• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

is a 100 shot safe on my motor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98COBRA281
  • Start date Start date Mar 1, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Mar 1, 2009
#1
  • Mar 1, 2009
  • #1
right now im making 310rwhp, hoping to be about 320ish when fine tuned, and im going to be spraying it very soon, i have a zex wet kit, and im wanting to spray a 100 shot, but i worried about it because i have stock pistons, so the 100 shot will put me about 420ish rwhp, and 450ish rwtq, and it will be getting a nitrous dyno tune, so will it be safe on the 100, or should i just stay with the 75 shot?
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Mar 2, 2009
#2
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #2
98COBRA281 said:
right now im making 310rwhp, hoping to be about 320ish when fine tuned, and im going to be spraying it very soon, i have a zex wet kit, and im wanting to spray a 100 shot, but i worried about it because i have stock pistons, so the 100 shot will put me about 420ish rwhp, and 450ish rwtq, and it will be getting a nitrous dyno tune, so will it be safe on the 100, or should i just stay with the 75 shot?
Click to expand...


There is no real "good" answer to your question....I wouldn't do it...you are really starting to push it on the stock internals...I know others may say it is safe...but I wouldn't do it...not after you had all that other work done...

Get some PI Heads and some forged internals and put a blower on it...then you will be around 500 rwhp....

I know it is a lot more cash to do that...but it will be even more if you overdo it with the nitrous..
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 2, 2009
#3
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #3
Always work your way up slowly. Start with a 50 shot, then a 75, carefully checking the plugs for signs of detonation and of course the AF ratio. Then, if everything is clean pull a degree or 2 of timing and try the 100 shot.

I wouldn't worry too much about the bottom end falling apart from 'too much power'. There are plenty of people running more rwhp than that using a supercharger, and the supercharger sucks an extra 50+hp. That's an extra 50+ hp that the engine is making already, but is sucked away from the crank. If they were making power using a turbo or nitrous, their safe limit would be higher. Think back to the 60s when engines were rated at gross horsepower, and remember it is gross horsepower you should be worried about and not rwhp. No blower robbing 50+hp for you.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 2, 2009
#4
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #4
Lets get a few things straight. A 100 HP shot will give you 100 HP at the flywheel not the rear wheels. A 100 HP shot will give you 150 increase in torque at 3500 RPM and 131 at 4000 RPM at the flywheel. In other words the lower you start the nitrous the higher the torque increase.

Computer simulation of stock engine with 100 HP shot
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Mar 2, 2009
#5
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #5
Good call on the crank vs rwhp...totally missed that!

Nice graph too BTW...that is good info there!
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Mar 2, 2009
#6
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #6
bhuff30 said:
Always work your way up slowly. Start with a 50 shot, then a 75, carefully checking the plugs for signs of detonation and of course the AF ratio. Then, if everything is clean pull a degree or 2 of timing and try the 100 shot.

I wouldn't worry too much about the bottom end falling apart from 'too much power'. There are plenty of people running more rwhp than that using a supercharger, and the supercharger sucks an extra 50+hp. That's an extra 50+ hp that the engine is making already, but is sucked away from the crank. If they were making power using a turbo or nitrous, their safe limit would be higher. Think back to the 60s when engines were rated at gross horsepower, and remember it is gross horsepower you should be worried about and not rwhp. No blower robbing 50+hp for you.
Click to expand...

I AM NOT GOING TO SPRAY IT UNTILL ITS ON THE DYNO!!, the firts time the car will be sprayed it will be on the dyno, so we will be watching everthing like afr, detonation ect....
 

parrish5o

New Member
Dec 22, 2008
2
0
0
Dirty South
Mar 2, 2009
#7
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #7
You should be safe with a 100hp shot.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 2, 2009
#8
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #8
Most companies rate the nitrous shot at the rear wheels. In actuality, the gain at the crank is very close to the gain at the wheels. Consider 2 identical GT mustangs, one is NA making 225hp at the crank and another is supercharged making 450hp at the crank, with the exact same drivetrain. If the drivetrain losses are 35hp on the NA car, you might think it is 70hp on the blown car... This is not the case at all. There are losses due to friction, viscosity of the fluid and several other sources. A large portion of the losses are present, no matter how much power is going through the drivetrain. In reality, if the NA car is loosing 35hp in the drivetrain, given the same drivetrain, the supercharged car may be loosing only 40-45hp in drivetrain losses. Again, most of the losses are present no matter what the load is.

