• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Is everyone running premium (92 octane minimum) fuel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter praugue
  • Start date Start date Nov 29, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Nov 29, 2007
#41
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #41
bloopbloob said:
what all can change where the timing should be? does degreeing a cam affect this? what about any mods? (besides f/i etc that need less timing)?
Click to expand...

any sort of forced induction such as turbo, supercharger, n2o, etc affects where you should set your timing. yes degreeing a cam does affect timing. any n/a car should be fine anywhere from 10* to 15*, some can go a bit higher depending on condition of the motor, any mods, etc.
 

fastford91

New Member
Aug 15, 2006
254
1
0
Niagara ,Ontario, Canada
Nov 29, 2007
#42
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #42
SUNOCO ULTRA 94 or Aviation fuel!! but its expensive!
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Nov 29, 2007
#43
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #43
MustangOwner said:
I ran 89 with 14 degrees timing, but it might make a difference that ALL gas in my state is atleast 15% ethanol. Soon i'll be running E85. That stuff is saweet.
Click to expand...

It's only sweet if you have the compression to support it. By compression, I meing either high n/a compression or some type of forced induction. Ethenol itself is a less effecient fuel than gasoline. You will typically need around 30% more fuel in order to support the same horsepower as gasoline...and you'll need to add tons of timing in an attempt to get back to the gasoline power levels.

Don't get me wrong, it's great for certain applications...but it's not a miracle fuel.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 29, 2007
#44
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #44
NikwoaC said:
I find that hard to believe. There are some schools of thought that anything over 18 is bad for a regularly driven car, even with premium (91+). tho, like someone said before, ethanol blends are common in fuels today, so maybe the fuel you use has some ethanol in it (effectively increasing the octane rating)? Do you regularly use additives like Sea Foam?

I'm not trying to call you out or anything, but 18-20 degrees seems like it could almost be counter-productive. Keep in mind the EEC-IV will compensate for some amount of knock by retarding the ignition.Anyway, beautiful car man.
Click to expand...

That is not true. The eec iv has no knock sensor so it can not retard timing based on knock. I wish it did. It would make it easier to tune for boost.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Nov 29, 2007
#45
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #45
strtrcr50 said:
That is not true. The eec iv has no knock sensor so it can not retard timing based on knock. I wish it did. It would make it easier to tune for boost.
Click to expand...

Wow, you're right. I read in the infamous "The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & Performance Handbook" that the EEC-IV compensates for knock, but I was just looking at a wiring diagram and it seems the 5.0 doesn't have a knock sensor after all.

Which confuses me. Is the information in TOFM5.0TR&PH incorrect or is there another way to detect or predict engine knock with the sensors the EEC-IV uses?

So is the spark map on a stock EEC-IV "dumb" and stays constant aside from initial advance? Obviously it has different operations for different conditions (part-throttle, WOT, deceleration, start-up, etc) but will the computer make changes to the original spark map with changes in environmental factors or modifications to the engine?

This is getting into a tuning conversation- who can fill me in on this?
 

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Nov 29, 2007
#46
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #46
timing at 14, I run 89. My car dosent like 87 but 93 is overkill
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Nov 29, 2007
#47
  • Nov 29, 2007
  • #47
Mustang5L5 said:
87 octane here in both my 5.0 and 2003 GT


Why?

It's cheaper, and burns more efficiently anyway.

Higher octane is not "better" anyway. It's a huge myth. Different engine setups require different octane levels depending on timing, boost, tune, etc. But having a octane number that is high does not signify "higher performance".
Click to expand...


Exactly. You should be using the lowest octane you can without detonation. More efficient and less emissions.
 

strtrcr50

New Member
Jun 21, 2006
0
4
0
Previously from Dirty Jerzey exit 7a
Nov 30, 2007
#48
  • Nov 30, 2007
  • #48
NikwoaC said:
Wow, you're right. I read in the infamous "The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & Performance Handbook" that the EEC-IV compensates for knock, but I was just looking at a wiring diagram and it seems the 5.0 doesn't have a knock sensor after all.

Which confuses me. Is the information in TOFM5.0TR&PH incorrect or is there another way to detect or predict engine knock with the sensors the EEC-IV uses?

So is the spark map on a stock EEC-IV "dumb" and stays constant aside from initial advance? Obviously it has different operations for different conditions (part-throttle, WOT, deceleration, start-up, etc) but will the computer make changes to the original spark map with changes in environmental factors or modifications to the engine?

This is getting into a tuning conversation- who can fill me in on this?
Click to expand...
I can fill you in to a degree. It's easier if you can see what the eec uses.
Download BinaryEditor by Clint Garratty and you can see every table that the eec uses for timing. There is spark control in both functions and tables. There are quite a few, but none are knock based. Mostly rpm, load, temp, etc..
Click here for BinaryEditor
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Nov 30, 2007
#49
  • Nov 30, 2007
  • #49
fastford91 said:
SUNOCO ULTRA 94 or Aviation fuel!! but its expensive!
Click to expand...

I run 93 or 94 Octane in my 92 with the Timing set at 14, it does not like 89 Octane. I would not run AVGAS in the Mustang it has a different Vapor Pressure and will not make your car run better.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Nov 30, 2007
#50
  • Nov 30, 2007
  • #50
Premium here is 93 octane, I use it and set my timing around 14*. I use the good stuff and could care less if it cost me $4 more to fill me tank, I don't drive the car enough to really be worried about it.
 

talladam

Member
Apr 3, 2007
50
0
6
Monroeville OH
Nov 30, 2007
#51
  • Nov 30, 2007
  • #51
There isn't any way for the ecm to retard timing as there is no knock sensor on our cars, 87-93's.

Adam
 
P

praugue

New Member
Sep 18, 2007
26
0
0
Dec 1, 2007
#52
  • Dec 1, 2007
  • #52
praugue said:
Yeah, I have pushed the timing ahead a bit. I hand-tune until it runs the way I want it. It's probably about 15 degrees ahead or so. I'll have to check, but I do like the way they run on 92, and with advanced timing, much better.
Click to expand...
FYI -

A quick check looks like I am at about 15° advanced. I am also at sea level to about 600 feet elevation.
 

Redeemedsoul

New Member
Sep 4, 2005
70
0
0
Dec 2, 2007
#53
  • Dec 2, 2007
  • #53
Running 94 (sunoco) on all my vehicles.
-rS
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
P
Engine 1988 CA mass air GT hesitation 3000rpm and higher
  • Png1978
  • May 10, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2018
Mustang5L5
No Spark With Spout Out And Fuel Pump Running Constantly
  • Christian Cornwell
  • Jul 21, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 23, 2017
jrichker
1
92 Gt Rough Idle On Cold Starts (long)
  • 1barzx3
  • Aug 2, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 28, 2021
Mstng93SSP
Excellent Hagerty Article About The "kings Of The Street"
  • FoxMustangLvr
  • Sep 21, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2017
NIKwoaC
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?