AirWolf87 said:werent 96 mustangs rated at 225 at the crank?? Oh man imagine what im pulling at the wheels?dont even wanna think about it
Go ahead rub it in!gruntman31 said:My 97 makes good power. More than most bolt on GT's with ported heads/cams.
AirWolf87 said:werent 96 mustangs rated at 225 at the crank?? Oh man imagine what im pulling at the wheels?dont even wanna think about it
gruntman31 said:My 97 makes good power. More than most bolt on GT's with ported heads/cams.
98GTSteve said:260hp is at the motor.... a stock mustang usually dynos ~230 rwhp. If they are making 245-260hp at the wheels then they are actually making 15-20% more at the motor... Factory HP is not rated at the rear wheel.
AirWolf87 said:And heres the sad part.....
I have a cuz with a '01 WS6 Trans Am with only a catback and a different airbox than ran a 330whp on a dyno.
twogts4us said:Finding this hard to believe since the 01 WS6 T/A was 'only' rated at 325 HP (that's NOT at the rear wheels), so likely about 260-275 actually at the wheels (using the formula of 15-20% parasitic drivetrain loss). Hard to imagine a cat back and different airbox gained an additional 55-70 RWHP...Musta been one of those 'fun-house' dynos where everything is distorted.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?