deal right there.
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Oct 15, 2006
#3
  • Oct 15, 2006
  • #3
I don't know if I agree with Accufab as the best quality. I know of quite a few Accufab 75mm TB and upper intake combos whistling. I know my BBK 75mm TB and C&L upper intake does not and I know of a few others with the same as me, that do not either.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Oct 16, 2006
#4
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #4
My accufab is dead quiet. It's the best tb/plenum combo i've seen yet.

And my plenum is possibly for sale too.
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Oct 16, 2006
#5
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #5
m0dular depot has a link with dyno results showing Accufab plenum/TB to be the highest gainers on that particular vehicle, when compared against several others.
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Oct 16, 2006
#6
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #6
I would go with the cheapest setup. Because most all combo's produced about the same amount of HP gains. And why pay $400 for an Accufab setup when you can get the same setup for half that price? If you spend more than $200 for the plenum/tb, your getting ripped. I'd rather put that money toward gears or something more productive.
 
F

FalconGuy016

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
437
1
0
Northern VA
Oct 16, 2006
#7
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #7
sgarlic said:
************.com has a link with dyno results showing Accufab plenum/TB to be the highest gainers on that particular vehicle, when compared against several others.
Click to expand...

************ has two tech articles comparing, on the dyno, four different tb/pl combinations in both 70mm and 75mm. The accufab combo always came up on top, always (this is consistant with numberous other dyno tests, though less documented and less technically precise). It costs more, but if you're going to do it, might as well do it right. By the way, 70mm combo actually produced more horsepower and torque across the band and is said to be more beneficial than the 75mm unless you have some power adder. At that point though, it's not even too important.

I believe the Accufab combo is $365 shipped on MustangTuning.com.

Quality is top notch as well.

As for CAI, www.tunableinduction.com supposedly has the best gains out there. Gains are minimal though. Stay away from MAC I hear, as it leans out the engine.

Errr, are we not allowed to say M0DULARDEPOT ? It's another website on the internet that offers different services and opinions. Why the hell not. This better not be some childish filtering bull****.
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Oct 16, 2006
#8
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #8
professional products are not bad for the price get 75MM tb and the plenum
 
T

TGJ

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,049
4
0
Oct 16, 2006
#9
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #9
Both Plenum shootouts on MD used only Accufab TB's. A C&L plenum made 1HP less than the Accufab and is how much less? For 1HP is it really worth buying the Accufab?

And as I said earlier, Accufab's are common to whistle. The thread linked is from MD.

http://forums.************.com/showthread.php?t=19599&highlight=throttle+body

I wouldn't really call those shootout's very precise either. To many unknown variables between dyno-runs to really accurately tell how much of a difference between each one. I am not going to get involved with a debate here.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Oct 16, 2006
#10
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #10
I happen to like, but don't own the BBK plenum and tb combo that splits the diff between the accufab and the El cheapos in price. Under hood looks is a consideration for me as well and there again I like the BBK setup, although the blingage of the Accufab look excellent as well. Well, either a chip or the plenum/TB combo will end up next on my stang.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Oct 16, 2006
#11
  • Oct 16, 2006
  • #11
i had the accufab 70mm setup, but like already said, stick with the stock intake tube unless you need the bling. my car consistently trapped 1.5-2.0mph quicker with that tb and plenum
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
248
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
S
Throttle body
  • ShredThePred
  • Nov 1, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
223
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 2, 2024
89ripper
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
575
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?