• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Is it a 289 or 302? (2nd try to post)

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangbuilder66
  • Start date Start date Dec 15, 2004
S

stangbuilder66

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
25
0
0
Dec 15, 2004
#1
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #1
Sorry if this is a DUP post, the first try gave me a server error.

Hey guys, I am not sure if my mustang has a 289 or 302 in it. Can someone help me figure it out. The car was originally a 6 banger, the original guy dropped a V8 in it. Then he sold it to the guy I bought it from. That guy didn't do a lot to it, tore it down mainly. When I got it, he said it had a 302 in it, but I seriously am doubting that. The heads are stamped 289, the intake looks stock (2 bbl, blue) and is stamped 289. Last night I pulled the starter (PITA by the way, i still can't get it all the way out, will have to pull the steering rod or the exhaust manifold) and got the casting numbers off the block. I stupidly forgot to bring the whole number in, but it is C9OE for the first 4. Not sure if I need the other digits. From that I found that it is a 1969 Engine out of a Fairlane/Torino models. BUT, that doesn't help me any. What can I look for that will help figure this out. I am 99% sure it is a 289, as I don't figure it would be very likely that someone would get a 302 block and put 289 heads/intake on it, but you never know! Is there a water neck or something that will tell me.

Thanks in advance.
 
S

stangbuilder66

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
25
0
0
Dec 15, 2004
#2
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #2
Gotta love the wife! Got the rest of the number off my paper at home. It is C9OE-6015-C

Above it was stamped 9H4, but I don't think that means anything.

I also have been looking online and it looks like the '69 Fairlane/Torino only ran 302 and up, so maybe it IS a 302. I have bought a set of 302 heads off of a early 90's GT that I am going to put on either way, but would be nice to buy the right parts for the engine
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Dec 15, 2004
#3
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #3
its a 302 block at least. Don't get too worked up about it, they're practically the same engine. The only difference is the 289 rods are slightly longer and the crank stroke is 0.13" shorter. Everything else interchanges.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Dec 15, 2004
#4
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #4
I am pretty sure that it is a 69 302 block. That should be a good, strong block.

C= 60s
9= year
O= fairlane, Torino, LTDII or LN7
E= Engine

The "O" part number you see on a lot of mustangs, even though that particular letter is for the vehicles that I listed. They were interchangeable and were used at the factory as such. Thats what I am told by my grandfather (retired from Ford)
 
S

stangbuilder66

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
25
0
0
Dec 15, 2004
#5
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #5
Cool guys, and thanks for the quick replies. I just found a website that might explain what happened. It seems in 68 and 69 the Cleveland plant ran out of 289 blocks and started using the 302 blocks with 289 guts and parts. That might explain why the 289 heads and intake are on the car. Now i am wondering if I should put all 302 stuff in or just stay with the 289 and replace pistons and such as long as the crank and rods don't need replacing. Oh well, at least I know what I have and what to order.

Thanks again everyone.
 

BobV

20+ Year Stangneter
May 18, 2003
474
0
16
Leavenworth, KS
Dec 15, 2004
#6
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #6
The block, head, and intake #'s aren't really going to tell you anything, since the 289/302 parts are basically interchangable to rebuilders.

Look at the crankshaft for a stamped number - 1M = 2.87 stroke (289) and 2M = 3.00 stroke (302). As mentioned, the rods need to match the crank unless you've got non-standard pistons. A rod # starting with C3 is a 289 rod, C8=302 rod.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 15, 2004
#7
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #7
stangbuilder66 said:
Cool guys, and thanks for the quick replies. I just found a website that might explain what happened. It seems in 68 and 69 the Cleveland plant ran out of 289 blocks and started using the 302 blocks with 289 guts and parts. That might explain why the 289 heads and intake are on the car. Now i am wondering if I should put all 302 stuff in or just stay with the 289 and replace pistons and such as long as the crank and rods don't need replacing. Oh well, at least I know what I have and what to order.

Thanks again everyone.
Click to expand...

Yep, I have a 289 with a 302 block because of that.
 
S

stangbuilder66

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
25
0
0
Dec 15, 2004
#8
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #8
Great68 said:
Yep, I have a 289 with a 302 block because of that.
Click to expand...


So are these pretty common engines? I hadn't come across this before.
 

golf4283

Active Member
May 30, 2003
1,253
1
39
Orland Park, Illinois
Dec 15, 2004
#9
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #9
It id definately possible to put 289 heads on a 302. The 302 that came in my car had 289 heads on it. Very misleading but once the intake came off the block clearly stated 302.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Dec 15, 2004
#10
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #10
the 289 and 302 are the same engine essentially, like mentioned above, so it doesnt matter if u use 289 or 302 parts, all the heads, intake etc. are the same thing. the only difference is the stroke and the rod length. no one except u will ever know the difference.
 

Great68

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
691
0
16
Victoria BC
Dec 15, 2004
#11
  • Dec 15, 2004
  • #11
stangbuilder66 said:
So are these pretty common engines? I hadn't come across this before.
Click to expand...

A friend of mine with a 68 coupe also has a 302 block 289, so it is pretty common and in no way a bad thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
666
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
191
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
T
New Guy from Southeast Missouri
  • tcooke11
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
262
The Welcome Wagon Jan 17, 2026
TomcatPC
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
207
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
137
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?