• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is My Main Bearings Within Specs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gnx547
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2013

gnx547

Member
Sep 26, 2006
283
1
19
May 4, 2013
#1
  • May 4, 2013
  • #1
I have a stock 302 block with a stock crank and standard size bearings. I checked the bearing clearance with the green plastic gauge and it is .002 is that within specs?


 

MikeH686

Mine is only two inches though.
10 Year Member
Oct 11, 2011
2,843
1,753
184
Waldorf, MD
May 5, 2013
#2
  • May 5, 2013
  • #2
Do you have a chiltons book? They have a list of specs in their engine rebuild section
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
May 5, 2013
#3
  • May 5, 2013
  • #3
I'd be more concerned about the massive crack that runs through your cylinder wall.
 
Reactions: toolow91
9

95PGTTech

Member
Jan 28, 2008
302
20
19
May 5, 2013
#4
  • May 5, 2013
  • #4
madmike1157 said:
I'd be more concerned about the massive crack that runs through your cylinder wall.
Click to expand...

Good catch.

1985-up
desired 0.0004 to 0.0015 in
allowable 0.0004 to 0.0026 in
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
May 5, 2013
#5
  • May 5, 2013
  • #5
I think .0004 is pretty tight. When i put my motor together, i used a few different resources for specs. Mains were recommended to be .002-.003 (some say .0025-.003). Rod bearings .002 to .003. I am not an engine builder, or have any formal training, but those specs have worked out well so far. Rick may chime in if he is lurking around.

Joe
 

clement

Founding Member
Feb 27, 2001
1,106
52
59
Oak Cliff
May 6, 2013
#6
  • May 6, 2013
  • #6
i go by the rule .001 per inch of journal diameter. if it were a cleveland or windsor main i would want more like .003 for the cleveland and about .0005 more for a windsor. but on a 2.25 302 main, id let .002 eat if its just gonna be a street motor. id like to see .0025, but i dont think you are going to get into ten thousandths increments with plastigauge.
 
9

95PGTTech

Member
Jan 28, 2008
302
20
19
May 6, 2013
#7
  • May 6, 2013
  • #7
RangerJoe said:
I think .0004 is pretty tight. When i put my motor together, i used a few different resources for specs. Mains were recommended to be .002-.003 (some say .0025-.003). Rod bearings .002 to .003. I am not an engine builder, or have any formal training, but those specs have worked out well so far. Rick may chime in if he is lurking around.

Joe
Click to expand...

He asked for the OEM specs, I was not agreeing or disagreeing with them. Engine building is one of the few things I won't do on a car - internal auto trans is the other. I write a check and drop a block off at the machine shop, they handle the rest. Their parts, their machine work, their specs, their gaskets - their problem if something happens.
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
May 6, 2013
#8
  • May 6, 2013
  • #8
madmike1157 said:
I'd be more concerned about the massive crack that runs through your cylinder wall.
Click to expand...

Actually that crack is in the crank and it looks like it's on the verge of a catastrophic failure.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
May 6, 2013
#9
  • May 6, 2013
  • #9
Bullitt95 said:
Actually that crack is in the crank and it looks like it's on the verge of a catastrophic failure.
Click to expand...
Regardless of where the crack is,...OP doesn't seem too concerned that he has an engine w/ such a devastating canyon running through it that will potentially break into two, ballistic chunks of 200+degree farenheit metal, flying apart at 7000 RPM...
 
L

lord_cobra

Member
Sep 2, 2005
96
6
9
May 6, 2013
#10
  • May 6, 2013
  • #10
I could be wrong but I am quite sure the crack is in the cement below the engine that we are looking at through the cylinders.

Sent from my rotary phone!
 

88LX5.Oh

15 Year Member
Dec 30, 2011
1,442
204
94
Arkansas
May 6, 2013
#11
  • May 6, 2013
  • #11
Only crack I see is in his floor/wall lol
 

RangerJoe

I leave the horn on while driving
15 Year Member
Apr 26, 2010
2,560
1,146
184
Georgia
May 7, 2013
#12
  • May 7, 2013
  • #12
I think, hope anyways, that all the posts made in reference to the crack were just a joke. It did require a double take when i first saw it.

Joe
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 7, 2013
#13
  • May 7, 2013
  • #13
clement said:
i go by the rule .001 per inch of journal diameter. if it were a cleveland or windsor main i would want more like .003 for the cleveland and about .0005 more for a windsor. but on a 2.25 302 main, id let .002 eat if its just gonna be a street motor. id like to see .0025, but i dont think you are going to get into ten thousandths increments with plastigauge.
Click to expand...

Agreed....Id let .002" eat all day in stock style motor with no problems at all. You should find a similar clearance on the rod journals....
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
May 8, 2013
#14
  • May 8, 2013
  • #14
lord_cobra said:
I could be wrong but I am quite sure the crack is in the cement below the engine that we are looking at through the cylinders.
Click to expand...

Now that I've taken an even closer look at the photos, you're right. LOL, I think I need to get my eyes checked.
 

gnx547

Member
Sep 26, 2006
283
1
19
May 8, 2013
#15
  • May 8, 2013
  • #15
Also, I just want to make sure, the big (thicker)compression is the top ring followed by the thinner compression ring?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 8, 2013
#16
  • May 8, 2013
  • #16
Depends on what piston you have....stock could be 1.5mm 1.5mm 3mm or 1/16 1/16 5/64 off top of my head.

The rings are marked and usually have a bevel that goes down depending on run Manx. The top ring is generally harder then the softer second ring....the oil ring is 3 pieces.



Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 

gnx547

Member
Sep 26, 2006
283
1
19
May 8, 2013
#17
  • May 8, 2013
  • #17
The pistons are stock. Yes, the top ring is harder than the second ring. Both compression rings have dots on them, and should both dots of rings be facing up when they are installed?
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
May 9, 2013
#18
  • May 9, 2013
  • #18
Depends on the rings...typically dot is up READ the directions that came with the rings.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
120
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
259
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
172
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
207
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?