So, if you add a 100 shot, you likely only loose 5hp of the 100 you added to drivetrain losses. It is no where near the 15-25% you commonly see as overall losses. This is why no matter who makes the kit, the gains on a nitrous shot will be very close to the gains you see at the rear wheels.


98stangv8 said:
Good call on the crank vs rwhp...totally missed that!

Nice graph too BTW...that is good info there!
Click to expand...
 

98stangv8

Active Member
Oct 3, 2003
1,036
0
36
fayetteville, nc
Mar 2, 2009
#9
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #9
bhuff30 said:
Most companies rate the nitrous shot at the rear wheels. In actuality, the gain at the crank is very close to the gain at the wheels. Consider 2 identical GT mustangs, one is NA making 225hp at the crank and another is supercharged making 450hp at the crank, with the exact same drivetrain. If the drivetrain losses are 35hp on the NA car, you might think it is 70hp on the blown car... This is not the case at all. There are losses due to friction, viscosity of the fluid and several other sources. A large portion of the losses are present, no matter how much power is going through the drivetrain. In reality, if the NA car is loosing 35hp in the drivetrain, given the same drivetrain, the supercharged car may be loosing only 40-45hp in drivetrain losses. Again, most of the losses are present no matter what the load is.

So, if you add a 100 shot, you likely only loose 5hp of the 100 you added to drivetrain losses. It is no where near the 15-25% you commonly see as overall losses. This is why no matter who makes the kit, the gains on a nitrous shot will be very close to the gains you see at the rear wheels.
Click to expand...


we have already covered this:

http://forums.stangnet.com/772004-rwhp-loss-through-drivetrain.html
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 2, 2009
#10
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #10
Wow, thanks. That thread said a LOT of NOTHING. There was no conclusion and barely any factual data.

Yes, you can think of the drivetrain losses as being a percentage of the power you make. If you keep the same drivetrain and increase the power, then the percentage loss goes down. There are certain losses that are present no matter what the load is... and no, doubling the load does NOT double the total losses.

Again, if the drivetrain losses with a 225hp engine are 35hp, then the losses with a 450hp engine are NOT 70hp (the same percentage). It is something between 35 and 70hp. Really, this is absolutely true and proven in engineering gearing text books and show by MM&FF. I clearly remember reading and article stating that a T5 transmission has about 30hp of losses, no matter how much power you are making. Yes, more power means more losses, but the percentage of losses goes down.

98stangv8 said:
we have already covered this:

http://forums.stangnet.com/772004-rwhp-loss-through-drivetrain.html
Click to expand...
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Mar 2, 2009
#11
  • Mar 2, 2009
  • #11
^ i toltally agree witht you, so a 1000 crank hp car will loose 130-150hp throught the drivetrain? thats just
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Mar 3, 2009
#12
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #12
98COBRA281 said:
^ i toltally agree witht you, so a 1000 crank hp car will loose 130-150hp throught the drivetrain? thats just
Click to expand...

rightO bippy, d/t loss is the same no matter what. the percentage conspericy that was used can only apply to na engines. as far as being safe yes it is with a good tune, but not if you are going to use the nitrous everytime you crank the car up and go some where. its designed for racing and bragging rights so to answer your question only relies on how much youll use it.
 

Stan Weiss

Member
Dec 8, 2006
347
2
16
Philadelphia, PA
Mar 3, 2009
#13
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #13
bhuff30 said:
Wow, thanks. That thread said a LOT of NOTHING. There was no conclusion and barely any factual data.

