• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is the way the stock rev limiter works bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nito88stang
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2004

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Oct 1, 2004
#1
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #1
Well i know the stock rev limiter works by cutting fuel. Is this hazardous and can it create a dangerous lean condition? I know cutting spark the way an aftermarket ignition system is best, but is the stock eec way of doin it a ticking bomb?

The reason i ask is because i can get my hands on a msd 6a cheap, but i am wanting to hold out for a 6al for this very reason.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 1, 2004
#2
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #2
i would not want to bounce off the fuel cut too often. it is supposed to be somewhat soft in how it cuts each cylinder, but i would not take a chance myself.

my two cents.
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
42
Oct 1, 2004
#3
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #3
A soft touch rev limiter is much easier on the engine.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Oct 1, 2004
#4
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #4
yea, i dont plan on bouncing off the limiter. Its just that if finally gave my new motor some WOT runs and it absolutely amazed me how fast the revs climb. So i started thinking that at the track i might not be as attentive to the tach and might slip so i want some insurance.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Oct 1, 2004
#5
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #5
giddyup306 said:
A soft touch rev limiter is much easier on the engine.
Click to expand...
Which one is the soft touch limiter?
 

giddyup306

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
3,041
2
59
42
Oct 1, 2004
#6
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #6
nito88stang said:
Which one is the soft touch limiter?
Click to expand...

They are found on many aftermarket ignition boxes such as the MSD 6al (which I run).
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Oct 1, 2004
#7
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #7
Supposedly the stock limiter causes the thin film of oil on the cylinder walls to burn up and causes premature piston/cylinder wear. We all need to get a grip- how often do you hit the limiter? I almost never do.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Oct 1, 2004
#8
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #8
QDRHRSE said:
Supposedly the stock limiter causes the thin film of oil on the cylinder walls to burn up and causes premature piston/cylinder wear. We all need to get a grip- how often do you hit the limiter? I almost never do.
Click to expand...

Hopefully no one hits it... but it happens. On a N/A car, you'll live to do it again. It's when you start tossing nitrous or boost into the mix that it'll really hurt ya. Hitting the stock limiter at WOT @ full boost is not my idea of a great afternoon.
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,854
26
69
Dallas, Texas
tahuck.tripod.com
Oct 1, 2004
#9
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #9
I hit mine twice I think last weekend. (Autoxing no need to shift before turn about to brake hard anyhow) Anyhow slightly :OT: But how much does the stock tach suck for not finding the rev limiter? I spun the tach to 7.5 (well the stock tach only goes to 7k but the needle went past it!) twice! in 2nd gear and couldn't find the limiter there when I thought I should be hitting it. (I looked at the tach right before slamming on the brakes because I was thinking to myself damn I didn't think 2nd was that steep) Thoughts?

I need to get a msd box too myself there kind of pricey thou aren't they? considering this is all I really need it for right now...
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Oct 1, 2004
#10
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #10
Why did Ford choose to cut the fuel instead of the spark anyway? Cutting fuel = lean and dangerous mixture, Cuttin spark = rich and safe mixture. Yeah, it's not like people are bouncing off the rev limiter everytime they drive, but why choose a more unsafe way to keep the engine from over-revving? Sometimes it's kinda fun to just mash the throttle and listen to hear "bum-bum-bum-bum-bum" for a couple seconds.
I like the look on a friends face and when they say "Your gonna blow it". LOL
We aren't ricers though, who drive around boucing off the limiter like they are cool.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
39
Killeen, Texas
Oct 1, 2004
#11
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #11
Labora said:
Anyhow slightly :OT: But how much does the stock tach suck for not finding the rev limiter? I spun the tach to 7.5 (well the stock tach only goes to 7k but the needle went past it!) twice! in 2nd gear and couldn't find the limiter there when I thought I should be hitting it. (I looked at the tach right before slamming on the brakes because I was thinking to myself damn I didn't think 2nd was that steep) Thoughts?
Click to expand...

Apparently real crappy, or else my car doesn't have a limiter. When I was modifying my throttle body and intake setup I accidentally got the throttle stuck wide open. When I cranked the car it instantly wound out to 7k!! But it never hit a limiter.
 
J

jerry beach

Founding Member
May 20, 2002
2,671
0
46
56
Ocala,FL
Oct 1, 2004
#12
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #12
I have been to 7000 rpm on the stock tach many times. These things are just way off. Thats prolly 6 grand. Just going by ear. Its dead on at idle up to 3000, I have a shop tach and have compared the two in that range. I have never hit the rev limiter.
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,854
26
69
Dallas, Texas
tahuck.tripod.com
Oct 1, 2004
#13
  • Oct 1, 2004
  • #13
jerry beach said:
I have been to 7000 rpm on the stock tach many times. These things are just way off. Thats prolly 6 grand. Just going by ear. Its dead on at idle up to 3000, I have a shop tach and have compared the two in that range. I have never hit the rev limiter.
Click to expand...

Thats good to hear that the stock tach is way off I don't have a aftermarket one to compare it too. I've found the limiter in 1st a few times but not 2nd?

Anyhow to get back on topic what are the benfits of a MSD box on car with a few bolt ons?
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Oct 2, 2004
#14
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #14
Labora said:
Thats good to hear that the stock tach is way off I don't have a aftermarket one to compare it too. I've found the limiter in 1st a few times but not 2nd?

Anyhow to get back on topic what are the benfits of a MSD box on car with a few bolt ons?
Click to expand...
as Jerry said, the stocker is off by a percentage - the higher you rev, the more it can be off.

generally speaking, a box will give you a more powerful spark (and multiple sparks), along with some options for racing type stuff (2 stage limiters, boost retard ability, etc).

the stock TFI ignition (IMHO) is very powerful. i believe it is good for 300 horses pretty easily - ive read more, but that seems to be a good number that is agreed upon.
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
44
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
Oct 2, 2004
#15
  • Oct 2, 2004
  • #15
Yeah you want an MSD 6AL. The factory rev limit method of randomly cutting out fuel injectors makes tree-huggers happy by not passing unburned fuel (plugs always fire) but the fuel vapor doesn't get depleted from the ports instantly. Result, the engine continues to spin past the limit before getting choked back by severe detonation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
161
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
P
Electrical MSD box wiring for an 88 GT- few questions.
  • pindude80
  • Jul 20, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
954
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 25, 2024
pindude80
P
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
X
Free VE Table Corrections — Drop Your MSQ and a Datalog, I'll Do the Rest
  • X-cam34
  • Apr 12, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
1K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Yesterday at 11:11 PM
Dontknowchit
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?