Yes, you can think of the drivetrain losses as being a percentage of the power you make. If you keep the same drivetrain and increase the power, then the percentage loss goes down. There are certain losses that are present no matter what the load is... and no, doubling the load does NOT double the total losses.
Click to expand...

All I have seen posted so far is hearsay and no factual data. How about some links?

bhuff30 said:
Again, if the drivetrain losses with a 225hp engine are 35hp, then the losses with a 450hp engine are NOT 70hp (the same percentage). It is something between 35 and 70hp. Really, this is absolutely true and proven in engineering gearing text books and show by MM&FF. I clearly remember reading and article stating that a T5 transmission has about 30hp of losses, no matter how much power you are making. Yes, more power means more losses, but the percentage of losses goes down.
Click to expand...
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 3, 2009
#14
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #14
I spent a while making a long reply with more information and examples, but I'm not going to post it. I don't want to further drive the thread off topic. You can do as I did long ago and pull out some mechanical engineering textbooks and journals and look for this kind of information. My only point is, that quite a few of the losses are parasitic, and present no matter what the load is. It takes a minimum amount of power to turn a drivetrain at 60mph without any load, just because of frictional losses, pumping losses and losses of the gears meshing. The only additionals loads are from the extra frictional resistance on the bearings and gears to keep everything streight and true when power is applied.
 

32ValveRom

Member
Feb 15, 2009
328
0
17
Fl
Mar 3, 2009
#15
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #15
I'm thinking you should be safe with the 100 shot as long as you have the tune. But like, one of your replies if i were you I'd get the PI heads before i got into nitrous.
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Mar 3, 2009
#16
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #16
32ValveRom said:
I'm thinking you should be safe with the 100 shot as long as you have the tune. But like, one of your replies if i were you I'd get the PI heads before i got into nitrous.
Click to expand...

why pi heads?, i make more power them most pi swapped cars, and have the same compression as pi swapped motors, if i were to put pi heads on my car id probably lose power..............
 
R

roundboy

Member
Jun 9, 2005
30
0
6
houston
Mar 3, 2009
#17
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #17
I was making 310rwhp with a head, cams stock bottom end 2v pi motor.. I put a wet kit 100 shot on it and made 403 rwhp on the n2o tune.. the motor will be fine if tuned right.. i have a all motor tune and a n2o tune..
 

fast97gt

Active Member
Jan 2, 2007
1,082
2
49
north carolina
Mar 3, 2009
#18
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #18
roundboy said:
I was making 310rwhp with a head, cams stock bottom end 2v pi motor.. I put a wet kit 100 shot on it and made 403 rwhp on the n2o tune.. the motor will be fine if tuned right.. i have a all motor tune and a n2o tune..
Click to expand...

not to be a smarty but its no2
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Mar 3, 2009
#19
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #19
roundboy said:
I was making 310rwhp with a head, cams stock bottom end 2v pi motor.. I put a wet kit 100 shot on it and made 403 rwhp on the n2o tune.. the motor will be fine if tuned right.. i have a all motor tune and a n2o tune..
Click to expand...

yes, i will have 2 tunes also...
 
R

roundboy

Member
Jun 9, 2005
30
0
6
houston
Mar 3, 2009
#20
  • Mar 3, 2009
  • #20
fast97gt said:
not to be a smarty but its no2
Click to expand...

NO n2o is right!!!
Nitrous oxide, commonly known as "laughing gas", is a chemical compound with the chemical formula N2O.

Nitrous oxide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

What in gods green earth happend to my N/A 2.3?
  • Piranahbite
  • Mar 24, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 1, 2024
Piranahbite
S
Are 30LB injectors good for 300-350WHP?
  • Stangg338
  • Oct 4, 2021
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 4, 2021
Stangg338
S
My 93 4v Fox
  • OffspringChaos
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2024
bird_dog0347
A
Electrical Help Me, Help My Fox ! 1990 Wiring Assistance please ?
  • Anewjer00
  • Jan 8, 2022
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 8, 2022
evintho
M
2002 Gt Fuel cell mod question
  • MPN737
  • Aug 11, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 15, 2020
MPN737
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?